Neil D. Burgess, Paul Harrison, Peter Sumbi, James Laizer, Adam ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ANNEXES: TANZANIA’S COASTAL FORESTS 2011 Category Kilwa Landscape Average Score Others Average Score Lindi Landscape Average Score Matumbi Landscape Average Score Zanzibar Landscape Average Score Max Score Kilwa Landscape % Score Others % Score Lindi Landscape % Score Matumbi Landscap e % Score Zanzibar Landscape % Score Ordinal Scores Percentage Scores 23 do indigenous / local peoples input into management decisions 2.41 2.29 1.56 1.94 1.17 3 80% 76% 52% 65% 39% 24 Do local communities input into management decisions 2.41 2.29 1.59 1.78 1.17 3 80% 76% 53% 59% 39% 24a Communication & trust between local/indigenous pple & mngers 1.00 1.00 0.34 0.92 0.67 1 100% 100% 34% 92% 67% 24b Programmes to enhance community welfare implemented 0.76 0.67 0.38 0.90 0.50 1 76% 67% 38% 90% 50% 24c Local/indigenous people actively support the protected area 1.00 0.92 0.06 0.92 0.83 1 100% 92% 6% 92% 83% 25 Is the protected providing benefits to local communities? 1.12 1.54 1.13 0.94 2.17 3 37% 51% 38% 31% 72% 26 Are management activities monitored against performance? 1.12 1.00 0.63 1.14 0.83 3 37% 33% 21% 38% 28% 27 Are visitor facilities adequate? 0.00 0.08 0.22 0.00 1.00 3 0% 3% 7% 0% 33% 28 Do tour operators contribute to protected 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.06 0.67 3 0% 0% 15% 2% 22% 94
ANNEXES: TANZANIA’S COASTAL FORESTS 2011 Category Kilwa Landscape Average Score Others Average Score Lindi Landscape Average Score Matumbi Landscape Average Score Zanzibar Landscape Average Score Max Score Kilwa Landscape % Score Others % Score Lindi Landscape % Score Matumbi Landscap e % Score Zanzibar Landscape % Score area management? Ordinal Scores Percentage Scores 29 If fees are applied, do they help protected area management? 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.50 3 0% 0% 7% 0% 17% 30 What is the relative improvement of status of key PA values? 2.00 1.83 1.38 1.76 2.33 3 67% 61% 46% 59% 78% 30a The assessment of values is based on research / monitoring 1.00 0.13 0.25 0.90 0.17 1 100% 13% 25% 90% 17% 30b Programmes are implemented to address threats to values 1.00 1.00 0.22 0.92 0.83 1 100% 100% 22% 92% 83% 30c Activities to maintain values are routine 1.00 0.67 0.06 0.90 0.67 1 100% 67% 6% 90% 67% 95
Page 1 and 2:
SYNTHESIS OF BASELINE INFORMATION O
Page 3 and 4:
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
INTRODUCTION: TANZANIA’S COASTAL
Page 17 and 18:
BIODIVERSITY BASELINE: TANZANIA’S
Page 19 and 20:
Genus Species Synonyms Red List sta
Page 21 and 22:
East Usambara Kilulu Hills Amboni C
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
SPATIAL PLANNING BASELINE: TANZANIA
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60: SPATIAL PLANNING BASELINE: TANZANIA
Page 65 and 66: MANAGEMENT ISSUES: TANZANIA’S COA
Page 73 and 74: Vikindu Pande Pugu Ruvu Kisiju Much
Page 79 and 80: METT scores (total out of 100) MANA
Page 91 and 92: FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY: TANZANIA
Page 93 and 94: SOCIO-ECONOMIC BASELINE: TANZANIA
Page 95 and 96: SOCIO-ECONOMIC BASELINE: TANZANIA
Page 97 and 98: REFERENCES: TANZANIA’S COASTAL FO
Page 103 and 104: ANNEXES: TANZANIA’S COASTAL FORES
Page 109: ANNEXES: TANZANIA’S COASTAL FORES
Page 113 and 114: KILWA LINDI MATUMBI ZANZIBAR Red Li
Page 125 and 126: KILWA LINDI MATUMBI ZANZIBAR Notes
Page 127 and 128: KILWA LINDI MATUMBI ZANZIBAR Notes
Page 133 and 134: KILWA LINDI MATUMBI ZANZIBAR ENDEMI
Page 161 and 162:
ANNEXES: TANZANIA’S COASTAL FORES
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
show all

Neil D. Burgess, Paul Harrison, Peter Sumbi, James Laizer, Adam ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?