Where is R2P grounded in international law? Anne-Marie Judson A ...
Where is R2P grounded in international law? Anne-Marie Judson A ...
Where is R2P grounded in international law? Anne-Marie Judson A ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2011 <strong>in</strong> the Arab Spr<strong>in</strong>g, Bolivia on many occassions between 1985 and 1995,<br />
political d<strong>is</strong>ruption, social d<strong>is</strong>turbance, general strikes, and assemblies were the reason<br />
for many state of emergencies dur<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>is</strong> time period. In 1995 Columbia l<strong>is</strong>ted social<br />
<strong>in</strong>security, public anxiety and lack of trust by the public for the state of emergency as<br />
these were caus<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternal d<strong>is</strong>turbances and judicial emergencies. Ecuador cited an<br />
upr<strong>is</strong><strong>in</strong>g for the reason of a state of emergency <strong>in</strong> 1986 and strikes <strong>in</strong> 1987 and 1988.<br />
Namibia declared a state of emergency under the rationale of rega<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g constitutional<br />
order <strong>in</strong> 1999. Nicaragua declared a state of emergency <strong>in</strong> 1993 to restore <strong>law</strong> and<br />
order and aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2005 because of a political cr<strong>is</strong><strong>is</strong>. Panama <strong>in</strong> 1987 declared a state<br />
of emergency because of demonstrators and clashes with the defence force. The<br />
derogations were to restore <strong>law</strong> and order. Peru has declared over 50 declarations<br />
from derogations; giv<strong>in</strong>g very few reasons except <strong>in</strong> 2010 where the letter to the<br />
Secretary-General said that public order had been d<strong>is</strong>turbed. In an attempt to restore<br />
public order Russia has derogated on numerous occasions both post derogation and<br />
preplanned derogations to curb public d<strong>is</strong>turbances. Tr<strong>in</strong>idad and Tobago declared a<br />
state of emergency and post derogations <strong>in</strong> order to protect public safety <strong>in</strong> 1990 and<br />
<strong>in</strong> 1995. Venezuela declared a state of emergency under the prem<strong>is</strong>e of a breach of<br />
the peace <strong>in</strong> 1994.<br />
Th<strong>is</strong> research shows that states are will<strong>in</strong>g to declare a public emergency when civilian<br />
upr<strong>is</strong><strong>in</strong>gs become a threat to public order and control.<br />
HOW MANY STATES ARE IN BREACH OF THE ICCPR DUE TO NOT<br />
IDENTIFYING THE REASONS FOR THE STATE OF EMERGENCY?<br />
There are a number of cases where states have been seen as not apply<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
requ<strong>is</strong>ites for breaches under the requirements to submit the reasons to the Secretary-<br />
General. These <strong>in</strong>clude Algeria <strong>in</strong> a declaration <strong>in</strong> 1991, which cont<strong>in</strong>ued for another<br />
11 years until 2011; Argent<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> 2001 where any breach or all breaches are assumed<br />
but not quantified; Chile <strong>in</strong> 1976 failed to supply the articles from which it was<br />
derogat<strong>in</strong>g from; Columbia <strong>in</strong> 1976 also failed to supply articles; Ecuador failed to say<br />
why <strong>in</strong> 1982; Egypt <strong>is</strong> a party to the ICCPR and yet has not submitted a declaration<br />
to the Secretary-General to say that it has been <strong>in</strong> a state of emergency s<strong>in</strong>ce 1967,<br />
except for a break <strong>in</strong> 1980 and after the assass<strong>in</strong>ation of Anwar Sadat the state of<br />
emergency was renewed. It has been cont<strong>in</strong>uously extended every three years s<strong>in</strong>ce.<br />
<br />
112