Where is R2P grounded in international law? Anne-Marie Judson A ...
Where is R2P grounded in international law? Anne-Marie Judson A ...
Where is R2P grounded in international law? Anne-Marie Judson A ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
should apply rules of <strong>in</strong>ternational humanitarian <strong>law</strong> which <strong>is</strong> beyond doubt part of<br />
customary <strong>law</strong>, so that problems of adherence of some but not all states to specific<br />
conventions does not ar<strong>is</strong>e. Th<strong>is</strong> would appear to be particularly important <strong>in</strong> the<br />
context of an <strong>in</strong>ternational tribunal prosecut<strong>in</strong>g persons responsible for serious<br />
violations of <strong>in</strong>ternational humanitarian <strong>law</strong>”.<br />
He <strong>in</strong>cludes the Nuremberg Tribunal Charter, the Hague Convention (1907) and the<br />
Geneva Conventions (1949), (1977) as well as the Genocide Convention (1947) as part<br />
of humanitarian <strong>law</strong>. He does not consider crimes aga<strong>in</strong>st humanity as be<strong>in</strong>g d<strong>is</strong>t<strong>in</strong>ct<br />
from these and therefore does not choose to set up the tribunal under th<strong>is</strong> jur<strong>is</strong>diction<br />
or description. Instead he adds that crimes aga<strong>in</strong>st humanity were first recognized <strong>in</strong><br />
the Charter and Judgment of the Nuremberg tribunal as well as <strong>law</strong> No 10 of the<br />
Control Council for Germany. He does not outl<strong>in</strong>e that crimes aga<strong>in</strong>st humanity <strong>in</strong><br />
these cases were unsuccessful <strong>in</strong> the prosecution of <strong>in</strong>dividuals. Instead he says that<br />
crimes aga<strong>in</strong>st humanity are aimed at any civilian population and are prohibited<br />
regardless of whether they are committed <strong>in</strong> an “armed conflict <strong>in</strong>ternational or<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternal <strong>in</strong> character”. Article 5 clarifies th<strong>is</strong> when it restricts the prosecution of crimes<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st humanity to “crimes when committed <strong>in</strong> armed conflict”, and no mention <strong>is</strong><br />
given to times of peace. 308<br />
Security Council Resolutions 764 (1992), 771 (1992) and 780 (1992) showed that the<br />
matters constituted “widespread violations of <strong>in</strong>ternational humanitarian <strong>law</strong><br />
occurr<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> the territory of the former Yugoslavia, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g (…) mass kill<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
and the cont<strong>in</strong>uation of the practice of ethnic cleans<strong>in</strong>g”. 309 The Secretary-General<br />
said that the Security Council had “determ<strong>in</strong>ed that the situation posed by cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g<br />
reports of widespread violations of <strong>in</strong>ternational humanitarian <strong>law</strong> (…) constitutes a<br />
threat to <strong>in</strong>ternational peace and security”. Once aga<strong>in</strong> there was no mention of<br />
crimes aga<strong>in</strong>st humanity as be<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>ternational <strong>law</strong> that could constitute<br />
prosecutorial procedures on the people or the state, on its own.<br />
In a similar ve<strong>in</strong> the International Crim<strong>in</strong>al Tribunal for Rwanda was set up under<br />
the Genocide Convention (1947). It was also establ<strong>is</strong>hed under Resolution 935 (1994).<br />
308 United Nations. (1993). Report of the Secretary-General pursuant to paragraph 2 of the <br />
Security Council Resolution 808. United Nations . (SC/25704) <br />
309 See articles 10 and 25 <br />
<br />
93