Where is R2P grounded in international law? Anne-Marie Judson A ...
Where is R2P grounded in international law? Anne-Marie Judson A ...
Where is R2P grounded in international law? Anne-Marie Judson A ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Injurious or to have Ind<strong>is</strong>crim<strong>in</strong>ate Effects. Geneva, 21 December 2001.<br />
(75 Parties)<br />
5. Protocol on Explosive Remnants of War to the Convention on Prohibitions or<br />
Restrictions on the Use of Certa<strong>in</strong> Conventional Weapons, which may be<br />
deemed to be Excessively Injurious or to have Ind<strong>is</strong>crim<strong>in</strong>ate Effects<br />
(Protocol V) Geneva, 28 th November 2003. (72 Parties)<br />
6. Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpil<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction, Geneva, 3 rd<br />
September 1992. (165 Signatories, 188 Parties) Israel and Myanmar were<br />
two States identified as not be<strong>in</strong>g a party to th<strong>is</strong> Convention.<br />
7. Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, New York, 10 th September 1996<br />
(181 Signatories, 153 Parties)<br />
8. Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpil<strong>in</strong>g, Production and<br />
Transfer of Anti-Personnel M<strong>in</strong>es and on their Destruction, Oslo, 18 th<br />
September 1997. (133 Signatories, 156 Parties)<br />
9. Convention on Cluster Munitions, Dubl<strong>in</strong>, 30 th May 2008. (108 Signatories,<br />
57 Parties)<br />
<br />
141