Where is R2P grounded in international law? Anne-Marie Judson A ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

GEORGIA UNSC Resolution 1866 (2009) http://www.un.org/Docs/sc/unsc_resolutions09.htm GUINEA-BISSAU UNSC Resolution 1949 (2010) http://www.un.org/Docs/sc/unsc_resolutions10.htm UNSC Resolution 1876 (2009) http://www.un.org/Docs/sc/unsc_resolutions09.htm HAITI UNSC Resolution 1944 (2010) http://www.un.org/Docs/sc/unsc_resolutions10.htm UNSC Resolution 1927 (2010) http://www.un.org/Docs/sc/unsc_resolutions10.htm UNSC Resolution 1892 (2009) http://www.un.org/Docs/sc/unsc_resolutions09.htm 170
IRAQ 2011 UNSC Resolution 2001 (2011) http://www.un.org/Docs/sc/unsc_resolutions11.htm 2010 UNSC Resolution 1958 (2010) http://www.un.org/Docs/sc/unsc_resolutions10.htm UNSC Resolution 1957 (2010) http://www.un.org/Docs/sc/unsc_resolutions10.htm UNSC Resolution 1956 (2010) http://www.un.org/Docs/sc/unsc_resolutions10.htm UNSC Resolution 1936 (2010) http://www.un.org/Docs/sc/unsc_resolutions10.htm 2009 UNSC Resolution 1905 (2009) http://www.un.org/Docs/sc/unsc_resolutions09.htm UNSC Resolution 1883 (2009) http://www.un.org/Docs/sc/unsc_resolutions09.htm 171
Page 1 and 2:
Where is R2P grounded in internatio
Page 3 and 4:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Firstly I would li
Page 5 and 6:
3.0.6 What factual relationships mu
Page 7 and 8:
INTRODUCTION - Treaties are not emp
Page 9 and 10:
frameworks to intervene in a state,
Page 11 and 12:
HOW DOES INTERNATIONAL LAW LINK IN
Page 13 and 14:
intervention 4 and agrees more alon
Page 15:
International Commission on State S
Page 18 and 19:
considered jus cogens. 21 They did
Page 20 and 21:
World Summit outcome document on R2
Page 22 and 23:
of states is, in fact, the entire d
Page 24 and 25:
Treaties (1969) now considered as c
Page 26 and 27:
JURISPRUDENCE AND THE CODIFICATION
Page 28 and 29:
Amador realised in the 1950s that i
Page 30 and 31:
international organisations he said
Page 32 and 33:
within the secondary category, it d
Page 35 and 36:
CHAPTER 2 - RIGHTS, DUTIES, AND RES
Page 37 and 38:
any obligation of whatever origin g
Page 39 and 40:
diplomatic and consular staff. 97 T
Page 41 and 42:
The state itself is not necessarily
Page 43 and 44:
of international law, the conduct o
Page 45 and 46:
not the receiving state. Situations
Page 47 and 48:
that have been integrated to preven
Page 49 and 50:
planning and supervision of militar
Page 51 and 52:
obligation of that state”. 135 Th
Page 53 and 54:
This shows that a breach is not lim
Page 55:
The omission or failure to act ties
Page 58 and 59:
nature by conjointly agreeing to bo
Page 60 and 61:
or violation of international law t
Page 62 and 63:
etween the reserving state and acce
Page 64 and 65:
WHAT IS INTERNATIONAL CUSTOMARY LAW
Page 66 and 67:
against Women (2005). In addition s
Page 68 and 69:
THE CRIME OF ETHNIC CLEANSING The R
Page 70 and 71:
extends to ensuring that political
Page 72 and 73:
This convention seeks to ensure tha
Page 74 and 75:
towards a group as such, required b
Page 76 and 77:
are protected under this convention
Page 78 and 79:
convention or not. This responsibil
Page 80 and 81:
to body or health, as well as compe
Page 82 and 83:
No propaganda or pressure is allowe
Page 84 and 85:
intention as outlined is to dispers
Page 86 and 87:
military objectives at all times. R
Page 88 and 89:
military warfare then the civilian
Page 90 and 91:
the Geneva conventions, constitutes
Page 92 and 93:
crimes against humanity, the acts r
Page 94 and 95:
This situation also constituted “
Page 97 and 98:
CHAPTER 4 - APPLICATION AND STATE D
Page 99 and 100:
that the present Covenant does not
Page 101 and 102:
provisions are also included. 319 D
Page 103 and 104:
other media. 331 During a state of
Page 105 and 106:
institutions. 340 It says that inte
Page 107 and 108:
of an apprehension of potential dan
Page 109 and 110:
place between two parties, and the
Page 111 and 112:
eformation under Article 13 covers
Page 113 and 114:
France declared a state of emergenc
Page 115 and 116:
means that it would be illegal to i
Page 117 and 118:
DISCUSSION - WHERE DO WE GO FROM HE
Page 119 and 120: egional organisations as appropriat
Page 121 and 122: peace. It would appear that there w
Page 123 and 124: CONCLUSION At first glance R2P appe
Page 125 and 126: instructions but nevertheless actin
Page 127 and 128: were found to be a part of war crim
Page 129 and 130: BIBLIOGRAPHY (PRIMARY RESOURCES) In
Page 131 and 132: BIBLIOGRAPHY (PRIMARY RESOURCES) Un
Page 133 and 134: BIBLIOGRAPHY (SECONDARY RESOURCES)
Page 135 and 136: TABLE OF LEGAL CASES All cases can
Page 137 and 138: MULTILATERAL TREATIES, AND OTHER DO
Page 139 and 140: 4. Resolution 1894 - S/RES/1894 (20
Page 141 and 142: Injurious or to have Indiscriminate
Page 143 and 144: Hague III - Adaptation to Maritime
Page 145 and 146: UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA United Nati
Page 147 and 148: INTERNATIONAL COURTS INTERNATIONAL
Page 149 and 150: INTERNATIONAL LAW COMMISSION YEAR B
Page 151 and 152: UNITED NATIONS DIGITAL RESOURCES UN
Page 153 and 154: CONVENTION ON THE NON-APPLICABILITY
Page 155 and 156: SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS BY YEA
Page 157 and 158: SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS - ARME
Page 159 and 160: 2001 http://www.un.org/Docs/scres/2
Page 161 and 162: MAINTENANCE OF INTERNATIONAL PEACE
Page 163 and 164: BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA - Please not
Page 165 and 166: UNSC Resolution 1256 (1999) http://
Page 167 and 168: BURUNDI UNSC Resolution 1959 (2010)
Page 169: DEMOCRATIC PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF KORE
Page 173 and 174: LIBERIA 2011 UNSC RESOLUTION 2008 (
Page 175 and 176: MIDDLE EAST 2011 UNSC Resolution 20
Page 177 and 178: RWANDA - Please note access is limi
Page 181 and 182: SIERRA LEONE 2011 UNSC RESOLUTION 2
Page 185 and 186: YUGOSLAVIA (former Yugoslavia) Plea
Page 191 and 192: DEROGATIONS OF STATES UNDER ICCPR 1
Page 197: DEROGATIONS OF STATES UNDER ICCPR 1
show all

Where is R2P grounded in international law? Anne-Marie Judson A ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?