01.05.2014 Views

Research 350 - NZ Transport Agency

Research 350 - NZ Transport Agency

Research 350 - NZ Transport Agency

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

APPENDIX A<br />

Appendix A: Additional Economic Benefits<br />

from the Transmission Gully<br />

Project<br />

(Brown, Copeland & Company Limited, for Greater Wellington City<br />

Council, Wellington, New Zealand, March, 2004)<br />

AA.1<br />

Synopsis<br />

This paper reviews the appraisal mechanism for the Transmission Gully road project in<br />

Wellington. The key focus is on whether any there are additional economic benefits (in<br />

addition to the ‘traditional benefits of travel time savings, vehicle operating costs and<br />

accident costs) arising from the completion of the project.<br />

A number of sources of additional national or regional economic benefit are identified. Major<br />

identified benefits include:<br />

• Generated traffic – This will produce additional economic benefits from a national and<br />

regional perspective. These are seen as significant in this case and should be included<br />

as a part of the assessed benefits if they have not already been so.<br />

• Local network traffic benefits – Access between Wellington CBD and the suburbs will<br />

be improved by the project. These impacts should be addressed by the appraisal (if<br />

they are not already).<br />

• Hutt Valley traffic benefits – Effects for traffic to and from the Hutt Valley should be<br />

included in the analysis as part of a full network analysis of benefits.<br />

• Impacts of Abnormal Delays – The existence of an alternative route out of Wellington<br />

will reduce the incidence of abnormal delays due to accidents or floods. These will not<br />

be built into average travel times used by models, as these work on the basis of<br />

observed times during typical AM inter-peak and PM periods. Allowance should be<br />

made for this in any appraisal.<br />

• Responses to unreliability of travel time – Abnormal delays, if frequent enough, can<br />

cause motorists to change their behaviour patterns (e.g. travelling earlier/later than<br />

necessary, working longer hours, travelling off-peak and over-investing in vehicles).<br />

This economic cost will probably be ignored by a conventional SCBA and should be<br />

allowed for in an assessment.<br />

• Intangibles – These include environmental and social impacts.<br />

Less significant national and regional benefits include:<br />

• Ability to handle oversized or very heavy vehicles – This was seen as a longer term<br />

benefit which might be quantified following additional studies.<br />

• Wider catchment for job seekers and employers – An increase in workforce quality<br />

could ensue from the route; however, this should only be treated qualitatively.<br />

• Potential travel benefits – These include the utility residents and businesses get from<br />

knowing a journey is possible, without necessarily making the journey. It is suggested<br />

these could be estimated on a broad ‘willingness to pay’ basis.<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!