Research 350 - NZ Transport Agency
Research 350 - NZ Transport Agency
Research 350 - NZ Transport Agency
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
APPENDIX I<br />
Appendix I: Predicting the Impacts of Road<br />
Investment on Gross State<br />
Product and Employment<br />
(George Docwra and Guy West, Contributed paper presented at<br />
23rd Australasian <strong>Transport</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Forum, Perth, Australia,<br />
Sept-Oct 1999)<br />
AI.1<br />
Synopsis<br />
As its name suggests, the focus of this paper is on examining the utility of various<br />
approaches to measuring the impacts of road projects on regional output and employment.<br />
The authors view SCBA as useful, but also see it as providing limited guidance due to the fact<br />
that policymakers often wish to have a wider test of ‘public benefit’ than the economic<br />
efficiency impacts captured by SCBA (i.e. one including measures of regional employment,<br />
output and income). As such, they see Input-Output (I-O) and/or General Equilibrium (CGE)<br />
modelling as complementing the results of SCBA. They indicate that applying a model which<br />
provides knowledge of employment and Gross State Product (GSP) outcomes may be useful<br />
for a variety of reasons, including:<br />
• It may assist in obtaining funding allocations.<br />
• There may be conflict between the results of SCBA and employment implications of a<br />
given project. For example, projects with low benefit-cost ratios could generate high<br />
levels of employment. Using SCBA in conjunction with other models can help decisionmakers<br />
identify when choices need to be made between conflicting policy goals.<br />
• Various projects may have different impacts on regional development. These may not<br />
match differences in benefit-cost ratios.<br />
The authors compare what they term the Applied General Equilibrium (ACGE) and inputoutput<br />
econometric (IOEC) models. The second of these appears to combine standard I-O<br />
modelling with some additional econometric data. In general, the IOEC model is preferred to<br />
the ACGE approach for regional analysis. This relates to the authors’ specification of the<br />
properties which an ‘ideal regional model’ for road investment should possess. These<br />
include:<br />
• Use of a bottom-up modelling approach.<br />
• Comprehensive supply-side specification supplemented by data on capacity limits and<br />
endogenised prices.<br />
• Integration with the national economy, allowing for feed back interactions to measure<br />
both region-specific and national policy impacts at the regional level. This would<br />
include an inter-regional model to allow for flow-on effects to surrounding regions.<br />
• A fully comprehensive labour market sub-model, allowing for differential skills, labour<br />
mobility and turnover.<br />
The authors also note that only IOEC modelling can adequately cater for the short run<br />
dynamics of road investment programs. In addition, the lack of dynamics in ACGE models<br />
135