01.05.2014 Views

Research 350 - NZ Transport Agency

Research 350 - NZ Transport Agency

Research 350 - NZ Transport Agency

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

APPENDIX I<br />

Appendix I: Predicting the Impacts of Road<br />

Investment on Gross State<br />

Product and Employment<br />

(George Docwra and Guy West, Contributed paper presented at<br />

23rd Australasian <strong>Transport</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Forum, Perth, Australia,<br />

Sept-Oct 1999)<br />

AI.1<br />

Synopsis<br />

As its name suggests, the focus of this paper is on examining the utility of various<br />

approaches to measuring the impacts of road projects on regional output and employment.<br />

The authors view SCBA as useful, but also see it as providing limited guidance due to the fact<br />

that policymakers often wish to have a wider test of ‘public benefit’ than the economic<br />

efficiency impacts captured by SCBA (i.e. one including measures of regional employment,<br />

output and income). As such, they see Input-Output (I-O) and/or General Equilibrium (CGE)<br />

modelling as complementing the results of SCBA. They indicate that applying a model which<br />

provides knowledge of employment and Gross State Product (GSP) outcomes may be useful<br />

for a variety of reasons, including:<br />

• It may assist in obtaining funding allocations.<br />

• There may be conflict between the results of SCBA and employment implications of a<br />

given project. For example, projects with low benefit-cost ratios could generate high<br />

levels of employment. Using SCBA in conjunction with other models can help decisionmakers<br />

identify when choices need to be made between conflicting policy goals.<br />

• Various projects may have different impacts on regional development. These may not<br />

match differences in benefit-cost ratios.<br />

The authors compare what they term the Applied General Equilibrium (ACGE) and inputoutput<br />

econometric (IOEC) models. The second of these appears to combine standard I-O<br />

modelling with some additional econometric data. In general, the IOEC model is preferred to<br />

the ACGE approach for regional analysis. This relates to the authors’ specification of the<br />

properties which an ‘ideal regional model’ for road investment should possess. These<br />

include:<br />

• Use of a bottom-up modelling approach.<br />

• Comprehensive supply-side specification supplemented by data on capacity limits and<br />

endogenised prices.<br />

• Integration with the national economy, allowing for feed back interactions to measure<br />

both region-specific and national policy impacts at the regional level. This would<br />

include an inter-regional model to allow for flow-on effects to surrounding regions.<br />

• A fully comprehensive labour market sub-model, allowing for differential skills, labour<br />

mobility and turnover.<br />

The authors also note that only IOEC modelling can adequately cater for the short run<br />

dynamics of road investment programs. In addition, the lack of dynamics in ACGE models<br />

135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!