02.05.2014 Views

ERATO Proceedings Istanbul 2006.pdf - Odeon

ERATO Proceedings Istanbul 2006.pdf - Odeon

ERATO Proceedings Istanbul 2006.pdf - Odeon

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.2 Reverberation Time T 30 vs. Frequency<br />

2,50<br />

Aspendos Theatre: T 30 vs. Frequency<br />

2,00<br />

T30(s)<br />

1,50<br />

1,00<br />

0,50<br />

0,00<br />

63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000<br />

Frequency (Hz)<br />

Aspendos Roman Empty<br />

Aspendos Roman Full<br />

Aspendos Present Empty<br />

Aspendos Present Full<br />

Aspendos Present Stage Empty Aspendos Present Stage Full<br />

Figure 3. Calculated reverberation time T30 as a function of frequency in different configurations of Aspendos Theatre.<br />

The parameter values are averaged over all source-receiver positions.<br />

We see in Fig. 3 that for the Aspendos theatre in present state, the modern stage provides a decrease<br />

of reverberation time at mid-frequencies, and in the case of the Roman reconstruction (with added<br />

velum and stage canopy) there is only minor difference in reverberation.<br />

From Table 1 it is seen that in Jerash theatre the reconstruction of mainly the frons scaenea results in<br />

an increase of the reverberation time of around 0,3 s. It is also seen that the Syracuse theatre in the<br />

Roman era had around 0,6 s longer reverberation than in the present stage. This is mainly due to the<br />

frons scaenae but also the colonnade provided some reverberation.<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!