02.05.2014 Views

ERATO Proceedings Istanbul 2006.pdf - Odeon

ERATO Proceedings Istanbul 2006.pdf - Odeon

ERATO Proceedings Istanbul 2006.pdf - Odeon

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

trend of the G parameter, which, though similar in the three cases, shows some biases at a fixed<br />

distance according primarily to the stage characteristics.<br />

On the contrary the tail is very important for the reverberation time and therefore the visible<br />

differences are given by the dimension of the cavea and the presence or absence of architectural<br />

features like the upper colonnade.<br />

Finally a compensation for the air absorption in the IR was experienced but later dropped. Its<br />

effectiveness in the present case is surely not as important as in closed spaces; in fact the absorption<br />

of the missing ceiling is far larger then any possible correction for the air absorption.<br />

7 CONCLUDING REMARKS<br />

As it is evident from the acoustical measurement results, the sound field in the ancient theatres has a<br />

unique character. The contributions of the specific architectural parts can be traced back in the<br />

impulse response. In particular the orchestra floor and the stage building provide very strong early<br />

reflections and the cavea contributes with the scattered sound that makes up the reverberant tail.<br />

Even if the theatres have no ceiling, which is replaced by an ideal surface of unit absorption, the<br />

reverberation time in Roman theatres is similar to closed theatres: but in this case the clarity it is<br />

higher and the sound level is very low.<br />

The above set of scale model measurements can be compared with the measured data taken in<br />

several real scale well preserved ancient theatres [3], [4].<br />

2.0<br />

1.8<br />

Columns and stage<br />

building<br />

Different stage buildings<br />

No columns<br />

No stage building<br />

No columns<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

T30 [s] (mid freq)<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

Aspendos<br />

Roman<br />

Hellenistic<br />

Jerash<br />

Roman w/o<br />

columns<br />

Greek<br />

Taormina<br />

Delphi<br />

Greek w/o stage<br />

Figure 8. Comparison between RTs measured in real theatres and different configurations of the scale model<br />

By doing so, the effect of the architectural elements can be further tested through examination of the<br />

measured RT at middle frequencies. The results of such procedure are shown in Figure 8.<br />

The Aspendos theatre (Turkey) it is a very well preserved Roman theatre with the colonnade and the<br />

complete stage wall. Despite the differences in tiers slope and overall dimensions, the measured RT<br />

almost matches with RO and HE scale models.<br />

Moreover the Jerash theatre (Jordan) is a Roman theatre without the colonnade and with a stage wall<br />

where just one storey is preserved, and Taormina theatre (Italy) is a Roman theatre without<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!