02.05.2014 Views

Search - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

Search - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

Search - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 1. Configuration of the Pb-Bi-cooled HYPER core (183 fuel assemblies)<br />

2.2 B 4<br />

C-coated cladding<br />

In order for a material to be an effective burnable absorber, its neutron capture cross-section<br />

should be much larger than those of fuel elements. Also a neutron capture of a burnable absorber<br />

should not generate nuclides with large capture cross-sections and at the same time daughter nuclides<br />

should be naive in terms of radiotoxicity. Taking into account the above constrains on burnable<br />

absorbers, 10 B seems to be the best candidate for the burnable absorbing material of the HYPER core.<br />

10 B absorbs a neutron through ( , γ )<br />

reaction, is an exothermic process:<br />

n or ( , α)<br />

n reaction. The ( n , α)<br />

reaction, i.e. helium production<br />

B +<br />

10 1 7 4<br />

5<br />

+ n0<br />

→ Li3<br />

+ He2<br />

Q<br />

where Q is about 2.79 Mev for thermal neutrons and is a little larger in fast neutron systems. Table II<br />

compares one-group effective cross-sections of boron and plutonium isotopes in the HYPER fuel<br />

assembly. As shown in Table 2, the capture cross-section of 10 B is a little larger than the fission crosssection<br />

of 239 Pu, the major fissile isotopes of the TRU fuel. Neutron absorptions of 11 B and Li-7 are<br />

negligibly small. Table 2 shows that the depletion rate of 10 B is a little faster than that of 239 Pu even in<br />

very hard neutron spectrum.<br />

,<br />

784

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!