02.05.2014 Views

Search - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

Search - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

Search - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

As suggested by Uhrig [6], a method to obtain the k eff<br />

, values was from the plot of the crosspower<br />

spectral density versus the frequency. The simpler way is to find out the value of the eigenvalue<br />

α<br />

0<br />

, from the break frequency value. The break frequency value for a single pole, can be obtained<br />

from the plot of the phase ( Φ<br />

12<br />

( w)<br />

) versus frequency, looking for the frequency which has a phase<br />

equal to ( − π ). This method can be applied to the simulations performed with LAHET/MCNP-DSP<br />

4<br />

by Y. Rugama et al. [7] see Figure 2.<br />

The simulations performed with LAHET + MCNP-DSP confirm that for the case of one<br />

accelerator proton pulse per data block, one obtain the correct value of the eigenvalue from the<br />

CPSD 12<br />

(w) module and phase vs. frequency plots and then from the break frequency f<br />

b<br />

in Hz. The<br />

eigenvalue is given by:<br />

α0 = 2πf b<br />

(17)<br />

The multiplication constant of the system can be obtained from the expression:<br />

α 0<br />

Keff −1<br />

keff<br />

=<br />

Λ<br />

(18)<br />

Where Λ is obtained from some previous calculation or determination. The mean generation<br />

time for the 233 U/ 232 Th FEA cooled by liquid metal, from a previous calculation, was equal<br />

to: Λ = 8.25846 × 10 -7 s.<br />

We have checked that this method gives the correct value of the multiplication constant k eff<br />

with<br />

an acceptable error. For instance from the phase diagram obtained with LAHET + MCNP-DSP we get<br />

a value of the Keff = 0. 985983 while with MCNP-4A, the K eff<br />

from the sub-critical systems was<br />

equal to 0 .96627 ± 0. 00067 .<br />

The α<br />

0<br />

eigenvalue of the system for the fundamental mode, so it will be independent of the<br />

numbers of proton pulses per block. In this study the data will be given using one pulse per data block<br />

because as we can observe in Figure 3. The pole location using 1 pulse per data block or 5 pulses is at<br />

the same point, but only for 1 pulse, the frequency at the phase equal to − π will give us the exactly<br />

4<br />

value for the break frequency.<br />

837

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!