04.05.2014 Views

Beyond Glass Ceilings and Brick Walls - International Labour ...

Beyond Glass Ceilings and Brick Walls - International Labour ...

Beyond Glass Ceilings and Brick Walls - International Labour ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER TWO<br />

Demolishing <strong>Brick</strong> <strong>Walls</strong><br />

Gender Dimensions of Organizational<br />

Structures, Cultures <strong>and</strong> Micropolitics<br />

Maithree Wickramasinghe<br />

Gendered Work Structures <strong>and</strong> Practices<br />

We have already argued that because work organizations are essentially male<br />

dominated <strong>and</strong> because powers within these organizations are vested in men,<br />

there is structural <strong>and</strong> cultural gender inequity/inequality in the work place. In<br />

other words, work structures tend to be patriarchal in nature, while work practices<br />

are <strong>and</strong>rocentric-contributing primarily to the propagation of values, needs <strong>and</strong><br />

interests valorized by men as male, to the exclusion <strong>and</strong> detriment of women.<br />

This can be attributed to the historical roots of patriarchy, or women’s<br />

subordination or gender inequity in societies. There are, of course, many monocausal<br />

theories explaining the phenomena, such as those founded on biology<br />

or reproductive roles; or men’s innate violence against women; or the gender<br />

division of labour. However, these explanations tend to essentialize the<br />

complexities of the differential <strong>and</strong> inequitable situation of men <strong>and</strong> women in<br />

socio-political, cultural, familial <strong>and</strong> personal relations. And it is not the objective<br />

of this book to theorize on the reasons for gender inequity/ inequality.<br />

Suffice to say, that this chapter, through the use of qualitative examples,<br />

demonstrates the precise ways in which these patriarchal organizational<br />

structures <strong>and</strong> practices of work institutions have differential implications<br />

for men <strong>and</strong> women. In doing so, it is possible to see the resultant<br />

organizational culture as constituting of a clearly discernible superstructure<br />

<strong>and</strong> a less overt substructure. The superstructure consists of highly visible<br />

organizational arrangements such as work/management tiers, promotional<br />

ladders, labour/financial exchanges, corporate practices, institutional<br />

mechanisms etc.<br />

On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the substructure (Rao et al 1999) may be less tangible.<br />

It consists of accepted gender relations, conventions of behaviour, family/<br />

work splits, language practices <strong>and</strong> moral codes etc. The workings of the<br />

superstructure <strong>and</strong> substructure give rise to the gender micropolitics within<br />

organizations. Organizational micropolitics are tantamount to the conflicts,<br />

resentments, competing interests <strong>and</strong> power imbalances, networks <strong>and</strong><br />

coalitions, political <strong>and</strong> personal strategies to effect or resist change at workplaces<br />

(Morley 1999).<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!