10.05.2014 Views

February 22, 2013 - Oregon State Bar

February 22, 2013 - Oregon State Bar

February 22, 2013 - Oregon State Bar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

an additional fee of $15,000 would need to be paid for his work to continue. Mr. Jordan was<br />

not in fact suspended at this time, the additional $15,000 was never paid, and Mr. Jordan went<br />

on to file a brief before the end of 2007.<br />

Mr. Jordan prepared and filed an Appellant’s Opening Brief. The brief was timely filed in<br />

late 2007 after several extensions of time were granted by the Court of Appeals. Mr. Jordan<br />

requested and received multiple extensions of time due to the lengthy preparation of the trial<br />

transcript and to his own lengthy brief preparation period. The brief Mr. Jordan filed ran some<br />

50 pages and included six assignments of error. It is of some interest that the Department of<br />

Justice in its pleadings noted the brief rightfully should have been even longer, as Mr. Jordan<br />

used a 12-point typeface instead of the required 13-point typeface. The investigator reviewed<br />

the Appellant’s Opening Brief in the Court of Appeals file. The brief appears to have been<br />

thoroughly researched and competently prepared.<br />

Mr. Jordan was suspended in <strong>Oregon</strong> on January 1, 2008. He has not to this day been<br />

reinstated. Mr. Jordan does not appear to have performed any work on Mr. Flores-Salazar’s<br />

behalf after the date of his suspension.<br />

Mr. Flores-Salazar obtained the assistance of a publicly-appointed attorney from the<br />

Public Defense Services Commission’s Appellate Division. The PDSC court-appointed attorney<br />

requested and received permission to file a supplemental brief. The Supplemental Brief<br />

contained additional briefing materials on only one of the six assignments of error. The original<br />

brief was not amended, withdrawn or disavowed in any way by the court-appointed appellate<br />

attorney.<br />

The conviction was ultimately affirmed without opinion.<br />

Mr. Flores-Salazar has not filed a civil complaint in any court against Mr. Jordan, and no<br />

judgment is forthcoming. There has been no criminal prosecution of Mr. Jordan in connection<br />

with this matter.<br />

A PLF claim is pending against Mr. Jordan in connection with this matter.<br />

Mr. Jordan’s file and time records, if any exist, are not available for review.<br />

Investigator’s Actions<br />

The investigator contacted Mr. Linn Davis in the <strong>Oregon</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> Disciplinary<br />

Counsel’s Office for information about Mr. Jordan and this claim. Mr. Davis advised the<br />

investigator that there were no time records available, Mr. Jordan’s file would not likely be<br />

available, and that Mr. Jordan would likely not be available for interview. Mr. Davis sent the<br />

investigator a timeline of Mr. Jordan’s various suspensions.<br />

The investigator obtained an OJIN print of the Clackamas County Circuit Court case in<br />

which Mr. Flores-Salazar was convicted, which was the subject of the appeal Mr. Jordan was<br />

hired to handle.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!