February 22, 2013 - Oregon State Bar
February 22, 2013 - Oregon State Bar
February 22, 2013 - Oregon State Bar
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
an additional fee of $15,000 would need to be paid for his work to continue. Mr. Jordan was<br />
not in fact suspended at this time, the additional $15,000 was never paid, and Mr. Jordan went<br />
on to file a brief before the end of 2007.<br />
Mr. Jordan prepared and filed an Appellant’s Opening Brief. The brief was timely filed in<br />
late 2007 after several extensions of time were granted by the Court of Appeals. Mr. Jordan<br />
requested and received multiple extensions of time due to the lengthy preparation of the trial<br />
transcript and to his own lengthy brief preparation period. The brief Mr. Jordan filed ran some<br />
50 pages and included six assignments of error. It is of some interest that the Department of<br />
Justice in its pleadings noted the brief rightfully should have been even longer, as Mr. Jordan<br />
used a 12-point typeface instead of the required 13-point typeface. The investigator reviewed<br />
the Appellant’s Opening Brief in the Court of Appeals file. The brief appears to have been<br />
thoroughly researched and competently prepared.<br />
Mr. Jordan was suspended in <strong>Oregon</strong> on January 1, 2008. He has not to this day been<br />
reinstated. Mr. Jordan does not appear to have performed any work on Mr. Flores-Salazar’s<br />
behalf after the date of his suspension.<br />
Mr. Flores-Salazar obtained the assistance of a publicly-appointed attorney from the<br />
Public Defense Services Commission’s Appellate Division. The PDSC court-appointed attorney<br />
requested and received permission to file a supplemental brief. The Supplemental Brief<br />
contained additional briefing materials on only one of the six assignments of error. The original<br />
brief was not amended, withdrawn or disavowed in any way by the court-appointed appellate<br />
attorney.<br />
The conviction was ultimately affirmed without opinion.<br />
Mr. Flores-Salazar has not filed a civil complaint in any court against Mr. Jordan, and no<br />
judgment is forthcoming. There has been no criminal prosecution of Mr. Jordan in connection<br />
with this matter.<br />
A PLF claim is pending against Mr. Jordan in connection with this matter.<br />
Mr. Jordan’s file and time records, if any exist, are not available for review.<br />
Investigator’s Actions<br />
The investigator contacted Mr. Linn Davis in the <strong>Oregon</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> Disciplinary<br />
Counsel’s Office for information about Mr. Jordan and this claim. Mr. Davis advised the<br />
investigator that there were no time records available, Mr. Jordan’s file would not likely be<br />
available, and that Mr. Jordan would likely not be available for interview. Mr. Davis sent the<br />
investigator a timeline of Mr. Jordan’s various suspensions.<br />
The investigator obtained an OJIN print of the Clackamas County Circuit Court case in<br />
which Mr. Flores-Salazar was convicted, which was the subject of the appeal Mr. Jordan was<br />
hired to handle.