10.05.2014 Views

February 22, 2013 - Oregon State Bar

February 22, 2013 - Oregon State Bar

February 22, 2013 - Oregon State Bar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OREGON STATE BAR<br />

Board of Governors Agenda<br />

Meeting Date: <strong>February</strong> <strong>22</strong>, <strong>2013</strong><br />

From:<br />

David Wade, Chair, Governance and Strategic Planning Committee<br />

Re:<br />

Preference Polls for Circuit Court Appointments<br />

Action Recommended<br />

Approve the Governance and Strategic Planning Committee’s recommendation to<br />

resume conducting preference polls for circuit court appointments.<br />

Background<br />

Pursuant to OSB Bylaw 2.701, the bar conducts preference polls of judicial candidates<br />

for statewide and circuit court elections. Pursuant to Bylaw 2.702, preference polls for circuit<br />

court appointments are conducted only “at the request of the Governor of the <strong>State</strong> of <strong>Oregon</strong><br />

or the Board.”<br />

Since about 2005, neither the Governor nor the board has requested a poll for a circuit<br />

court appointment. Preference polls for appointments were eliminated at the same time that<br />

the BOG stopped ranking its recommendations for appellate court appointments, at the<br />

request of the then-Governor.<br />

In place of preference polls of bar members in the county/judicial district of the vacancy,<br />

the BOG has encouraged local bars to conduct an interview-based screening process similar to<br />

what the board uses for statewide judicial appointments. The Multnomah <strong>Bar</strong> Association’s<br />

judicial screening process is possibly the oldest most structured of the various county bar<br />

mechanisms. Lane and Washington Counties have similar processes, but many county bars do<br />

nothing formal in regard to the circuit court appointments.<br />

Preference polls are disfavored by some as being nothing more than “popularity<br />

contests.” Proponents counter that many (if not most) bar members take the polls seriously,<br />

making their selections based on their knowledge of the candidates and their assessment of the<br />

candidates’ respective qualifications. Particularly in counties that don’t have a screening<br />

process (or where the county bar’s screening process is perceived to be flawed), a preference<br />

poll can provide valuable information to the Governor and to the public.<br />

Preference polls are relatively easy and inexpensive for the bar to administer<br />

electronically and will not impose a significant burden on staff.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!