February 22, 2013 - Oregon State Bar

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$P:\CLEPUB\Books\Disciplinary Board Reporter ... - Oregon State Bar$

$P:\CLEPUB\Books\Disciplinary Board Reporter ... - Oregon State Bar$

OREGON STATE BAR Board of Governors Agenda Meeting Date: November 10, 2012 Memo Date: October 18, 2012 From: Matt Kehoe, Member Services Committee Chair Re: 2013 BOG and HOD Election Dates Action Recommended Approve the following proposed election dates as required by ORS 9.040 and 9.152 and recommended by the Member Services Committee. Background ORS 9.040, 9.042 and 9.152 as well as OSB Bylaw 9.1 and 5.1 outline the following dates for bar elections. OSB and ABA HOD Election Candidate statements due Friday, March 15, 2013 Ballots sent Thursday, March 28, 2013 Election (ballots due) Monday, April 15, 2013 (3 rd Monday in April) Delegates assume office Tuesday, April 16, 2013 BOG Election Candidate statements due Tuesday, May 14, 2013 (160 days before election) Challenges due Thursday, June 13, 2013 (30 days from 5/14) BOG decision on challenges Thursday, June 27, 2013 (14 days from 6/13) Petition for SC review Friday, July 12, 2013 (15 days from 6/27) Final SC decision Ballots sent Election Board Members Assume Office January 1, 2014 Friday, September 27, 2013 (10 days before ballots are sent) October 7, 2013 (1 st Monday in October) October 21, 2013 (3 rd Monday in October)
OREGON STATE BAR Board of Governors Agenda Meeting Date: November 10, 2012 From: Ann Fisher, Chair, Policy & Governance Committee Re: Amending Appellate Selection Bylaws Action Recommended Approve the P&G Committee’s recommendations for amending the OSB Bylaws to reflect the BOG’s decision to return to the pre-2005 practice of ranking its recommendations to the Governor for appellate court appointments. Background At its August 24, 2012 meeting, the BOG approved the Policy and Governance Committee’s recommendation to return to the practice of ranking the BOG’s recommendations for appellate judicial appointments. For many years prior to 2005, the BOG identified the candidates it believed were “highly qualified” for the Governor’s appellate court appointments. 1 Although the record is scant as to why the process was changed, it appears it was done to be “congruent with the Governor’s desires.” Under the current procedure, the Bar recommends those candidates it considers “suitable for consideration by the Governor.” In practice, this has meant that all candidate names are forwarded to the Governor: 1 The pre-2005 version of Bylaw 2.703 provided in pertinent part: * * * (b) The Board may make recommendations to the Governor from the pool of candidates who submit information to the Bar for appointment to fill vacant positions on the Court of Appeals, Supreme Court or the Oregon Tax Court. For a vacancy on the Oregon Tax Court, the Board will participate in the process only if requested by the Governor. The Board will recommend at least three people for the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, and not less than five names for the Oregon Tax Court, each of whom the Board believes to be highly qualified, based upon the information obtained in the review process and the following criteria: Integrity, legal knowledge and ability, professional experience, judicial temperament, diligence, health, financial responsibility and public service as defined in the ABA Guidelines for Reviewing Qualifications of Candidates. A lawyer who seeks appointment to the same position within two years of first having received a "highly qualified" rating by the Board, may ask the Board to submit his or her name to the Governor with a "highly qualified" rating without the need to submit another application or to be re-interviewed. Candidates in this category must inform the Board of any changes in information previously submitted. The Board reserves the right to request and receive additional information from any candidate prior to deciding whether to resubmit the candidate’s name to the Governor as "highly qualified." In addition to submitting its list of "highly qualified" candidates, the Board will respond to any specific request of the Governor whether certain other candidates in the pool meet a "qualified" standard. A "highly qualified" or "qualified" recommendation is intended to be objective. Failure to recommend a candidate in any particular selection process is not a finding that the person is unqualified.
Page 1 and 2:
Oregon State Bar Meeting of the Boa
Page 3 and 4:
7. Other Action Items A. Revision o
Page 5 and 6:
OREGON STATE BAR Board of Governors
Page 7 and 8:
BOG Agenda Memo — Executive Direc
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Headcount and Turnover Report Annua
Page 17 and 18:
Responsibilities The DAC’s respon
Page 19:
BOG Agenda Memo —Ira Zarov CEO PL
Page 29 and 30:
BOG Agenda Memo — Proposed Formal
Page 31 and 32:
of the representation with a person
Page 33 and 34:
the holder of the account asks for
Page 35 and 36:
Board of Governors Agenda — Propo
Page 37 and 38:
Board of Governors Agenda — Propo
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
PROPOSED OREGON RPCS 7.1 THROUGH 7.
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Report of the Advertising Task Forc
Page 55 and 56:
attempts to keep members of the pub
Page 57 and 58:
legal circumstances requires that a
Page 59 and 60:
C. From the General to the Specific
Page 61 and 62:
Exhibit A Current Oregon Rules of P
Page 63 and 64:
(c) A lawyer in private practice: (
Page 65 and 66:
Exhibit C Advertising Task Force Pr
Page 67 and 68:
persons who are not known to need l
Page 69 and 70:
2013 ONLD Master Calendar Last upda
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Board of Governors Agenda Memo —D
Page 75 and 76:
Loan Repayment Assistance Program P
Page 77 and 78:
• Report annually to the OSB Acce
Page 79 and 80:
Program participants are advised to
Page 81 and 82:
for a period of six months in the e
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
BOG Agenda Memo — CSF Claims Reco
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
BOG Agenda Memo — CSF Claim DALRY
Page 95 and 96:
Mr. Dalrymple charged me 2 times fo
Page 97 and 98:
Mr. Dalrymple's Statement on Michae
Page 99 and 100:
Date 23Jun-08 24Jun-08 25-Jun-08 30
Page 101 and 102:
Mr. Dalrymple's Statement on Michae
Page 103 and 104:
BOG Agenda Memo — CSF Claim JORDA
Page 107 and 108:
From: Chris Eggert Date: March 8, 2
Page 109:
The investigator conducted a teleph
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
BOG Agenda Memo —[Click here and
Page 116 and 117:
BOG Agenda Memo — BOG Role in Rei
Page 118 and 119:
Amendments to Reinstatement Rules o
Page 120 and 121:
(i) during the period of the member
Page 122 and 123:
(b) Judgment for Costs; Client Secu
Page 124 and 125:
Subsection 6.103 Reinstatement A fi
Page 126 and 127:
BOG Agenda Memo —[Click here and
Page 128 and 129:
PAC Bar List & Position Tracking BI
Page 130 and 131:
Bill # Relating Clause Bill Descrip
Page 132 and 133:
Bill # Relating Clause Bill Descrip
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138:
January 25, 2013 Charles N Isaak 14
Page 145 and 146: E. Director of Diversity & Inclusio
Page 147 and 148: D. Member Services Committee Mr. Ke
Page 149 and 150: Professional Liability Fund Ira R.
Page 151 and 152: 2013 PLF BUDGET, AND 2013 PRIMARY A
Page 159 and 160: -1- OREGON STATE BAR PROFESSIONAL L
Page 165 and 166: -~- OREGON STATE BAR PROFESSIONAL L
Page 167 and 168: Action Memo To: O56 Board of Govern
Page 169 and 170: Action Memo To: OSB Board of Govern
Page 171 and 172: (C) (1) Reductions to Indemniri and
Page 173 and 174: ~eoo s/zo/an; soy spe/w~ (2) A Peti
Page 175 and 176: address only issues raised in the R
Page 177 and 178: (C) The results of the evaluation w
Page 179 and 180: (b) The attorney meets with current
Page 181 and 182: (h) the attorney is not listed in t
Page 183 and 184: change during the year and Attorney
Page 185 and 186: (E) If an attorney is paying his or
Page 193 and 194: New Lawyer Mentoring Program Rule (
Page 198 and 199: Board of Governors Memo — Amendin
Page 200 and 201: Board of Governors Memo — Amendin
Page 202 and 203: Client Security Fund Rules (As appr
Page 204 and 205: OSB Client Security Fund Rules (Rev
Page 206 and 207: OSB Client Security Fund Rules (Rev
Page 208 and 209: Subsection 6.101 Active Pro Bono St
Page 210 and 211: OREGON STATE BAR Board of Governors
Page 212 and 213: BOG Consent Agenda Memo —Appointm
Page 214 and 215: State Professional Responsibility C
Page 216 and 217: Oregon State Bar Board of Governors
Page 218 and 219: Oregon State Bar Board of Governors
Page 220: Oregon State Bar Special Closed Mee
Page 224 and 225: BOG Agenda Memo February 22, 2013 P
Page 226 and 227: Minutes Budget & Finance Committee
Page 228 and 229: Minutes Budget & Finance Committee
Page 230 and 231: Minutes BOG Governance & Strategic
Page 232 and 233: MINUTES BOG Member Services Committ
Page 234 and 235: MINUTES BOG Public Affairs Committe
Page 236 and 237: BOG Agenda Memo —[Click here and
Page 238 and 239: MINUTES BOG Special Projects Commit
Page 240 and 241: CLAIM No. NAME ATTORNEY CLAIM PENDI
Page 242 and 243: 2012 ‐ 107 Lopez, Jennifer Luna M
Page 244: 2013 JUDGMENTS COLLECTED Date Attor
Page 257 and 258:
2012 Chief Legal Officer Survey An
Page 259 and 260:
INTRODUCTION The methods of cost co
Page 261 and 262:
Law School Applications Are Collaps
Page 263 and 264:
Law School Applications Are Collaps
Page 265 and 266:
Law Schools’ Applications Fall as
Page 267 and 268:
Law Schools’ Applications Fall as
Page 269 and 270:
Lawyers Behaving Badly Get A Dressi
Page 271 and 272:
Lawyers Behaving Badly Get A Dressi
Page 275 and 276:
Relax! You’ll Be More Productive
Page 277:
Relax! You’ll Be More Productive
show all

February 22, 2013 - Oregon State Bar

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?