10.05.2014 Views

February 22, 2013 - Oregon State Bar

February 22, 2013 - Oregon State Bar

February 22, 2013 - Oregon State Bar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OREGON STATE BAR<br />

Board of Governors Agenda<br />

Meeting Date: <strong>February</strong> <strong>22</strong>, <strong>2013</strong><br />

From:<br />

David Wade, Chair, Governance and Strategic Planning Committee<br />

Re:<br />

BOG Role in Reinstatements<br />

Action Recommended<br />

Approve the recommendation of the Governance and Strategic Planning Committee to<br />

delegate to the Executive Director the authority to review formal reinstatement applications in<br />

certain cases.<br />

Background<br />

There are several types of reinstatement applications, two of which can come before<br />

the BOG under existing rules:<br />

• formal applications (BR 8.1 1 ) in which lawyers seek reinstatement after more<br />

than five years of voluntary resigned or inactive status, or disciplinary suspension<br />

greater than six months. These applications are given a high degree of scrutiny<br />

by staff and are presented to the BOG for discussion. The BOG then makes a<br />

recommendation to the Supreme Court, the final decision-maker; and<br />

• informal applications (BR 8.2), in which lawyers seek reinstatement after less<br />

than five years of voluntary resigned or inactive status, or after an administrative<br />

suspension (for not complying with bar dues, PLF or IOLTA requirements) that<br />

has lasted more than six months. Staff investigation into these applications is not<br />

as comprehensive as with the formal applications and the results are submitted<br />

to the Executive Director, who can approve them if everything looks in order.<br />

The BOG reviews these application only If the ED has a question whether an<br />

applicant has the requisite character and fitness. The BOG can then either<br />

reinstate the applicant or make a recommendation to the Supreme Court that<br />

2<br />

the application be approved with conditions or denied.<br />

Currently, the BOG’s only direct participation in the regulation of lawyers is reviewing formal<br />

reinstatement applications. 3<br />

1 References are to the <strong>Bar</strong> Rules of Procedure which are adopted by the Board and approved by the Supreme<br />

Court pursuant to ORS 9.005(8) and ORS 9.542.<br />

2 BR 8.2(e) provides that: “If the Executive Director is unable to determine from a review of an informal application<br />

and any information gathered in the investigation of the application that the applicant for reinstatement has [good<br />

moral character and general fitness to practice law and that the resumption of the practice of law in this state by<br />

the applicant will not be detrimental to the administration of justice or the public interest], the Executive Director<br />

shall refer the application to the Board for consideration, with notice to the applicant.”<br />

3 The BOG participates indirectly in its general oversight of the bar’s regulatory functions and in recommending<br />

changes to the Rules of Procedure that govern disciplinary cases.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!