February 22, 2013 - Oregon State Bar
February 22, 2013 - Oregon State Bar
February 22, 2013 - Oregon State Bar
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
OREGON STATE BAR<br />
Board of Governors Agenda<br />
Meeting Date: <strong>February</strong> <strong>22</strong>, <strong>2013</strong><br />
From:<br />
David Wade, Chair, Governance and Strategic Planning Committee<br />
Re:<br />
BOG Role in Reinstatements<br />
Action Recommended<br />
Approve the recommendation of the Governance and Strategic Planning Committee to<br />
delegate to the Executive Director the authority to review formal reinstatement applications in<br />
certain cases.<br />
Background<br />
There are several types of reinstatement applications, two of which can come before<br />
the BOG under existing rules:<br />
• formal applications (BR 8.1 1 ) in which lawyers seek reinstatement after more<br />
than five years of voluntary resigned or inactive status, or disciplinary suspension<br />
greater than six months. These applications are given a high degree of scrutiny<br />
by staff and are presented to the BOG for discussion. The BOG then makes a<br />
recommendation to the Supreme Court, the final decision-maker; and<br />
• informal applications (BR 8.2), in which lawyers seek reinstatement after less<br />
than five years of voluntary resigned or inactive status, or after an administrative<br />
suspension (for not complying with bar dues, PLF or IOLTA requirements) that<br />
has lasted more than six months. Staff investigation into these applications is not<br />
as comprehensive as with the formal applications and the results are submitted<br />
to the Executive Director, who can approve them if everything looks in order.<br />
The BOG reviews these application only If the ED has a question whether an<br />
applicant has the requisite character and fitness. The BOG can then either<br />
reinstate the applicant or make a recommendation to the Supreme Court that<br />
2<br />
the application be approved with conditions or denied.<br />
Currently, the BOG’s only direct participation in the regulation of lawyers is reviewing formal<br />
reinstatement applications. 3<br />
1 References are to the <strong>Bar</strong> Rules of Procedure which are adopted by the Board and approved by the Supreme<br />
Court pursuant to ORS 9.005(8) and ORS 9.542.<br />
2 BR 8.2(e) provides that: “If the Executive Director is unable to determine from a review of an informal application<br />
and any information gathered in the investigation of the application that the applicant for reinstatement has [good<br />
moral character and general fitness to practice law and that the resumption of the practice of law in this state by<br />
the applicant will not be detrimental to the administration of justice or the public interest], the Executive Director<br />
shall refer the application to the Board for consideration, with notice to the applicant.”<br />
3 The BOG participates indirectly in its general oversight of the bar’s regulatory functions and in recommending<br />
changes to the Rules of Procedure that govern disciplinary cases.