16.05.2014 Views

Seismic Design of Tunnels - Parsons Brinckerhoff

Seismic Design of Tunnels - Parsons Brinckerhoff

Seismic Design of Tunnels - Parsons Brinckerhoff

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

locations <strong>of</strong> ro<strong>of</strong> and invert are approximately 0.26 inch and 0.17 inch for case I and case<br />

II respectively. When both soil and structure are included in the analysis, the calculated<br />

racking distortions (between the ro<strong>of</strong> and the invert) were only about 13 percent and 32<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> the free-field deformations for case I and case II, respectively (see Figures 25<br />

and 26).<br />

Conclusions. The results <strong>of</strong> the analysis lead to the following conclusions:<br />

• It may be very conservative to design a rectangular tunnel structure to accommodate<br />

all the shear deformations in the free-field, particularly when the structure is stiff and<br />

the surrounding ground is s<strong>of</strong>t. This finding coincides with results from several<br />

previous studies (Hwang and Lysmer, 1981; and TARTS, 1989).<br />

• As the relative stiffness between the soil and the structure decreases (e.g., from case<br />

II to case I), the actual structure racking deformation would also decrease, when<br />

expressed as a percentage <strong>of</strong> the free-field deformation. This suggests that the soilstructure<br />

interaction effect on the racking <strong>of</strong> a rectangular tunnel should be:<br />

-Similar to that on the ovaling <strong>of</strong> a circular tunnel (Chapter 4)<br />

-A function <strong>of</strong> the relative stiffness between the ground and the structure<br />

A series <strong>of</strong> analyses performed to define this relationship and their results are<br />

presented and discussed next.<br />

5.5 Tunnel-Ground Interaction Analysis<br />

Although closed-form solutions accounting for soil-structure interaction, such as those<br />

presented in Chapter 4, are available for deep circular lined tunnels, they are not available<br />

for rectangular tunnels due primarily to the highly variable geometrical characteristics<br />

typically associated with rectangular tunnels. Conditions become even more complex<br />

because most <strong>of</strong> the rectangular tunnels are built using the cut-and-cover method at<br />

shallow depths, where seismically induced ground distortions and stresses change<br />

significantly with depth.<br />

It is desirable, therefore, that a simple and practical procedure be developed for use<br />

by design engineers that accounts for the soil-structure interaction effect. To that end, a<br />

series <strong>of</strong> dynamic soil-structure interaction finite element analyses were performed in this<br />

study. The results from these complex analyses were then transformed so that they could<br />

be adapted easily to simple analytical tools used currently in design practice.<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!