16.05.2014 Views

Seismic Design of Tunnels - Parsons Brinckerhoff

Seismic Design of Tunnels - Parsons Brinckerhoff

Seismic Design of Tunnels - Parsons Brinckerhoff

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.3 Dynamic Earth Pressure Methods<br />

Mononobe-Okabe Method<br />

Dynamic earth pressure methods have been suggested for the evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

underground box structures by some engineers. The most popular theory for determining<br />

the increase in lateral earth pressure due to seismic effect is the Mononobe-Okabe theory<br />

described, for example, by Seed and Whitman (1970), recognized by Japanese Society <strong>of</strong><br />

Civil Engineers for earthquake resistant design <strong>of</strong> submerged tunnels (1975), and<br />

recommended in several other documents (Converse Consultants, 1983; EBMUD, 1973).<br />

Using this method, the dynamic earth pressure is assumed to be caused by the inertial<br />

force <strong>of</strong> the surrounding soils and is calculated by relating the dynamic pressure to a<br />

determined seismic coefficient and the soil properties.<br />

Originally developed for aboveground earth retaining walls, the Mononobe-Okabe<br />

method assumes that the wall structure would move and/or tilt sufficiently so that a yielding<br />

active earth wedge could form behind the wall. For a buried rectangular structural frame,<br />

the ground and the structure would move together, making it unlikely that a yielding active<br />

wedge could form. Therefore, its applicability in the seismic design <strong>of</strong> underground<br />

structures has been the subject <strong>of</strong> controversy.<br />

The obvious applicable situation is limited to the typical “boat section” (i.e., U-section)<br />

type <strong>of</strong> underground construction, where the structure configuration resembles that <strong>of</strong><br />

conventional retaining walls. Another situation where the use <strong>of</strong> the Mononobe-Okabe<br />

method may also be adequate is when the structure is located at a very shallow depth.<br />

Experience from PB’s recent underground transportation projects has indicated that the<br />

Mononobe-Okabe earth pressure, when considered as an unbalanced load, may cause a<br />

rectangular tunnel structure to rack at an amount that is greater than the deformation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

surrounding ground. This unrealistic result tends to be amplified as the depth <strong>of</strong> burial<br />

increases. This amplification is primarily due to the inertial force <strong>of</strong> the thick soil cover,<br />

which acts as a surcharge and, according to the Mononobe-Okabe method, has to be<br />

considered. In spite <strong>of</strong> this drawback, the method has been shown to serve as a<br />

reasonable safety measure against dynamic earth thrust for tunnels buried at shallow<br />

depths (e.g., in the Los Angeles Metro Project).<br />

Wood Method<br />

Another theoretical form <strong>of</strong> dynamic earth pressure was derived by Wood (1973). By<br />

assuming infinite rigidity <strong>of</strong> the wall and the foundation, Wood derived a total dynamic<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!