16.05.2014 Views

Seismic Design of Tunnels - Parsons Brinckerhoff

Seismic Design of Tunnels - Parsons Brinckerhoff

Seismic Design of Tunnels - Parsons Brinckerhoff

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• The collapse <strong>of</strong> the I-880 viaduct claimed more than 40 lives.<br />

• The direct damage costs to the transportation facilities alone totalled nearly $2 billion<br />

(Werner and Taylor, 1990).<br />

• The indirect losses were several times greater as a result <strong>of</strong> major disruptions <strong>of</strong><br />

transportation, particularly on the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge and several<br />

major segments <strong>of</strong> the Bay area highway system.<br />

The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) subway system was found to be<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the safest places during the event, and it became the only direct public<br />

transportation link between Oakland and San Francisco after the earthquake. Had BART<br />

been damaged and rendered inoperative, the consequences and impact on the Bay area<br />

would have been unthinkable.<br />

The 60-mile BART system was unscathed by the earthquake because PB engineers<br />

had the foresight 30 years ago to incorporate state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art seismic design criteria in their<br />

plans for the subway tunnels (SFBARTD, 1960; Kuesel, 1969; and Douglas and Warshaw,<br />

1971). The Loma Prieta earthquake proved the worth <strong>of</strong> their pioneering efforts.<br />

<strong>Seismic</strong> <strong>Design</strong> Before the ‘90s<br />

Based on the performance record, it is undoubtedly fair to say that underground<br />

structures are less vulnerable to earthquakes than surface structures (Dowding and<br />

Rozen, 1978; Rowe, 1992). Interestingly, some tunnels and shafts built without special<br />

earthquake provisions have survived relatively strong earthquakes in the past — for<br />

example, the Mexico City subway during the 1985 Mexico City earthquake. On the other<br />

hand, some underground structures have been damaged severely in other events (see<br />

Section 1.5).<br />

Limited progress has been made in seismic design methodology for underground<br />

tunnels since the work for BART, possibly because <strong>of</strong> favorable performance data, and<br />

limited research work has been done toward a practical solution. The lack <strong>of</strong> a rational<br />

methodology for engineers and the nonexistence <strong>of</strong> applicable codes has led to widely<br />

varied measures taken by different engineers. For example:<br />

• Some ignore seismic effects and fail to check the resistance <strong>of</strong> the structures to<br />

earthquakes, even in highly seismic areas.<br />

• Others conduct their seismic design for underground structures using the same<br />

methodology developed for aboveground structures, without recognizing that<br />

underground structures are constrained by the surrounding medium.<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!