Seismic Design of Tunnels - Parsons Brinckerhoff
Seismic Design of Tunnels - Parsons Brinckerhoff
Seismic Design of Tunnels - Parsons Brinckerhoff
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• The collapse <strong>of</strong> the I-880 viaduct claimed more than 40 lives.<br />
• The direct damage costs to the transportation facilities alone totalled nearly $2 billion<br />
(Werner and Taylor, 1990).<br />
• The indirect losses were several times greater as a result <strong>of</strong> major disruptions <strong>of</strong><br />
transportation, particularly on the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge and several<br />
major segments <strong>of</strong> the Bay area highway system.<br />
The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) subway system was found to be<br />
one <strong>of</strong> the safest places during the event, and it became the only direct public<br />
transportation link between Oakland and San Francisco after the earthquake. Had BART<br />
been damaged and rendered inoperative, the consequences and impact on the Bay area<br />
would have been unthinkable.<br />
The 60-mile BART system was unscathed by the earthquake because PB engineers<br />
had the foresight 30 years ago to incorporate state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art seismic design criteria in their<br />
plans for the subway tunnels (SFBARTD, 1960; Kuesel, 1969; and Douglas and Warshaw,<br />
1971). The Loma Prieta earthquake proved the worth <strong>of</strong> their pioneering efforts.<br />
<strong>Seismic</strong> <strong>Design</strong> Before the ‘90s<br />
Based on the performance record, it is undoubtedly fair to say that underground<br />
structures are less vulnerable to earthquakes than surface structures (Dowding and<br />
Rozen, 1978; Rowe, 1992). Interestingly, some tunnels and shafts built without special<br />
earthquake provisions have survived relatively strong earthquakes in the past — for<br />
example, the Mexico City subway during the 1985 Mexico City earthquake. On the other<br />
hand, some underground structures have been damaged severely in other events (see<br />
Section 1.5).<br />
Limited progress has been made in seismic design methodology for underground<br />
tunnels since the work for BART, possibly because <strong>of</strong> favorable performance data, and<br />
limited research work has been done toward a practical solution. The lack <strong>of</strong> a rational<br />
methodology for engineers and the nonexistence <strong>of</strong> applicable codes has led to widely<br />
varied measures taken by different engineers. For example:<br />
• Some ignore seismic effects and fail to check the resistance <strong>of</strong> the structures to<br />
earthquakes, even in highly seismic areas.<br />
• Others conduct their seismic design for underground structures using the same<br />
methodology developed for aboveground structures, without recognizing that<br />
underground structures are constrained by the surrounding medium.<br />
5