Seismic Design of Tunnels - Parsons Brinckerhoff
Seismic Design of Tunnels - Parsons Brinckerhoff
Seismic Design of Tunnels - Parsons Brinckerhoff
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3.4 <strong>Design</strong> Conforming to Free-Field Axial and Curvature<br />
Deformations<br />
Background and Assumptions<br />
The free-field ground strain equations, originally developed by Newmark (Table 1),<br />
have been widely used in the seismic design <strong>of</strong> underground pipelines. This method has<br />
also been used successfully for seismic design <strong>of</strong> long, linear tunnel structures in several<br />
major transportation projects (Monsees, 1991; Kuesel, 1969).<br />
When these equations are used, it is assumed that the structures experience the<br />
same strains as the ground in the free-field. The presence <strong>of</strong> the structures and the<br />
disturbance due to the excavation are ignored. This simplified approach usually provides<br />
an upper-bound estimate <strong>of</strong> the strains that may be induced in the structures by the<br />
traveling waves. The greatest advantage <strong>of</strong> this approach is that it requires the least<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> input.<br />
Underground pipelines, for which this method <strong>of</strong> analysis was originally developed,<br />
are flexible because <strong>of</strong> their small diameters (i.e., small bending rigidity), making the freefield<br />
deformation method a simple and reasonable design tool. For large underground<br />
structures such as tunnels, the importance <strong>of</strong> structure stiffness sometimes cannot be<br />
overlooked. Some field data indicated that stiff tunnels in s<strong>of</strong>t soils rarely experience<br />
strains that are equal to the soil strains (Nakamura, Katayama, and Kubo, 1981). A<br />
method to consider tunnel stiffness will be presented and discussed later in Section 3.5.<br />
<strong>Design</strong> Example 1: The Los Angeles Metro<br />
For the purpose <strong>of</strong> illustration, a design example modified from the seismic design<br />
criteria for the LA Metro project (SCRTD, 1984) is presented here. In this project, it was<br />
determined that a shear wave propagating at 45 degree (angle <strong>of</strong> incidence) to the tunnel<br />
axis would create the most critical axial strain within the tunnel structure. Although a P-<br />
wave (compressional wave) traveling along the tunnel axis might also produce a similar<br />
effect, it was not considered because:<br />
• Measurement <strong>of</strong> P-wave velocity can be highly misleading, particularly when a soil<br />
deposit is saturated with water (Monsees, 1991).<br />
• The magnitudes <strong>of</strong> soil strains produced by a nearly horizontally propagating P-wave<br />
are generally small and about the same as those produced in the underlying rock<br />
and, therefore, not as critical as the shear-wave generated axial strains (SFBART,<br />
1960). This phenomenon was discussed previously in Section 3.3.<br />
35