- Page 1 and 2:
1991 William Barclay Parsons Fellow
- Page 3 and 4:
CONTENTS Foreword ix 1.0 Introducti
- Page 5 and 6:
Mononobe-Okabe Method 87 Wood Metho
- Page 7 and 8:
Figure Title Page 20 Typical Free-F
- Page 9 and 10:
LIST OF TABLES Table Title Page 1 F
- Page 11 and 12:
FOREWORD For more than a century, P
- Page 13: 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
- Page 16 and 17: 1.2 Scope of this Study The work pe
- Page 18 and 19: Figure 1. Ground Response to Seismi
- Page 20 and 21: Ground Failure Ground failure broad
- Page 22 and 23: - Formation of plastic hinges at th
- Page 24 and 25: • The effects of overburden depth
- Page 27 and 28: 2.0 SEISMIC DESIGN PHILOSOPHY FOR T
- Page 29 and 30: 2.3 Seismic Design Philosophies for
- Page 31 and 32: 2.4 Proposed Seismic Design Philoso
- Page 33 and 34: expressed in terms of internal mome
- Page 35: Comments on Loading Combinations fo
- Page 39 and 40: 3.0 RUNNING LINE TUNNEL DESIGN 3.1
- Page 41 and 42: Ovaling or Racking Deformations The
- Page 43 and 44: 3.3 Free-Field Axial and Curvature
- Page 45 and 46: Simplified Equations for Axial Stra
- Page 47 and 48: 3.4 Design Conforming to Free-Field
- Page 49 and 50: Applicability of the Free-Field Def
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 6. Sectional Forces Due to C
- Page 53 and 54: - In the JSCE (Japanese Society of
- Page 55 and 56: Design Example 2: A Linear Tunnel i
- Page 57 and 58: 5. Derive the ground displacement a
- Page 59 and 60: 10. Calculate the allowable shear s
- Page 61 and 62: It is believed that the only transp
- Page 63: Based on Equations 3-7 and 3-8, the
- Page 68 and 69: The most widely used approach is to
- Page 70 and 71: 4.3 Lining Conforming to Free-Field
- Page 72 and 73: • Equation 4-4, the perforated gr
- Page 74 and 75: • The moment of inertia, I, for a
- Page 76 and 77: This rule of thumb procedure may pr
- Page 78 and 79: Figure 10. Lining Response Coeffici
- Page 80 and 81: Comments on Closed Form Solutions A
- Page 82 and 83: Thrust Response Coefficient, K 2 Fi
- Page 84 and 85: A review of Equation 4-12 and the e
- Page 86 and 87: Figure 16. Normalized Lining Deflec
- Page 88 and 89: Numerical Analysis A series of comp
- Page 90 and 91: Figure 18. Influence of Interface C
- Page 92 and 93: Figure 19. Influence of Interface C
- Page 94 and 95: Lining Stiffness, I. The results pr
- Page 97 and 98: 5.0 RACKING EFFECT ON RECTANGULAR T
- Page 99 and 100: 5.3 Dynamic Earth Pressure Methods
- Page 101 and 102: Figure 20. Typical Free-Field Racki
- Page 103 and 104: Figure 21. Structure Stability for
- Page 105 and 106: Figure 22. Soil-Structure System An
- Page 107 and 108: Figure 23. Subsurface Shear Velocit
- Page 109 and 110: Figure 24. Free-Field Shear Deforma
- Page 111 and 112: Figure 26. Structure Deformations v
- Page 113 and 114: These features are ideal for this s
- Page 115 and 116:
Figure 27. Typical Finite Element M
- Page 117 and 118:
Acceleration (g) Figure 28B. Northe
- Page 119 and 120:
Figure 30. Types of Structure Geome
- Page 121 and 122:
The shear (or flexural) stiffness o
- Page 123 and 124:
Figure 32. Determination of Racking
- Page 125 and 126:
Table 4. Cases Analyzed by Dynamic
- Page 127 and 128:
Racking Coefficient, R = D s /D fre
- Page 129 and 130:
Structure Deformation Free-Field De
- Page 131 and 132:
In each pair of analyses, the param
- Page 133 and 134:
Racking Coefficient, R Figure 36. E
- Page 135 and 136:
Table 6. Cases Analyzed to Study th
- Page 137 and 138:
(b) Derive earthquake design parame
- Page 139 and 140:
Figure 38. Simplified Frame Analysi
- Page 141 and 142:
Figure 39. Moments at Roof-Wall Con
- Page 143 and 144:
Figure 41. Moments at Roof-Wall Con
- Page 145 and 146:
frame analysis models shown in Figu
- Page 147 and 148:
6.0 SUMMARY 135
- Page 149 and 150:
6.0 SUMMARY A rational and consiste
- Page 151 and 152:
• When tunnels are embedded in un
- Page 153 and 154:
REFERENCES 141
- Page 155 and 156:
REFERENCES Agrawal, P. K., et al,
- Page 157 and 158:
Lyons, A. C., “The Design and Dev
- Page 159:
SFBARTD, “Technical Supplement to