The Pave Project Report - Queen's University Belfast

The PAVE Project Report 7
Figure 31: BDI-II scores 92
Figure 32: PDS scores 93
Figure 33: Correlations GHQ-30, BDI-II, PDS 93
Figure 34: GHQ-30 mean scores by traumatic event 100
Figure 35: BDI-II mean scores by traumatic event 101
Figure 36: PDS mean scores by traumatic event 102
Figure 37: Significant mean score differences (t-tests) between those who had
experienced a certain event & those who had not 103
Figure 38: Significant mean score differences (t-tests) between different groups
(traumatic event measures) 104
Figure 39: GHQ-30, BDI-II and PDS mean scores and standard deviations by
gender 105
Figure 40: GHQ-30, BDI-II and PDS mean scores by age 105
Figure 41: GHQ-30, BDI-II, & PDS mean scores by perceived state of health. 106
Figure 42: GHQ-30, BDI-II & PDS mean scores by use of medication 106
Figure 43: GHQ-30 mean scores by service 109
Figure 44: BDI-II mean scores by service 110
Figure 45: PDS mean scores by service 110
Figure 46: Percent of GHQ-12 scores by gender Health and Lifestyle Survey for
NI (2002). 112
Figure 47: Percent of GHQ-12 scores by gender PAVE project. 112
Figure 48: Percentage of women and men scoring 4 or more on GHQ-12. 113
Figure 49: Assessment process 119
Figure 50: Participant characteristics (A2) 120
Figure 51: Participants characteristics (A3) 121
Figure 52: Participants characteristics (A4) 122
Figure 53: GHQ-30, BDI-II, and PDS mean scores and standard deviations (A1 &
A2) 123
Figure 54: Correlations GHQ-30, BDI-II, and PDS (A1 & A2) 124
Figure 55: GHQ-30, BDI-II, and PDS mean scores and standard deviations (A1 &
A3) 124
Figure 56: Correlations GHQ-30, BDI-II, and PDS (A1 & A3) 125