TABLE OF CONTENTS - Everything R744
TABLE OF CONTENTS - Everything R744
TABLE OF CONTENTS - Everything R744
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
STRENGtHS & WEAKNESSES <strong>OF</strong> NATURAL REFRIGERANTS<br />
… average values, “NR group”<br />
… average values, “non-NR group”<br />
Environmental<br />
impact<br />
Refrigerants costs<br />
Efficiency,<br />
performance<br />
CSR, image, competitive<br />
advantage<br />
Return on<br />
Investment<br />
Compliance with<br />
legislation<br />
Reliability,<br />
compactness, weight<br />
Safety<br />
Availability of<br />
technology<br />
Capital cost<br />
Demand &<br />
composition<br />
Financial support<br />
Uniform standards<br />
Information,<br />
awareness<br />
Skilled personnel<br />
3.15<br />
3.10<br />
2.89<br />
2.85<br />
2.67<br />
2.57<br />
2.47<br />
2.35<br />
2.26<br />
2.19<br />
2.16<br />
2.11<br />
2.04<br />
2.02<br />
1.90<br />
Environmental<br />
impact<br />
Refrigerants costs<br />
Efficiency,<br />
performance<br />
CSR, image, competitive<br />
advantage<br />
Return on<br />
Investment<br />
Compliance with<br />
legislation<br />
Reliability,<br />
compactness, weight<br />
Safety<br />
Availability of<br />
technology<br />
Capital cost<br />
Demand &<br />
composition<br />
Financial support<br />
Uniform standards<br />
Information,<br />
awareness<br />
Skilled personnel<br />
2.59<br />
2.36<br />
2.32<br />
2.26<br />
2.24<br />
2.23<br />
2.05<br />
2.01<br />
1.86<br />
1.80<br />
1.79<br />
1.78<br />
1.70<br />
2.91<br />
2.83<br />
101<br />
NR GROUP<br />
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5<br />
Total responses: 245<br />
As it could be expected, for the group of respondents<br />
that already had or used products or services for<br />
natural refrigerants, the evaluation of strengths and<br />
weaknesses of natural working fluids, compared to<br />
conventional refrigerants, was more positive than for the<br />
average respondent. For all values, except for the lack of<br />
skilled personnel, the “NR group” thought that natural<br />
refrigerants were at least as competitive as conventional<br />
fluids in all areas. Again, a reduced environmental impact<br />
and low refrigerant costs were noted as clear advantages.<br />
NON-NR GROUP<br />
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0<br />
Total responses: 111<br />
Unsurprisingly, the average ranking of natural<br />
refrigerants versus conventional fluids was consistently<br />
lower than for the "NR group." However, the order<br />
of strengths and weaknesses remained the same for<br />
both groups. Respondents not yet using or offering<br />
natural refrigerant products / services estimated that<br />
conventional refrigerants would still be more competitive<br />
in five areas: the availability of trained technicians, the<br />
general awareness and availability of information, the<br />
compatibility of standards, the existing market demand<br />
and competition levels, as well as the availability of<br />
financial support.