06.06.2014 Views

TABLE OF CONTENTS - Everything R744

TABLE OF CONTENTS - Everything R744

TABLE OF CONTENTS - Everything R744

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Third place in the ranking of policy drivers that have a<br />

high impact was shared by ‘national minimum energy<br />

efficiency standards’ as well as ‘regional policies and<br />

programs (safety standards, building codes, training<br />

measures, energy efficiency).’ Nearly half of the<br />

respondents (about 47%) assessed both as having a high<br />

impact.<br />

The ranking of the most significant policy drivers remains<br />

unchanged when both high and weak impacts are<br />

considered. The ‘HCFC phase out’ and a ‘potential future<br />

agreement on an HFC phase out’ remain at the top of<br />

the ranking, with regional policies and programs (safety<br />

standards, building codes, training measures, energy<br />

efficiency) and ‘national minimum energy efficiency<br />

standards’ coming third.<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0<br />

2,3% 5,2% 3,2% 5,5% 6,3% 4,6% 5,2%<br />

4,3%<br />

4,6% 8,3%<br />

26,5%<br />

6,3% 8,9% 8,6% 17,0%<br />

29,4%<br />

41,5% 41,5% 45,8%<br />

42,1%<br />

66,9%<br />

60,8%<br />

47,0%<br />

46,1%<br />

43,2%<br />

40,9%<br />

49,0%<br />

28,8%<br />

Do not know<br />

No impact<br />

Weak impact<br />

High impact<br />

Surprisingly, expanding the list of acceptable substitutes<br />

under the US EPA ’s Significant New Alternatives Policy<br />

(SNAP) was seen as having a high impact by just 43.2%<br />

of respondents. Still, the total share of respondents that<br />

believed SNAP to have an impact - be it strong or weak –<br />

was more than three quarters (85%).<br />

Potential future global agreements or<br />

national regulations to phase down HFCs<br />

Global HCFC Phase-out & need to<br />

replace remaining HCFC installed base<br />

Voluntary industry partnerships<br />

(example: EPA GreenChill Partnership)<br />

Achieve excellence ratings, like EnergyStar,<br />

LEED etc. and benefit from associated tax breaks<br />

Expanding list of acceptable substitutes under the<br />

US EPA's Significant New Alternatives Pollicy ( SNAP)<br />

Regional Policies and Programs (safety standards,<br />

building codes, training measures, energy efficiency)<br />

National minimum energy efficiency standards<br />

47<br />

Overall, the respondents ranked the international<br />

action on HCFCs and HFCs to have a high impact on the<br />

growth of natural refrigerant market in North American<br />

countries. This goes hand in hand with the highly active<br />

role that these countries play in the Montreal Protocol<br />

negotiations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!