TABLE OF CONTENTS - Everything R744
TABLE OF CONTENTS - Everything R744
TABLE OF CONTENTS - Everything R744
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NORTH AMERICAn INDUSTRY SURVEY ON NATURAL REFRIGERANTS<br />
To quantify the market for the natural refrigerants<br />
ammonia (NH 3<br />
), carbon dioxide (CO 2<br />
), hydrocarbons<br />
(HCs), water (H 2<br />
O), and air, an online survey was sent<br />
to more than 7,000 HVAC&R professionals and relevant<br />
industry associations world-wide. The survey ran from<br />
March 6 to November 6 2012. In total, 559 responses<br />
were included in the analysis. Specific objectives of the<br />
survey were to identify expectations and priorities for the<br />
heating, refrigeration, and air-conditioning industry in<br />
North America, familiarity levels with natural refrigerants<br />
(NR), availability of NR solutions and future plans, and<br />
the potential of North America to become a world leader<br />
in natural refrigerant solutions. Moreover the survey<br />
asked about the general HVAC&R market conditions<br />
for NRs, the impact of policy on market development,<br />
key purchasing criteria for commercial end-users, and<br />
the strengths and weaknesses of NRs compared to<br />
traditional solutions.<br />
METHODOLOGY<br />
Although a global industry survey had been conducted<br />
in 2011, this new survey was the first to specifically<br />
receive only input from industry stakeholders active in<br />
Canada, Mexico, and the United States of America. The<br />
survey consisted of a mixture of up to 28 structured<br />
(closed-ended) and unstructured (open-ended)<br />
questions, depending on the question logic selected.<br />
Responses were received mainly from a list of 7,000<br />
HVAC&R industry experts from around the world, and<br />
various industry associations and voluntary initiatives,<br />
such as the GreenChill Program in the US, provided help<br />
in disseminating the survey.<br />
As the survey naturally attracted respondents who<br />
were familiar with and/or interested in natural<br />
refrigerant (NR) technology solutions, there was a clear<br />
overrepresentation of the “pro-NR” industry (actors<br />
who already offer or use NR systems). To avoid this<br />
bias as much as possible, wherever marked differences<br />
in response patterns from the total data set could be<br />
identified, both sub-sets of “pro-NR” and “non-NR” were<br />
explicitly stated and contrasted.<br />
MOST INTEREST FROM USA<br />
As previously stated the large majority of the 556<br />
respondents were located in the United States of America<br />
(80%), followed by Canada (15%) and Mexico (5%). Most<br />
organizations represented belonged to either a small<br />
organization with less than 100 staff members (40%)<br />
or a large organization with more than 500 employees<br />
(40%). Medium-sized organizations were represented to<br />
a minor extent (20%). While the US represented between<br />
84% and 89% of medium to large size companies,<br />
relatively more responses were received from smaller<br />
organizations in Canada (22%), where the USA only had<br />
a share of 70%.<br />
ENGINEERING & CONTRACTING SECTOR<br />
DOMINANT<br />
Respondents were first asked to indicate which types of<br />
activities their organization is active in; multiple choices<br />
were possible. More than one third of participants<br />
represented the engineering & contracting sector (35%),<br />
followed by a quarter from the system manufacturing<br />
business (26%), and component supplying sector<br />
(25%). Associations and marketing consultancies were<br />
significantly less represented, with values of 3% and 10%<br />
respectively. End-users made up close to one fifth of<br />
respondents (18%), whereas training & research activities<br />
were carried out by 13% of respondents. A crosstab<br />
analysis with the organization size indicated that<br />
associations, training & research, as well as consultancy<br />
& marketing were evenly distributed, accounting for<br />
the whole range of small to large organizations. On<br />
the other hand, end-users were mainly found in the<br />
“large” category, and both system manufacturers and<br />
component suppliers tended to be in the medium<br />
to large category. Only Engineering & Contracting –<br />
the strongest response group overall – was mainly<br />
represented by small companies (50% of which were in<br />
this category).<br />
COMMERCIAL REFRIGERATION LARGEST<br />
RESPONSE GROUP<br />
The largest share of respondents (61%) was "currently<br />
active" – either on the supply or demand side - in the<br />
commercial refrigeration sector. More than half of<br />
all respondents were (sometimes also) active in the<br />
industrial & commercial air-conditioning business (54%)<br />
and in industrial refrigeration (53%). This high response<br />
rate from the commercial and industrial refrigeration<br />
business was to be expected, given the extended use of<br />
ammonia in industrial plants and the renewed interest in<br />
natural working fluids in supermarket applications.<br />
Slightly less pronounced were activities in the lightcommercial<br />
refrigeration sector. Mobile air conditioning<br />
(20%) and transport refrigeration (19%) attracted the<br />
lowest response rate. This was not surprising, given that<br />
these industry sectors have adopted natural refrigerants<br />
only to a minor extent. The industrial, commercial, and<br />
residential heating sectors, as well as the domestic<br />
refrigeration and residential air-conditioning sectors,<br />
ranged from a 23% to 38% response rate. Again,<br />
respondents could select multiple options.<br />
88