PDF, 3.8 MB - Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

134 Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Reasons (Michigan) (Unweighted Percentages) Total Count % Refusal Cases 523 100.00 Nothing in it for me 315 60.23 No time 77 14.72 Government/Surveys too invasive 80 15.30 Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation 6 1.15 Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns 19 3.63 House too messy/Too ill 4 0.76 Other 22 4.21 Missing 0 0.00 (Weighted Percentages) Total Count % Refusal Cases 523 100.00 Nothing in it for me 315 60.36 No time 77 14.57 Government/Surveys too invasive 80 15.30 Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation 6 1.09 Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns 19 3.66 House too messy/Too ill 4 0.74 Other 22 4.27 Missing 0 0.00 Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Reasons (Minnesota) (Unweighted Percentages) Total Count % Refusal Cases 92 100.00 Nothing in it for me 50 54.35 No time 11 11.96 Government/Surveys too invasive 15 16.30 Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation 4 4.35 Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns 10 10.87 House too messy/Too ill 0 0.00 Other 2 2.17 Missing 0 0.00 (Weighted Percentages) Total Count % Refusal Cases 92 100.00 Nothing in it for me 50 52.83 No time 11 12.65 Government/Surveys too invasive 15 16.72 Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation 4 4.49 Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns 10 10.64 House too messy/Too ill 0 0.00 Other 2 2.66 Missing 0 0.00
135 Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Reasons (Mississippi) (Unweighted Percentages) Total Count % Refusal Cases 48 100.00 Nothing in it for me 23 47.92 No time 7 14.58 Government/Surveys too invasive 13 27.08 Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation 0 0.00 Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns 5 10.42 House too messy/Too ill 0 0.00 Other 0 0.00 Missing 0 0.00 (Weighted Percentages) Total Count % Refusal Cases 48 100.00 Nothing in it for me 23 48.12 No time 7 14.51 Government/Surveys too invasive 13 26.99 Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation 0 0.00 Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns 5 10.38 House too messy/Too ill 0 0.00 Other 0 0.00 Missing 0 0.00 Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Reasons (Missouri) (Unweighted Percentages) Total Count % Refusal Cases 89 100.00 Nothing in it for me 60 67.42 No time 9 10.11 Government/Surveys too invasive 8 8.99 Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation 0 0.00 Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns 9 10.11 House too messy/Too ill 2 2.25 Other 1 1.12 Missing 0 0.00 (Weighted Percentages) Total Count % Refusal Cases 89 100.00 Nothing in it for me 60 67.79 No time 9 10.37 Government/Surveys too invasive 8 8.80 Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation 0 0.00 Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns 9 9.77 House too messy/Too ill 2 2.18 Other 1 1.09 Missing 0 0.00
Page 1 and 2:
2003 National Survey on Drug Use an
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents Chapter Page List
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents (continued) Chapt
Page 7 and 8:
List of Tables (continued) Table 6.
Page 9 and 10:
List of Tables (continued) Table 7.
Page 11 and 12:
List of Exhibits Exhibit 2.1 2003 N
Page 13 and 14:
1. Introduction The 2003 National S
Page 15 and 16:
2. Sampling and Counting/Listing Op
Page 17 and 18:
segment it was apparent the segment
Page 19 and 20:
working in and around their campuse
Page 21 and 22:
Exhibit 2.1 2003 NSDUH Sample Desig
Page 23 and 24:
Table 2.1 Sampling Summary of 2003
Page 25 and 26:
3. Data Collection Staffing The mag
Page 27 and 28:
The work of an interviewer requires
Page 29 and 30:
quarter to quarter varied, so FSs h
Page 31 and 32:
Exhibit 3.1 NSDUH Management Chart
Page 33 and 34:
Exhibit 3.3 Flow of FI Recruiting A
Page 35 and 36:
Exhibit 3.3 Flow of FI Recruiting A
Page 37 and 38:
4. Preparation of Survey Materials
Page 39 and 40:
• NSDUH Guide Book: This guideboo
Page 41 and 42:
• Quality Control Forms specifica
Page 43 and 44:
• Supplies to be used during trai
Page 45 and 46:
Switching the Industry and Occupati
Page 47 and 48:
Exhibit 4.1 2003 Newton Updates (co
Page 49 and 50:
Exhibit 4.1 2003 Newton Updates (co
Page 51 and 52:
Exhibit 4.2 2003 CAI Changes (conti
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55:
Page 58 and 59:
All trainees were required to pass
Page 60 and 61:
5.2.3.2 Day 2 Day 2 included a gene
Page 62 and 63:
• Through the developed training
Page 64 and 65:
consisted of an FS Team Meeting in
Page 66 and 67:
Table 5.2 Results from Home Study a
Page 68 and 69:
Exhibit 5.1 Daily Trainee Evaluatio
Page 70 and 71:
Exhibit 5.2 Mentoring Instructions
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
included in the Showcard Booklet fo
Page 78 and 79:
usually attributed to breakoffs occ
Page 80 and 81:
participation. Supervisors sometime
Page 82 and 83:
6.8.2 Interviewing Staff Attrition
Page 84 and 85:
Table 6.1 2003 NSDUH CAI Audit Trai
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Table 6.11 2003 NSDUH CAI Audit Tra
Page 96 and 97: Table 6.13 2003 NSDUH CAI Audit Tra
Page 116 and 117: 104
Page 118 and 119: Tables 7.18 and 7.19 present, in al
Page 120 and 121: Table 7.2 2003 Screening Results, b
Page 122 and 123: Table 7.4 2003 Screening Results, b
Page 124 and 125: Table 7.6 2003 Screening Results
Page 128 and 129: 116 Table 7.8 2003 Screening Result
Page 134 and 135: Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening
Page 136 and 137: 124 Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screen
Page 162 and 163: Table 7.17 2003 Interview Results,
Page 164 and 165: 152 Table 7.18 and 7.19 2003 Interv
Page 196 and 197:
184 Table 7.18 and 7.19 2003 Interv
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Table 7.20 and 7.21 2003 Interview
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320 and 321:
Table 7.24 2003 Interview Results,
Page 322 and 323:
Page 324 and 325:
Page 326 and 327:
Page 328 and 329:
Page 330 and 331:
Page 332 and 333:
320 Table 7.28 2003 Interview Resul
Page 334 and 335:
321-A Table 7.29 2003 Interview Res
Page 336 and 337:
Table 7.32 2003 English and Spanish
Page 338 and 339:
Table 7.34 2003 Interviewer's Asses
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
Page 344 and 345:
8. Quality Control While every step
Page 346 and 347:
quality errors, and willingness to
Page 348 and 349:
• Status and Result Code (record
Page 350 and 351:
8.4.1 In-house Verification Verific
Page 352 and 353:
Data Quality Team and the FS, RS, a
Page 354 and 355:
Table 8.1 2003 NSDUH FI Exit Interv
Page 356 and 357:
Exhibit 8.1 Steps to Maximize Data
Page 358 and 359:
Exhibit 8.2 2003 NSDUH Field Interv
Page 360 and 361:
Exhibit 8.2 2003 NSDUH Field Interv
Page 362 and 363:
Exhibit 8.3. Field Interviewer Exit
Page 364 and 365:
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Exhibit 8.5 Overview of NSDUH Inter
Page 370 and 371:
Exhibit 8.6 Quality Control Form (c
Page 372 and 373:
Exhibit 8.8 Short FI Level Verifica
Page 374 and 375:
Exhibit 8.9 Short FI Level Verifica
Page 376 and 377:
Exhibit 8.10 Short FI Level Verific
Page 378 and 379:
Appendix A New-to-Project Home Stud
Page 380 and 381:
TO: FROM: SUBJECT: New-to-Project F
Page 382 and 383:
Because of the importance we attach
Page 384 and 385:
Appendix B New-to-Project Home Stud
Page 386 and 387:
FI NAME: __________________________
Page 388 and 389:
11. What is the Block Listing Map u
Page 390 and 391:
24. It is possible for the HU scree
Page 392 and 393:
Questions 38-40: Described below ar
Page 394 and 395:
2003 National Survey on Drug Use an
Page 396 and 397:
16. If the screen on your Newton ha
Page 398 and 399:
Appendix C Veteran Home Study Cover
Page 400 and 401:
DATE: December 4, 2002 TO: FROM: 20
Page 402 and 403:
The 2003 Veteran Training Conferenc
Page 404 and 405:
Items You Must Bring to Training 20
Page 406 and 407:
Appendix D Veteran Home Study Exerc
Page 408 and 409:
2003 NSDUH Veteran Training Confere
Page 410 and 411:
Q9. Which of the following is NOT t
Page 412 and 413:
Q24. There is no wrong answer to th
Page 414 and 415:
Appendix E Verification Scripts
Page 416 and 417:
Verification Script for Code 70 Gen
Page 418 and 419:
Screening Script: >UNDR18AA< In rec
Page 420 and 421:
We would like to ask this teen a fe
Page 422 and 423:
A1B< >A1C< >A2A< >A2AELB1< Were you
Page 424 and 425:
A4< Did you complete a short set of
Page 426 and 427:
ELB1A< >MPAY< >MPAY2< Would you ple
Page 428 and 429:
Verification Script for Code 30 Gen
Page 430 and 431:
B1A< >B1AELB1< >B1B< >B1C< How were
Page 432 and 433:
B2< According to our interviewer, t
Page 434 and 435:
Screening Information Provided for
Page 436 and 437:
NORES2C< >SPEAKCC1AC2ELB1< >IPRFC< >ELB1C< >DONE
Page 442 and 443:
Screening Script: >INTRO1D< May I s
Page 444 and 445:
SPEAKD2< May I speak with this pers
Page 446 and 447:
D1_13B< >D1_13C< >D1_18A< >D1_18B<
Page 448 and 449:
D1_26D< >D1_26E< >D1_26F< >D2< (Wil
Page 450 and 451:
Appendix F Census Bureau Industry a
Page 452 and 453:
Industry and Occupation Coding Over
Page 454 and 455:
Table F.2 2003 NSDUH Industry and O
show all

PDF, 3.8 MB - Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?