11.07.2014 Views

Nevada Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Reference Case Projections

Nevada Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Reference Case Projections

Nevada Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Reference Case Projections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FINAL <strong>Nevada</strong> GHG <strong>Inventory</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Reference</strong> <strong>Case</strong> Projection<br />

CCS, July 2007<br />

The Clark County Department of Air Quality <strong>and</strong> Environmental Management (DAQEM) <strong>and</strong><br />

Washoe County District Health Department have permitting authority over air pollution sources<br />

in their respective counties. Washoe County confirmed that they do not have any industrial<br />

processes covered by the EIIP guidance.<br />

The Clark County DAQEM provided production data for one lime manufacturing plant for 1999,<br />

2000, 2001, <strong>and</strong> 2003. The Clark County DAQEM indicated that it had one cement plant, which<br />

closed in 2004 <strong>and</strong> which produced clinker, but was unable to identify any production data for<br />

the plant. The Clark County DAQEM noted that it has one titanium metals plant that uses<br />

magnesium in a reduction furnace for purifying titanium, but it was not clear if this process is a<br />

source of SF 6 emissions. Otherwise, Clark County does not have any other industrial processes<br />

covered by the EIIP guidance.<br />

Results<br />

Figures D1 <strong>and</strong> D2 show historic <strong>and</strong> projected emissions for the <strong>Nevada</strong> industrial processes<br />

sector from 1990 to 2020. Total gross GHG emissions were about 2.1 MMTCO 2 e in 2000 (4.6%<br />

of total emissions), rising to about 4.6 MMTCO 2 e in 2020 (6.4% of total emissions). Emissions<br />

from the overall industrial processes category are expected to grow rapidly, as shown in Figures<br />

D1 <strong>and</strong> D2, with emissions growth almost entirely due to the increasing use of HFCs <strong>and</strong> PFCs<br />

in refrigeration <strong>and</strong> air conditioning equipment, <strong>and</strong>, to a lesser extent, as a result of emissions of<br />

CO 2 associated with the production of lime <strong>and</strong> cement.<br />

Substitutes for Ozone-Depleting Substances (ODS)<br />

HFCs <strong>and</strong> PFCs are used as substitutes for ODS, most notably chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs [CFCs<br />

are also potent warming gases]) in compliance with the Montreal Protocol <strong>and</strong> the Clean Air Act<br />

Amendments of 1990. 50 Even low amounts of HFC <strong>and</strong> PFC emissions, for example, from leaks<br />

<strong>and</strong> other releases associated with normal use of the products, can lead to high GHG emissions<br />

on a carbon-equivalent basis. Emissions from the use of ODS substitutes in <strong>Nevada</strong> were<br />

calculated using the default methods in SGIT (see dark green line in Figure D2). Emissions have<br />

increased from 0.0017 MMtCO 2 e in 1990 to about 0.54 MMtCO 2 e in 2000, <strong>and</strong> are expected to<br />

increase at an average rate of 8.0% per year from 2000 to 2020 due to increased substitutions of<br />

these gases for ODS. The projected rate of increase for these emissions is based on projections<br />

for national emissions from the US EPA report referenced in Table D2.<br />

Electricity Distribution<br />

Emissions of SF 6 from electrical equipment have experienced declines since the early-nineties<br />

(see brown line in Figure D2), mostly due to voluntary action by industry. SF 6 is used as an<br />

electrical insulator <strong>and</strong> interrupter in electricity T&D systems. Emissions for <strong>Nevada</strong> from 1990<br />

to 2002 were estimated based on the estimates of emissions per kWh from the U.S. EPA GHG<br />

inventory <strong>and</strong> on <strong>Nevada</strong>’s electricity consumption estimates provided in SGIT. The U.S.<br />

50 As noted in EIIP Chapter 6, ODS substitutes are primarily associated with refrigeration <strong>and</strong> air conditioning, but<br />

also have many other uses including as fire control agents, cleaning solvents, aerosols, foam blowing agents, <strong>and</strong> in<br />

sterilization applications. The applications, stocks, <strong>and</strong> emissions of ODS substitutes depend on technology<br />

characteristics in a range of equipment. For the US national inventory, a detailed stock vintaging model was used,<br />

but this modeling approach has not been completed at the state level.<br />

<strong>Nevada</strong> Division of 46 Center for Climate Strategies<br />

Environmental Protection<br />

www.climatestrategies.us

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!