14.07.2014 Views

second year course outlines 2012-2013 - School of Social Sciences ...

second year course outlines 2012-2013 - School of Social Sciences ...

second year course outlines 2012-2013 - School of Social Sciences ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

https://login.manchester.ac.uk/cas/login. Originally published in American Philosophical<br />

Quarterly 13 (1976) 145-52. Reprinted in Crane and Farkas (eds) Metaphysics; P. Van<br />

Inwagen and D. Zimmerman (eds) Metaphysics. The Big Questions; Le Poidevin and<br />

MacBeath (eds) Philosophy <strong>of</strong> Time; also in Lewis’s Philosophical Papers, vol 2.<br />

Further Primary Reading<br />

Kadri Vihvelin, ‘What Time Travelers Cannot Do’, Philosophical Studies, Vol. 81 (1996), pp.<br />

315-<br />

330, online at: http://www.springerlink.com/content/q6l51147w06k3867/; and available on<br />

the <strong>course</strong> website. See also Vihvelin’s philosophy blog here:<br />

http://vihvelin.typepad.com/vihvelincom/<br />

Kadri Vihvelin, ‘Two Objections to the Possibility <strong>of</strong> Time Travel’, at Vihvelin’s blog:<br />

http://vihvelin.typepad.com/vihvelincom/2011/05/two-objections-to-the-possibility-<strong>of</strong>-timetravel.html<br />

Theodore Sider, ‘Time Travel, Coincidences and Counterfactuals’, Philosophical Studies 110<br />

(2002): 115-38; also available on Ted Sider’s website: http://tedsider.org/<br />

M. Lockwood, The Labyrinth <strong>of</strong> Time, ch7<br />

Paul Horwich, Asymmetries in Time, ch7<br />

Further Secondary Reading<br />

Earl Conee and Theodore Sider, Riddles <strong>of</strong> Existence, ch3 (esp. pp. 57-61)<br />

E.J. Lowe, A Survey <strong>of</strong> Metaphysics, ch18<br />

B. Dainton, Time and Space, ch8<br />

Schwartz, ch. 6<br />

7. SAMPLE EXAM PAPER (for guidance only)<br />

1. Are all necessary truths knowable a priori? Discuss with reference to Kripke.<br />

2. Is Frege right to maintain that a sign can have sense without having reference?<br />

3. Critically assess the logical positivists’ verification theory <strong>of</strong> meaning.<br />

4. Are token mental events identical with token physical events? Discuss with reference<br />

to Davidson.<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!