17.07.2014 Views

Strangers to Sisters - Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary Library: Essays

Strangers to Sisters - Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary Library: Essays

Strangers to Sisters - Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary Library: Essays

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

different forms of church organization the right <strong>to</strong> be called<br />

Ekklesia, if only they use the Word and Sacraments. 262<br />

Lillegard also asserts that there are three points of clear biblical teaching regarding the<br />

local congregation and the synod that all <strong>Lutheran</strong>s must agree upon:<br />

1.) We have the biblical precept and example for the<br />

gathering of Christians in local assemblies, <strong>to</strong> hear the<br />

preaching of the Word, use the Sacraments, exercise<br />

evangelical discipline, etc. But we have no precept or<br />

rules telling us just what form of organization should be<br />

adopted by these assemblies, - the kind of offices and<br />

the number of officers differing greatly the various<br />

places and the various times, according <strong>to</strong> the<br />

circumstances. There is but one rule: “Let all things be<br />

done decently and in order.”<br />

2.) We have biblical precept and example pointing <strong>to</strong> the<br />

need and duty of maintaining fraternal relationship with<br />

other orthodox Christians in other places, both far and<br />

near. We have also both precept and example as <strong>to</strong> the<br />

kind of activities this larger fellowship should<br />

undertake; settling doctrinal disputes, helping brethren<br />

in need, arranging for missionary activity, etc. But we<br />

have no precepts or rules covering the organization of<br />

this larger fellowship, what kind of machinery it is <strong>to</strong><br />

set up, what officers it should have, etc.<br />

3.) Any form of teaching or system of organization that<br />

robs the individual of his rights and privileges as “a<br />

royal priest” whether on the local or wider level, is on<br />

the face of it wrong. “Sovereignty” is an attribute of the<br />

individual Christian; only because he knows no other<br />

master than the Lord himself can sovereignty be<br />

ascribed also <strong>to</strong> the local congregation <strong>to</strong> which he<br />

belongs. 263<br />

Kretzmann would not sit still for this. In a rebuttal <strong>to</strong> Lillegard’s objections,<br />

Kretzmann fired back, basically reiterating his chief points with more fire than before.<br />

But Lillegard again points out that Kretzmann’s arguments are not in keeping with the<br />

clear text of Scripture. First he makes it clear that the English word “church” or<br />

262 George, Lillegard, “Some Objections <strong>to</strong> the Meaning of Ekklesia Considered” Clergy Bulletin 9, no. 6<br />

(February 1950), 51-53.<br />

263 Lillegard, Some Objections, 53.<br />

142

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!