Hugo Gamber <strong>to</strong> C.M. Gullerud, letter, December 5, 1951, ELS Presidential Files: 1950s – The Fehner File. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. Hugo Gamber <strong>to</strong> C.M. Gullerud, letter, February 19, 1953, ELS Presidential Files: 1950s – The Fehner File. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. Hugo Gamber <strong>to</strong> C.M. Gullerud, letter, February 27, 1951, ELS Presidential Files: 1950s – The Fehner File. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. Hugo Gamber <strong>to</strong> C.M. Gullerud, letter, January 20, 1951, ELS Presidential Files: 1950s – The Fehner File. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. Hugo Gamber <strong>to</strong> C.M. Gullerud, letter, May 23, 1953, ELS Presidential Files: 1950s – The Fehner File. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. Hugo Gamber <strong>to</strong> C.M. Gullerud, letter, May 27, 1953, ELS Presidential Files: 1950s – The Fehner File. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. Hugo Gamber <strong>to</strong> C.M. Gullerud, letter, November 19, 1951, ELS Presidential Files: 1950s – The Fehner File. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. Hugo Gamber <strong>to</strong> C.M. Gullerud, letter, November 21, 1952, ELS Presidential Files: 1950s – The Fehner File. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. Hugo Gamber <strong>to</strong> C.M. Gullerud, letter, Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 8, 1952, ELS Presidential Files: 1950s – The Fehner File. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. Hugo Gamber <strong>to</strong> C.M. Gullerud, letter, September 9, 1950, ELS Presidential Files: 1950s – The Fehner File. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. Hugo Gamber <strong>to</strong> C.M.Gullerud, letter, November 21, 1950, ELS Presidential Files: 1950s – The Fehner File. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. J.A.O. Preus <strong>to</strong> Alvin Fehner, letter, May 10, 1950, ELS Presidential Files: 1950s – The Fehner File. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. J.A.O. Preus <strong>to</strong> Alvin Fehner, letter, May 4, 1950, ELS Presidential Files: 1950s – The Fehner File. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. J.E. Thoen <strong>to</strong> G.A. Gullixson, letter, February 5, 1926, ELS Presidential Files: 1920s. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. John Brenner <strong>to</strong> H. Ingebritson, letter, January 20, 1939, John Brenner Collection, File #173. <strong>Wisconsin</strong> Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Mequon WI. 204
John Brenner <strong>to</strong> Norman Madson, letter, February 1, 1942, ELS Presidential Files: 1940s. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. John Brenner <strong>to</strong> Norman Madson, letter, Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 11, 1941, John Brenner Collection, File #156. <strong>Wisconsin</strong> Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Mequon, WI. John Brenner <strong>to</strong> S.C. Ylvisaker, letter, June 6, 1950, John Brenner Collection, File #173. <strong>Wisconsin</strong> Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Mequon, WI. John Buenger <strong>to</strong> Norman Madson, letter, July 2, 1948, Norman Madson Papers, Correspondence 1948, B.2., XIII 40. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. John Buenger <strong>to</strong> Norman Madson, letter, June 13, 1947. Norman Madson Papers, Correspondence 1947, B.2., XII 49. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. John Buenger <strong>to</strong> Norman Madson, letter, May 31, 1948. Norman Madson Papers, Correspondence 1948, B.2., XIII 32. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. John P. Meyer <strong>to</strong> Norman Madson, letter, July 22, 1938, ELS Presidential Files: 1930s. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. John P. Meyer <strong>to</strong> Norman Madson, letter, March 23, 1944. Norman Madson Papers, Correspondence 1944, B.2., X.11. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. John P. Meyer <strong>to</strong> Norman Madson, letter, May 15, 1944. Norman Madson Papers, Correspondence 1944, B.2., X.33. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. John P. Meyer <strong>to</strong> Norman Madson, letter, November 23, 1948. Norman Madson Papers, Correspondence 1948, B.2., XIII 59. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. Joseph Petersen <strong>to</strong> Oscar Naumann, letter, November 14, 1964, ELS Presidential File: 1960s. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. Julius Bergholz <strong>to</strong> H.M. Tjernagel, letter, December 7, 1925, ELS Presidential Files: 1920s. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. Leroy Hurry and Darell Apitz <strong>to</strong> C.M. Gullerud, letter, March 12, 1953, ELS Presidential Files: 1950s – The Fehner File. Evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> Synod Archives, Manka<strong>to</strong>, MN. 205
- Page 1 and 2:
WISCONSIN LUTHERAN SEMINARY STRANGE
- Page 3 and 4:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to gra
- Page 5 and 6:
Yet, the Norwegian Synod suffered h
- Page 7 and 8:
constitution, the reference to the
- Page 9 and 10:
Minnesota had reservations about th
- Page 11 and 12:
these two synods into closer contac
- Page 13 and 14:
Part I: Getting to know the Scriptu
- Page 15 and 16:
strengthening and encouraging the f
- Page 17 and 18:
University of Leipzig. 18 His main
- Page 19 and 20:
voice, as in an ecstasy, breathed t
- Page 21 and 22:
unbelief, in recent times such men
- Page 23 and 24:
So will we cling fast to the Lord m
- Page 25 and 26:
Koren sees Kierkegaard as a one who
- Page 27 and 28:
We acknowledge with gratitude towar
- Page 29 and 30:
Of the founders of the Norwegian Sy
- Page 31 and 32:
The Election Controversy was really
- Page 33 and 34:
ule or judge in matters of faith, n
- Page 35 and 36:
The Norwegian Synod lived its motto
- Page 37 and 38:
are sitting, like ourselves, theore
- Page 39 and 40:
we do? Why stand aloof against a cu
- Page 41 and 42:
that poor, unscriptural hermeneutic
- Page 43 and 44:
congregation, not us listeners.”
- Page 45 and 46:
elieve for them, such as is the cas
- Page 47 and 48:
Chapter 2 The Wauwatosa Theology Th
- Page 49 and 50:
Hoenecke developed and passed on to
- Page 51 and 52:
Third, one dare not limit this auth
- Page 53 and 54:
For Hoenecke, the way we let Script
- Page 55 and 56:
It may never be forgotten, that the
- Page 57 and 58:
inging unity to the various Luthera
- Page 59 and 60:
A fuller analysis of the Wauwatosa
- Page 61 and 62:
One of the chief terms used by orth
- Page 63 and 64:
None of this is to say the Wauwatos
- Page 65 and 66:
the church unperverted. It thus has
- Page 67 and 68:
synods over the years. But as will
- Page 69 and 70:
We believe it best to wait until 19
- Page 71 and 72:
Finally, the doctrinal controversie
- Page 73 and 74:
E.B. Schluetter, and delivered the
- Page 75 and 76:
students. Ylvisaker had resigned hi
- Page 77 and 78:
teaching English, Norse, Latin, Alg
- Page 79 and 80:
Waltonite, and scare ‘em into ret
- Page 81 and 82:
DMLC were fraternal visitors at the
- Page 83 and 84:
accepted a call to serve his sister
- Page 85 and 86:
experiment never really took off, p
- Page 87 and 88:
point. Bethany had not been entrust
- Page 89 and 90:
the internal shake-up at Bethany an
- Page 91 and 92:
growing tense, not only among those
- Page 93 and 94:
ehind the back of the Wisconsin Syn
- Page 95 and 96:
With such deep sentiments and histo
- Page 97 and 98:
weight around, intruded upon a very
- Page 99 and 100:
Tjernagel contends vehemently that
- Page 101 and 102:
of the ELS, as well as her wariness
- Page 103 and 104:
Paul, MN the possibility Ohio and I
- Page 105 and 106:
Take for instance the procedure ado
- Page 107 and 108:
meeting has lapsed, I am forced in
- Page 109 and 110:
Dear Gullixson! I had just sat down
- Page 111 and 112:
to them what they should speak and
- Page 113 and 114:
conferences. By entering into a rel
- Page 115 and 116:
Chapter 2 Relations confirmed and s
- Page 117 and 118:
sent out by a Chicago group, I shal
- Page 119 and 120:
have good reasons to refrain for ex
- Page 121 and 122:
Tjernagel: Today conditions have be
- Page 123 and 124:
At the Synodical Conference convent
- Page 125 and 126:
The ELS, in her desire to mediate a
- Page 127 and 128:
Such remarks are telling not only o
- Page 129 and 130:
America, Elling Eielsen. Eielsen in
- Page 131 and 132:
But even the faithful few who had l
- Page 133 and 134:
establishes all functions of the mi
- Page 135 and 136:
2.) By virtue of the work they do,
- Page 137 and 138:
Scripture. 257 The ELS, due to its
- Page 139 and 140:
Wisconsin, ELS and the faithful of
- Page 141 and 142:
Lillegard was the foremost exegete
- Page 143 and 144:
“congregation” has a much narro
- Page 145 and 146:
this is definitely a Lutheran princ
- Page 147 and 148:
What makes the testimony and defens
- Page 149 and 150:
terms. He is persuaded now that the
- Page 151 and 152:
III. The Fehner Case (1949-1953) Th
- Page 153 and 154: Immanuel during a difficult time. B
- Page 155 and 156: there would not be any scouting at
- Page 157 and 158: Bethany Lutheran College and the Ev
- Page 159 and 160: The trouble makers had then proceed
- Page 161 and 162: pro and some con. To make matters w
- Page 163 and 164: congregation, and that our privileg
- Page 165 and 166: cease such offensive practice.” 3
- Page 167 and 168: teachings of these revered teachers
- Page 169 and 170: pastor’s point of view, that both
- Page 171 and 172: How much of this can be attributed
- Page 173 and 174: alarming rate. The water of controv
- Page 175 and 176: where the one advocating them refus
- Page 177 and 178: Reim: challenges Harms’ limitatio
- Page 179 and 180: gave public testimony to the interc
- Page 181 and 182: efusing to accept the Brief Stateme
- Page 183 and 184: Yet, there does remain a present va
- Page 185 and 186: ecclesiastical details or the weigh
- Page 187 and 188: The study of this era shows that th
- Page 189 and 190: BIBLIOGRAPHY Books Aaberg, Theodore
- Page 191 and 192: Schroeder, Morton A Time to Remembe
- Page 193 and 194: http://www.blts.edu/essays/korenUV/
- Page 195 and 196: Ylvisaker, S.C. “The National Lut
- Page 197 and 198: Harstad, Bjug. “Sermon of Genesis
- Page 199 and 200: Zimmermann, Paul. “Scripture Inte
- Page 201 and 202: C.M. Gullerud to Hugo Gamber, lette
- Page 203: Gervasius Fischer to C.M. Gullerud,
- Page 207 and 208: Minutes of the Meeting of The Commi
- Page 209 and 210: Oscar Naumann to C.M. Gullerud, let
- Page 211: Stuart Dorr to the pastors of the N