17.07.2014 Views

Strangers to Sisters - Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary Library: Essays

Strangers to Sisters - Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary Library: Essays

Strangers to Sisters - Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary Library: Essays

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

his<strong>to</strong>ric <strong>Lutheran</strong> position and had it published in the June 1951 edition of the<br />

Confessional <strong>Lutheran</strong>. It was entitled, oddly enough, “A Friendly Word <strong>to</strong> our Brethren<br />

in the <strong>Wisconsin</strong> Synod.”<br />

In the article, Buenger accused the <strong>Wisconsin</strong> Synod of revising and developing<br />

truth that had been laid out clearly in the Confessions. 265<br />

He further accused the<br />

<strong>Wisconsin</strong> Synod of teaching that gathering <strong>to</strong>gether in congregation is a matter of<br />

Christian liberty, that the <strong>Wisconsin</strong> Synod gave any chance gathering of Christians the<br />

right <strong>to</strong> excommunicate, and that the Synod had power over the local congregation. 266 He<br />

asserted, among other things, that all the truth of Scripture is clearly expounded upon by<br />

the <strong>Lutheran</strong> fathers, that the <strong>Lutheran</strong> Confessions taught only the pas<strong>to</strong>r of a local<br />

congregation is divinely ordained and that synods are merely man-made institutions. 267<br />

The article caused such uproar in the ELS that a resolution was passed by the<br />

General Pas<strong>to</strong>ral Conference <strong>to</strong> not only publish Buenger’s essay in the Clergy Bulletin,<br />

but also publish George Lillegard’s rebuttal. This brief reply by Lillegard not only clearly<br />

and evangelically corrects the false caricatures of the <strong>Wisconsin</strong> Synod positions on<br />

church and ministry, but defends the hermeneutical methods that were used in the<br />

formulation of the <strong>Wisconsin</strong> Synod positions. Lillegard clearly sides with the<br />

Wauwa<strong>to</strong>sa methodology in approaching the Scriptures against the Vatertheologie<br />

advocated by Buenger,<br />

Under “Quoting the Fathers in Controversy,” the writer<br />

[Buenger] tries <strong>to</strong> make out that professors Koehler and<br />

Pieper followed a wrong principle when they warned<br />

against basing doctrine on statements of “the fathers” rather<br />

than on Scripture alone. The fact remains, however, that<br />

265 George Lillegard, “Church and Ministry” Clergy Bulletin 11, no. 1 (September 1951), 3-6.<br />

266 Ibid.<br />

267 Ibid.<br />

144

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!