Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
—<br />
^^ /%?^fe?^ ^^:^Z^/^^ /^^^^^^<br />
THE NATIONAL<br />
FILM WEEKLY<br />
Published in Nine Sectional Editions<br />
BEN SHLYEN<br />
Editor-in-Chief<br />
and Publisher<br />
JAMES M. JERAULD Editor<br />
NATHAN COHEN.... Executive Editor<br />
(ESSE SHLYEN Managing Editor<br />
IVAN SPEAR Western Editor<br />
KEN HUDNALL. Equipment Editor<br />
JOHN G. TINSLEY..Advertising Mgr.<br />
Published Every Saturday by<br />
ASSOCIATED PUBLICATIONS<br />
Editorial Offices: 9 Itoclicfellcr I'laza, New<br />
Vorli 20, N. Y. Jolin G. Tlnsley. Advertising<br />
.ManjBcr; James M. Jerauld, Editor;<br />
Chtsler Friedman, Editor Shonmandiser<br />
Section; A. J. Stocker and lialpli Scliolbe.<br />
fVluli'mcnt Advertising. Telephone Columbus<br />
6-6370.<br />
Publication Offices: 825 Van Brunt Blvd.,<br />
Kansa.s City 1. Mo. Nathan Cohen, Executive<br />
Editor; Jesse Shlycn. Managing Editor;<br />
Morris Schlozmiin, Business Manager.<br />
Kenneth Iludnall. Edltpr The MODEliN<br />
TIIEATKE; Herbert Housh. Manager Advertising<br />
Sales. Telephone Cllestnut "777.<br />
Central Offices: Editorial— 624 S. Michigan<br />
Ave., Chicago 6, 111. Jon:is Perlberg.<br />
Telephone WEbster 9-4745. Advertising<br />
35 &ist Wacker Drive. Chicago 1, 111.<br />
E«lng Hutchison and E. E. Yeck. Telephone<br />
ANdover 3-3042.<br />
Western Offices: Editorial and Film Advertising—6404<br />
llollyuood Blvd., Hollywood<br />
28, Calif. Ivan Spear, manager. Telephone<br />
GLadstone 1186. Enulpment and<br />
Non-film Advertising—672 S. LaFayette<br />
I'ark riace, Los Angeles. Calif, Bob Wettiteln,<br />
manager. Telephone UUnklrk 8-22S6,<br />
Washington Offices: 6417 Duhloncga Road.<br />
Alan Herbert, manager. Phone Wisconsin<br />
3271. Sara Young, 932 New Jersey, N.W.<br />
London Offices: 26A, Redcliffe Mews, Kensington,<br />
S. W. John Sullivan, Manager.<br />
Publishers of: The MODERN THEATRE,<br />
published monthly as a section of BOX-<br />
OKKICE; BO.XOKFICE BAROMETER.<br />
Albany: 21-23 Walter Ave., M. Berrlgan.<br />
Birmingham: The News, Eddie Badger.<br />
Boston: Frances W. Harding, Lib. 2-9305.<br />
Charlotte: 216 W. 4th, Pauline Griffith.<br />
Cincinnati: 4020 Reading, Lillian Lazarus.<br />
Cleveland: Elsie Loeb, Fairmount 1-0046.<br />
Dallas: 4525 Holland. V, W. Crisp.<br />
Denver: 1645 Lifayette, Jack Hose.<br />
Des Moines: Relgster-Trlbune, Russ SchoA.<br />
Detroit: Fox Theatre BIdg., H. F. Rcves.<br />
Indianapolis: II. M. Rudeaiix.<br />
Memphis: 707 Spring St.. Null Adams.<br />
Milwaukee: 3057 No. Murray, John Iliibel.<br />
Mlmieapolls: 29 Washington, So., Les Recs,<br />
New Haven: 42 Oiiirch. Gertrude Lander.<br />
New Orleans: 218 S. Liberty, A. Schlndlcr.<br />
nkla. City: Terminal BIdg., Polly Trlndle<br />
Omaha: World-Herald BIdg., Lou Gerdcs.<br />
Philadelphia: 6363 Berks, Norman Shigon.<br />
Pittsburgh: 86 Van Braam, R. F. Kllngensmltli,<br />
ATlantic 2002.<br />
Portland, Ore.: Edward Cogan, Nortonia<br />
Hotel. Advertising: .Mel Hickman, 907<br />
Tcimlnal Sales BIdg., ATwaler 4107.<br />
St. Louis: 5149 Rosa, David Barrett.<br />
Salt Uke City: Deserct News, H. Pearson.<br />
San Francisco: Gall Llpman, 25 Taylor St..<br />
Ordway 3-4812, Advertising: Jerry No-<br />
«ell, Howard BIdg, 209 Post St.,<br />
YLkon 6-2522.<br />
Seattle: 928 N. 84th 8t , WUlard Elsey<br />
In Canada<br />
Calgary: The Albertan, Wm. Campbell.<br />
Monlreal: 4330 Wilson, Roy Carmlchael.<br />
St John: 116 Prlm-e Edward, W. SIc.Nulty.<br />
Toronto: R. II. 1. York Mills. M. Oalbralth.<br />
Vano.iuter: Lyric Theatre BIdg.. Jack Dny.<br />
Victoria: 938 Island Hwy, Alec Merrlman.<br />
Winnipeg: The Tribune. Ben Lepkln.<br />
Member Audit Bureau of Circulations<br />
Bitered as Second Class matter at Post<br />
Office. Kansa.s City. Mo Sicllonal Edition,<br />
13.00 per year; National Edition, $7.50.<br />
AUGUST 19, 1950<br />
Vol. 57 No. 16<br />
o.<br />
READY FOR BUSINESS<br />
HE Council of Motion Picture Organizations<br />
is ready for "business." An executive vicepresitient,<br />
who will be operations director, has<br />
been chosen; a financing plan has been fully<br />
agreed upon, with arrangements made for immediate<br />
provision of part of the funds; and other<br />
foundation "stones" have been set into place.<br />
It has taken a year to finalize the completion<br />
of a unified organization of all of the various<br />
segments of the industry. While we were among<br />
those who expressed concern over the delay, it<br />
may be well that things happened as they did.<br />
Certainly, it is well that differences over policy<br />
were threshed out beforehand, rather than to<br />
have them come up to endanger the organization<br />
after it had gotten started. While that possibility<br />
always will exist, the spirit of give-andtake<br />
displayed in the proceedings of last week's<br />
meetings is a healthy sign.<br />
Choice of Arthur Mayer as<br />
operational head<br />
of COMPO is a good one. His experience in<br />
exhibition and in other branches of the industry,<br />
together with his active participation in various<br />
phases of war activity during World War II and<br />
in postwar services make iiim ideally suited to<br />
the important task for which he has been chosen.<br />
With an ability to speak and possessing a genial<br />
personality and an unusual sense of logic, Arthur<br />
iVlayer should be effective in convincing all who<br />
need to be convinced of their responsibility, both<br />
in effort and money, to the common cause which<br />
COMPO is dedicated to serve.<br />
The concord reached on the industry's cooperation<br />
with the government in<br />
the war effort<br />
assures exhibitors of freedom of their screens.<br />
The new setup precludes the flooding of theatre<br />
screens with tilms produced by government agencies<br />
and private organizations as was the case<br />
during tlie last war. The special committee that<br />
will serve as liaison with the government will<br />
have to approve such films, but it will not have<br />
autliority to pledge motion picture screens or<br />
production or distribution facilities without<br />
unanimous vote.<br />
COMPO is ready to do business—with all the<br />
makings for an outstanding success. It has a<br />
capable executive in charge, a competent board<br />
of directors and, further, has at its disposal the<br />
brainpower and energy of the top and all other<br />
executives of this industry — plus an "army" of<br />
238,000 employes in its ranks. \^ ith each of<br />
these doing what he can to help, COMPO will<br />
accomplish its important task, in a minimum of<br />
time and with a minimum of difficulty,<br />
a maximum of benefit to<br />
all.<br />
but with<br />
See and Discover<br />
From time to time we have noted reports from<br />
exhibitors to the effect that, if they had seen a<br />
certain picture at its tradeshowing, they would<br />
have done a better job of selling it to their public.<br />
This very often applies to so-called "problem"<br />
pictures which, because of theme, are considered<br />
by distributors to be hard to sell. As a<br />
consequence, the distributors solt-pedal their own<br />
selling efforts, which apathy has an adverse influence<br />
on exhibitors.<br />
Ken Christiansen of the Roxy Theatre, Washburn,<br />
i\. U., who plays pictures late, is author of<br />
the following report:<br />
"The Secret GartJen—I believe, if I had seen this<br />
at the tradeshowing, I could have sold it here.<br />
It gave us average midweek business and we received<br />
a lot of good comments. It is a much better<br />
picture than we had been led to believe."<br />
The purpose of tradescreenings was to<br />
afford<br />
exhibitors the privilege of seeing pictures before<br />
they bought them. Secondarily, they provide<br />
an opportunity for doing a better job ot booking<br />
and merchandising. Exiiibitors are at fault when<br />
they do not take advantage of these opportunities.<br />
As we have said before, when tliey are<br />
unable to attend screenings, they have a second<br />
or later chance to see pictures at tlieir openings<br />
in their exchange center or in key spots in their<br />
vicinity.<br />
Whenever an exhibitor says he could have done<br />
better. If" . . ., it is evident that a picture has lost<br />
patronage that it should-^and could—have had.<br />
iviultiply that by only a part of the several thousand<br />
bookings each picture normally gets and<br />
it could add up to that subrtantial loss of patronage<br />
about which the industry is so greatly<br />
concerned.<br />
There has been talk of belter informing the<br />
public on the contents of pictures. But the job<br />
is only half done when exiiibitors are left out of<br />
such consideration. There seems to be plenty of<br />
giving and seeking of knowledge on the bigger<br />
pictures, but it is the oversight on the smaller<br />
pictures on which the losses are sustained. Every<br />
picture can't be a winner, but many of these<br />
overlooked little pictures hold possibilities for<br />
successful exhibition, the chances for which are<br />
lost when they are undersold—or<br />
0.^<br />
not sold at all.