31.08.2014 Views

UK Climate Change Programme 2006 - JNCC - Defra

UK Climate Change Programme 2006 - JNCC - Defra

UK Climate Change Programme 2006 - JNCC - Defra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

88<br />

Domestic<br />

England 19 will be met and announced extra<br />

funding of £140m between 2005-08 to tackle<br />

fuel poverty. This has since been boosted by the<br />

announcement in the 2005 Pre-Budget Report of<br />

an additional £300m over the same period to<br />

tackle fuel poverty across the <strong>UK</strong>. £250m of this<br />

funding will help tackle fuel poverty in England,<br />

taking total fuel poverty funding over the 2005-08<br />

period to over £800m. Carbon dioxide savings<br />

from Warm Front and other fuel poverty<br />

programmes are expected to be 0.4 MtC by 2010.<br />

57. The document also set out a number of changes<br />

to the Warm Front Scheme, the Government’s<br />

key tool for tackling fuel poverty in the private<br />

sector in England, which seeks to target<br />

vulnerable households to provide a range of<br />

heating and insulation measures that can be<br />

tailored to suit each individual property. These<br />

changes have now been implemented. Warm<br />

Front now offers central heating to all eligible<br />

households and gives them the option to receive<br />

the full range of appropriate measures over a<br />

period of time, subject to the maximum amount<br />

of grant that can be paid. Since the launch of the<br />

Scheme in June 2000, over one million<br />

households have been assisted.<br />

58. A range of challenges lie ahead in tackling fuel<br />

poverty. The Energy Review will consider whether<br />

there are any further steps that the Government,<br />

working with a wide cross-section of key<br />

stakeholders, can take to ensure we meet our <strong>UK</strong><br />

goal of eradicating fuel poverty by 2016-18.<br />

Decent Homes Standard<br />

59. Since 2001 there has been a 31 per cent<br />

reduction in the number of social sector homes<br />

failing the Decent Home standard on the thermal<br />

comfort criterion (from 1.3 to 0.9 million homes),<br />

which is a key criterion of the standard. Also<br />

since 2001, over 470,000 dwellings have received<br />

work to improve their energy efficiency under the<br />

decent homes programme or as part of wider<br />

local authority work to update the stock. This<br />

work is continuing. Local authorities typically<br />

work very closely with EEC suppliers when<br />

tackling their housing stock, so most of the<br />

carbon savings from the Decent Homes<br />

programme are attributed to EEC, and to a lesser<br />

extent to Building Regulations. But some<br />

additional activity does take place that is not<br />

accounted for elsewhere, and savings from this<br />

are conservatively estimated at 0.02 MtC per year.<br />

60. The average SAP rating 20 of the social sector<br />

stock rose to 58 by 2004 from 48 in 1996 and is<br />

likely to rise further over the coming years. The<br />

Decent Homes standard is a ‘trigger point’ for<br />

action to improve energy efficiency. As social<br />

landlords undertake works beyond the standard,<br />

energy efficiency improvements are continuing, in<br />

turn reducing carbon emissions.<br />

Community Energy<br />

61. In January 2002, the Government launched<br />

Community Energy, a £50m <strong>UK</strong>-wide capital<br />

programme for installing and refurbishing<br />

community heating. Schemes are mainly based<br />

on CHP with innovative approaches also<br />

encouraged. The funding was provided by<br />

Treasury’s Capital Modernisation Fund.<br />

62. In December 2004, <strong>Defra</strong> announced an extra<br />

£10m to extend the programme. The decision to<br />

do this was based on initial strong demand and a<br />

number of larger schemes with significant<br />

outputs. However, experience has shown that<br />

many larger schemes under the initial programme<br />

could not complete within the 31 March 2007<br />

spend deadline and did not go ahead. The<br />

smaller schemes that can complete tend to be<br />

expensive in relation to their outputs. The<br />

following table summarises how the programme<br />

has delivered against its targets and shows that<br />

the programme has fallen well short of delivering<br />

its objectives on all fronts.<br />

63. The high drop out rate for larger schemes is the<br />

main reason for the limited estimate of spend.<br />

The situation would not improve appreciably if<br />

we extended the spend deadline, as these larger<br />

schemes cannot complete within a timescale<br />

19 “To eradicate fuel poverty in vulnerable households in line with the Government’s fuel poverty strategic objective”.<br />

20 SAP (2001) rating is on a scale from 1 to 120. This will be replaced on the 6 April <strong>2006</strong> with the SAP (2005) rating scale which comes into effect with the<br />

Building Regulations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!