Stanturf, J.A. <strong>and</strong> S.H. Schoenholtz. 1998. Soils <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>form. P. 123-147. In M.G. Messina <strong>and</strong> W.H. Conner (eds.) Southern Forested Wetl<strong>and</strong>s: Ecology <strong>and</strong> Management. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. Stalnaker, C., B.L. Lamb, J. Henriksen, K. Bovee, <strong>and</strong> J. Bartholow. 1995. The Instream Flow Incremental Methodology: a primer for IFIM. Biological Report 29. U.S. Department of the Interior. National Biological Service. Washington, D.C. 46 pp. Stuber, R.J., G. Gebhardt, <strong>and</strong> O.E. Maughan. 1982. Habitat suitability index models: Largemouth bass. U.S. Fish <strong>and</strong> Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-82/10.16. Sutton, R.T. <strong>and</strong> D.L.R. Hodson. 2005. Atlantic Ocean forcing of North American <strong>and</strong> European summer climate. Science 309: 115-118. Tate, R.L. III. 1980. Microbial oxidation of organic matter in Histosols. Advances in Microbial Ecology 4: 169-201. Tharme, R.E. <strong>and</strong> J.M. King. 1998. Development of the building block methodology for instream flow assessments <strong>and</strong> supporting research on the effects of different magnitude flows on riverine ecosystems. Cape Town, South Africa <strong>Water</strong> Research Commission. Thorp, J.H., E.M. McEwan, M.F. Flynn, <strong>and</strong> F.R. Hauer. 1990. Invertebrate colonization of submerged wood in a cypress-tupelo swamp <strong>and</strong> blackwater stream. American Midl<strong>and</strong> Naturalist 113: 56-68. Trommer, J.T., M.J. DelCharco, <strong>and</strong> B.R. Lewelling. 1999. <strong>Water</strong> budget <strong>and</strong> water quality of Ward Lake, flow <strong>and</strong> water-quality characteristics of the Braden River estuary, <strong>and</strong> the effects of Ward Lake on the hydrologic system, West- Central <strong>Florida</strong>. U.S. Geological Survey, <strong>Water</strong>-Resources Investigations Report 98-425. Tallahassee, <strong>Florida</strong>. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2001. HEC-RAS river analysis system user's manual. US Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, CA. Vannote, R.L., G.W. Minshall, K.W. Cummins, J.R. Sedell, <strong>and</strong> C.E. Cushing. 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Aquatic Sciences 37: 130-137. Walbridge, M.R. <strong>and</strong> B.G. Lockaby. 1994. Effect of forest management of biogeochemical functions in southern forested wetl<strong>and</strong>s. Wetl<strong>and</strong>s 11: 417-439. Wallace, J.B. <strong>and</strong> A.C. Benke. 1984. Quantification of wood habitat in subtropical Coastal Plain streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Aquatic Sciences 41: 1643-1652. 6-7
Wharton, C.H., W.M. Kitchens, E.C. Pendleton, <strong>and</strong> T.W. Sipe. 1982. The ecology of bottoml<strong>and</strong> hardwood swamps of the southeast: a community profile. U.S. Fish <strong>and</strong> Wildlife Service FWX/OBS-81/37. 133 pp. Zuboy, J.R. 1981. A new tool for fisheries managers: the Delphi technique. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 1: 55-59. 6-8
- Page 1 and 2:
Proposed Minimum Flows and Levels f
- Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Page 5 and 6:
5.5 PRESCRIBED FLOW REDUCTION FOR B
- Page 7 and 8:
Figure 2-19. Potassium concentratio
- Page 9 and 10:
Figure 5-13. Median daily flow at t
- Page 11 and 12:
mean feature elevations are listed
- Page 13 and 14:
For the high flow season of the yea
- Page 15 and 16:
Acknowledgements The authors would
- Page 17 and 18:
fluctuations in water flows or leve
- Page 19 and 20:
Common to this list and the flow re
- Page 21 and 22:
Fundamental to the approach used fo
- Page 23 and 24:
300 250 Block 1 Block 3 Block 2 Flo
- Page 25 and 26:
are outlined in Chapter 4. In Chapt
- Page 27 and 28:
as the freshwater segment upstream
- Page 29 and 30:
attributed to analytic precision di
- Page 31 and 32:
Figure 2-4. 1999 land use/cover map
- Page 33 and 34:
Table 2-2. Land use/cover and land
- Page 35 and 36:
Figure 2-8. 1999 Land use/cover map
- Page 37 and 38:
Figure 2-10. 1972 Land use/cover ma
- Page 39 and 40:
Smith and Stopp (1978) note that "i
- Page 41 and 42:
2.4.2.1 Multidecadal Periods of Hig
- Page 43 and 44:
2.4.3.2 Step Trend in River Flows K
- Page 45 and 46:
Table 2-4. Results of Kendall's tau
- Page 47 and 48:
2.4.4 Benchmark Periods Climate-bas
- Page 49 and 50:
Oscillation were examined. On a sea
- Page 51 and 52:
Water Chemistry 2.4.6 Water Quality
- Page 53 and 54:
Braden River near Lorraine, FL 0.6
- Page 55 and 56:
Peace River at Arcadia, FL 10 Potas
- Page 57 and 58:
Table 2-8. Summary statistics for B
- Page 59 and 60:
3.2 Resources and Area of Concern T
- Page 61 and 62:
habitat, the greater area of stream
- Page 63 and 64:
levels such as fish have been shown
- Page 65 and 66:
Figure 3-1. Example of low flow in
- Page 67 and 68:
USGS Braden River near Lorraine gag
- Page 69 and 70: instream cross-sections were sample
- Page 71 and 72: Figure 4-2. Upstream vegetation cro
- Page 73 and 74: supports water surface profile calc
- Page 75 and 76: The HEC-RAS model was run using 21
- Page 77 and 78: Adult Spotted Sunfish Adults - Brad
- Page 79 and 80: species of interest. For example cu
- Page 81 and 82: 4.4 Seasonal Flow and Development o
- Page 83 and 84: Wetted Perimeter - Sta. 44.9 25 20
- Page 85 and 86: factors, the most conservative of w
- Page 87 and 88: Chapter 5 Results and Recommended M
- Page 89 and 90: Wetted Perimeter Requirements Flow
- Page 91 and 92: 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 May June M
- Page 93 and 94: Floodplain profiles and vegetation
- Page 95 and 96: mean elevation of the Oak/popash ve
- Page 97 and 98: Table 5-3. Mean (±SD) flows at the
- Page 99 and 100: Elevaton (NGVD) 27.0 22.0 17.0 12.0
- Page 101 and 102: Table 5-7. Median elevations, in fe
- Page 103 and 104: 80 70 60 Flow reduction (%) 50 40 3
- Page 105 and 106: Table 5-8. Recommended percent flow
- Page 107 and 108: 100 90 80 % DOMINANCE 70 60 50 40 3
- Page 109 and 110: Table 5-9. Mean elevation of instre
- Page 111 and 112: The second standard was developed t
- Page 113 and 114: Table 5-10. Proposed Minimum Flows
- Page 115 and 116: Division Information and Technology
- Page 117 and 118: Hupalo, R., C. Neubauer, L. Keenan,
- Page 119: communities in the corridors of the
- Page 123 and 124: Confined Aquifer - A term used to d
- Page 125 and 126: Instream Habitats - A specific type
- Page 127 and 128: Riffle - A relatively shallow reach
- Page 129 and 130: Chapter 8 Appendix A A Review of
- Page 131 and 132: steps to reduce the uncertainty and
- Page 133 and 134: 2007). In addition, the approach us
- Page 135 and 136: with limited biological knowledge o
- Page 137 and 138: the other factors listed above or w
- Page 139 and 140: have now been developed and adopted
- Page 141 and 142: An example of the primary output fr
- Page 143 and 144: prevent negative effects associated
- Page 145 and 146: methods, such as LiDAR, to improve
- Page 147 and 148: habitat reduction criterion and the
- Page 149 and 150: Summary, Special Publication SJ2002
- Page 151 and 152: Errata / comments by page number in
- Page 153 and 154: 4-20 Section 4.7.1, 1 st paragraph,
- Page 155 and 156: Chapter 9 Appendix B - Staff Respon
- Page 157 and 158: 2) The panel notes that the period
- Page 159 and 160: 4) One aspect of Chapter 2 should b
- Page 161 and 162: Preventing Significant Harm - 15% C
- Page 163 and 164: they aren't getting enough particul
- Page 165 and 166: Habitat Criteria and Characterizati
- Page 167 and 168: Compliance Standards and Proposed M
- Page 169 and 170: Glossary of Terms 13) When an inter