Chapter 1 Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
Chapter 1 Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
Chapter 1 Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Errata / Comments by Page umber in the May 18, 2007 Upper<br />
Braden River MFL peer review draft report<br />
All errata listed in the peer review report were addressed in the revised<br />
version of the report with the exception of the following.<br />
2-22 1 st paragraph, line 7 – shouldn’t the benchmark period be “1970<br />
through 1999” rather than “1970 through 1994” – see Figure 2-14, Table 2-4,<br />
Table 2-5, last line of page?<br />
No, though in earlier MFLs reports the AMO cycle was taken to be 30 year<br />
periods recent climatologically papers <strong>and</strong> communication with NOAA staff has<br />
lead us to refine the most recent dry phase to reflect a shift back to the wet<br />
phase as of 1995.<br />
2-32 Table 2-8 - Is the minimum pH for the Peace at Arcadia really 0.7?<br />
Staff agree that this reported values seems low. Though our original files<br />
indicated three dates (11/12/63, 8/1/64, <strong>and</strong> 9/1/65) as having a pH of 0.73 when<br />
we went back to the USGS website on 11/27/2007 we found these numbers<br />
currently reported as 7.3 <strong>and</strong> the current minimum reported as 3.8 on 3/1/1963<br />
<strong>and</strong> have modified the revised report accordingly.<br />
4-20 Section 4.7.1, 1 st paragraph, line 4 – shouldn’t “1988-1993 <strong>and</strong> from<br />
1994-2005”read “1988-1994 <strong>and</strong> from 1995-2005”?<br />
No. It would have been correct to go from “1988-1994 <strong>and</strong> from 1995-2005” but<br />
the actual model runs from the consultant were from “1988-1993 <strong>and</strong> from 1994-<br />
2005”. This occurred because staff had not made a determination on when the<br />
AMO shifted phases until after the PHABSIM data was delivered to the<br />
consultant.<br />
4-22 Section 4.8.1, line 8 – shouldn’t “1989 through 1993 <strong>and</strong> from 1994<br />
through 2005” read “1988 through 1994 <strong>and</strong> from 1995 through 2005”?<br />
No. It would have been correct to go from “1988-1994 <strong>and</strong> from 1995-2005” but<br />
the actual model runs from the consultant were from “1988-1993 <strong>and</strong> from 1994-<br />
2005”. This occurred because staff had not made a determination on when the<br />
AMO shifted phases until after the PHABSIM data was delivered to the<br />
consultant.<br />
9-16