January 16, 2013 - Texas Workforce Commission
January 16, 2013 - Texas Workforce Commission
January 16, 2013 - Texas Workforce Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
81<br />
1 advice for any individual.<br />
2 The subject of discrimination because of<br />
3 sex, which by the courts has been extended to mean<br />
4 discrimination because of sex or gender, has in the<br />
5 past been and I expect will continue to be one that<br />
6 evokes strong emotions from many individuals. In<br />
7 April of 2012 the commission of the -- the commission<br />
8 members of the Equal Employment Opportunity <strong>Commission</strong><br />
9 decided the case of Mia Macy versus Eric Holder, and<br />
10 I've given you a copy of the opinion in that case.<br />
11 A brief overview of the facts of the<br />
12 case. Mia Macy was an applicant for employment with<br />
13 the Department of Justice Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,<br />
14 Firearms, and Explosives. During the application<br />
15 process, she proceeded to the point of a background<br />
<strong>16</strong> check. At which time she contacted the employer to<br />
17 notify them that she was in the process of<br />
18 transitioning from being a man to being a woman.<br />
19 The application process ceased at that<br />
20 time. I believe she was told that the -- the vacancy<br />
21 had been canceled. In fact, another individual was<br />
22 selected for the position, and Ms. Macy filed a<br />
23 federal sector discrimination complaint. I believe<br />
24 that the process in the federal government is that<br />
25 those complaints are processed by the agency and can