11.10.2014 Views

January 16, 2013 - Texas Workforce Commission

January 16, 2013 - Texas Workforce Commission

January 16, 2013 - Texas Workforce Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

85<br />

1 EEOC applied in this opinion. The stereotype is that<br />

2 an individual, be it a man or a woman, should not<br />

3 expect to change to the opposite sex through the<br />

4 transgender procedure. And by applying that<br />

5 stereotype and then acting on that stereotype in an<br />

6 employment action in this case against an applicant<br />

7 for employment constitutes discrimination because of<br />

8 sex.<br />

9 I did want to point out what I thought<br />

10 was a very interesting part of the rationale in the<br />

11 EEOC opinion, and this is at the top of Page 12,<br />

12 "Gender is no different from religion. Assume that an<br />

13 employee considers herself Christian and identifies as<br />

14 such but assume that an employer finds out the<br />

15 employee's parents are Muslim believes that the<br />

<strong>16</strong> employee should therefore be Muslim and terminates the<br />

17 employee on that basis. No one would doubt that such<br />

18 an employer discriminated on the basis of religion.<br />

19 There would be no need for the employee who<br />

20 experienced the adverse employment action to<br />

21 demonstrate that the employer acted on the basis of<br />

22 some religious stereotype. Although clearly<br />

23 discomfort with the choice made by the employee with<br />

24 regard to religion would presumably be at the route of<br />

25 employer's actions, but for purposes of establishing a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!