January 16, 2013 - Texas Workforce Commission
January 16, 2013 - Texas Workforce Commission
January 16, 2013 - Texas Workforce Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
85<br />
1 EEOC applied in this opinion. The stereotype is that<br />
2 an individual, be it a man or a woman, should not<br />
3 expect to change to the opposite sex through the<br />
4 transgender procedure. And by applying that<br />
5 stereotype and then acting on that stereotype in an<br />
6 employment action in this case against an applicant<br />
7 for employment constitutes discrimination because of<br />
8 sex.<br />
9 I did want to point out what I thought<br />
10 was a very interesting part of the rationale in the<br />
11 EEOC opinion, and this is at the top of Page 12,<br />
12 "Gender is no different from religion. Assume that an<br />
13 employee considers herself Christian and identifies as<br />
14 such but assume that an employer finds out the<br />
15 employee's parents are Muslim believes that the<br />
<strong>16</strong> employee should therefore be Muslim and terminates the<br />
17 employee on that basis. No one would doubt that such<br />
18 an employer discriminated on the basis of religion.<br />
19 There would be no need for the employee who<br />
20 experienced the adverse employment action to<br />
21 demonstrate that the employer acted on the basis of<br />
22 some religious stereotype. Although clearly<br />
23 discomfort with the choice made by the employee with<br />
24 regard to religion would presumably be at the route of<br />
25 employer's actions, but for purposes of establishing a