28.10.2014 Views

Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9 (EISS 9 ... - CSSP - CNRS

Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9 (EISS 9 ... - CSSP - CNRS

Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9 (EISS 9 ... - CSSP - CNRS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

S<strong>in</strong>ce Me<strong>in</strong>unger (2009) does not consider external-EI constructions that conta<strong>in</strong> adjectives, a<br />

degree analysis is not evident for him, <strong>and</strong> hence, he analyzes them as adjectives. As said above,<br />

this makes wrong predictions if there is an adjective (the more common case). Recall that the<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> motivation to analyze EIs as the head of DegP was that it directly accounts for the fact that<br />

no other degree expressions can co-occur with the adjective when an EI is present.<br />

(26) Du hast sau die *{sehr coole / total coole / cool-ere / cool-ste} Party verpasst.<br />

you has EI the very cool EI cool cool-COMP cool-SUP party missed<br />

This restriction cannot be accounted for by Me<strong>in</strong>unger’s (2009) adjective analysis, <strong>and</strong> we therefore<br />

conclude that it should be substituted by a degree analysis, like we suggested above.<br />

The presence of a gradable adjective or, at least, a gradable noun is, however, not sufficient to<br />

license external EIs. It depends also on the syntactic form of the DP, especially on the determ<strong>in</strong>er.<br />

While sau can occupy an external position if the DP is headed by a def<strong>in</strong>ite article like <strong>in</strong><br />

example (20) above, this is not possible if the DP is a projection of an <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite article, as the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g example shows.<br />

(27) *Du hast gestern sau e<strong>in</strong>e coole Party verpasst.<br />

you has yesterday EI a cool party missed<br />

Contrast<strong>in</strong>g this restriction with the def<strong>in</strong>iteness effect, which can be observed <strong>in</strong> existential<br />

constructions (Milsark 1977) or possessive constructions with have (Bach 1967), the EIs <strong>in</strong> external<br />

position could be said to be connected with an <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>iteness effect (Wang <strong>and</strong> McCready<br />

2007). However, the syntax of EIs <strong>in</strong> this position is even more restricted, s<strong>in</strong>ce it does not allow<br />

for other def<strong>in</strong>ite determ<strong>in</strong>ers. For <strong>in</strong>stance, demonstrative pronouns, which are def<strong>in</strong>ite, are also<br />

impossible with external EIs. The same holds for possessive pronouns.<br />

(28) *Heute<br />

today<br />

steigt sau diese/ihre coole Party.<br />

goes-on EI that/her cool party<br />

Furthermore, EIs cannot occur <strong>in</strong> the external position of quantified DPs irrespective of the<br />

question of whether the quantifier is strong or weak.<br />

(29) *Heute steigen {sau alle / e<strong>in</strong>ige / die meisten / drei / höchstens drei} coole(n) Partys.<br />

Heute goes-on EI all some the most three at most three cool parties<br />

All these examples illustrate that the syntactic structures that license EIs <strong>in</strong> DP-external position<br />

are very specific <strong>and</strong> highly restricted. Furthermore, only EIs are allowed <strong>in</strong> this position, while<br />

ord<strong>in</strong>ary degree words like sehr ‘very’ are not, as it has been shown <strong>in</strong> (20). This contrasts with<br />

the DP-<strong>in</strong>ternal position, <strong>in</strong> which EIs are much less restricted <strong>and</strong> exhibit the same behavior as<br />

non-expressive <strong>in</strong>tensifiers.<br />

3.2. The semantics of external EIs<br />

Beside the syntactic constra<strong>in</strong>ts that come with the external position, there is also a curious<br />

semantic effect. Even if external sau is restricted to occur only with a def<strong>in</strong>ite determ<strong>in</strong>er, the<br />

DP is nevertheless <strong>in</strong>terpreted as <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite. The DP-external construction <strong>in</strong> (30a) therefore<br />

corresponds to the <strong>in</strong>ternal variant <strong>in</strong> (30b) <strong>and</strong> not as expected to (30c).<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!