28.10.2014 Views

Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9 (EISS 9 ... - CSSP - CNRS

Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9 (EISS 9 ... - CSSP - CNRS

Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9 (EISS 9 ... - CSSP - CNRS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>in</strong>g the CNJ-LST proposed for coord<strong>in</strong>ation structures. Coord<strong>in</strong>ation of wh-fillers is reserved to<br />

constituents bear<strong>in</strong>g a WH feature, which prevent non-<strong>in</strong>terrogative fillers from be<strong>in</strong>g conjo<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

(58)<br />

⎡ ⎤<br />

head-coord-filler-ph<br />

⎡<br />

〈 ⎡ ⎢SLASH S ⎥<br />

⎣ { } ⎦ −→ ⎢<br />

⎣CNJ-LST ⎣ LOC ⎤ ⎡<br />

{<br />

1 } ⎦, ..., ⎣ LOC ⎤〉 ⎤ ⎡<br />

{<br />

2 } ⎦ ⎥ ⎢<br />

SLASH S ∪<br />

⎦, H ⎣<br />

WH 3 WH 4<br />

STORE 0 ∪ 3 , 4<br />

STORE 0 ∪<br />

{<br />

1 , 2<br />

{<br />

3 , 4<br />

In figure 1, we provide the syntactic tree for the Hungarian coord<strong>in</strong>ate wh-structure Ki és<br />

mit látott? (‘Who saw someth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> what was it?’).<br />

} ⎤<br />

}<br />

⎥<br />

⎦<br />

Figure 1: Syntactic tree for Hungarian coord<strong>in</strong>ate wh-questions<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!