Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9 (EISS 9 ... - CSSP - CNRS
Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9 (EISS 9 ... - CSSP - CNRS
Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9 (EISS 9 ... - CSSP - CNRS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
(36) a. *Ich treffe heute sau den coolen Peter.<br />
I meet today EI the cool Peter<br />
b. Ich treffe heute den sau coolen Peter.<br />
I meet today the EI cool Peter<br />
Note that (36a) is only unacceptable when Peter is used as a real proper name. In cases <strong>in</strong> which<br />
a proper name is used to denote a property <strong>in</strong>stead of an <strong>in</strong>dividual, external EIs are possible.<br />
For <strong>in</strong>stance, (37) is f<strong>in</strong>e when used to express that some property that is saliently associated<br />
with E<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong> holds to a high degree for Peter.<br />
(37) Peter ist sau der E<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong>.<br />
Peter is EI the E<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong><br />
‘Peter is totally an E<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong>’<br />
The f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of our brief discussion of the syntax <strong>and</strong> semantics of EIs is summarized <strong>in</strong><br />
Table 1. Internal EIs do not show a special relationship between their syntactic structure <strong>and</strong><br />
their semantic <strong>in</strong>terpretation. In the construction, the choice of the determ<strong>in</strong>er is not restricted at<br />
all <strong>and</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terpretation of the entire DP compositionally reflects which determ<strong>in</strong>er is used. In<br />
contrast, when it comes to EIs <strong>in</strong> the external position, we can detect a mismatch between their<br />
form <strong>and</strong> their <strong>in</strong>terpretation. Indef<strong>in</strong>ite articles (as well as many other k<strong>in</strong>ds of determ<strong>in</strong>ers) are<br />
impossible if the EI is located externally, but despite the presence of a def<strong>in</strong>ite article, the entire<br />
DP receives an <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite <strong>in</strong>terpretation. In the next section, we turn to this puzzle, raise some<br />
additional ones, <strong>and</strong> sketch an analysis of external EIs.<br />
syntax ←match→ semantics<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternal <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite ✓ <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite<br />
def<strong>in</strong>ite ✓ def<strong>in</strong>ite<br />
external *<strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite (✓) *<strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite<br />
def<strong>in</strong>ite ✗ <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite<br />
Table 1: <strong>Syntax</strong>-semantics (mis)matches with EIs<br />
4. A sketch of an analysis<br />
As the previous discussion has shown, EIs show <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> rather unexpected behavior<br />
that raises many questions for an analysis of their syntax <strong>and</strong> semantics. We take the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
four questions to be the most important ones from the perspective of the syntax-semantics<br />
<strong>in</strong>terface.<br />
(i) Position Given that degree elements commonly do not occur outside of the DP, what<br />
is the position <strong>in</strong> which external EIs reside?<br />
(ii) Restriction to EIs Given that, except for their expressive mean<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>ternal EIs seem<br />
to behave like st<strong>and</strong>ard degree words, why is the external position only available for the<br />
former but not for the latter?<br />
(iii) Restriction to def<strong>in</strong>ite articles Why is the external position only available for def<strong>in</strong>ite<br />
articles but neither for <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite ones nor for quantified DPs?<br />
(iv) Indef<strong>in</strong>ite <strong>in</strong>terpretation Why is the entire DP <strong>in</strong>terpreted <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>itely, despite the fact<br />
that a def<strong>in</strong>ite article is required for the external position to be available <strong>in</strong> the first place?<br />
157