28.10.2014 Views

Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9 (EISS 9 ... - CSSP - CNRS

Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9 (EISS 9 ... - CSSP - CNRS

Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9 (EISS 9 ... - CSSP - CNRS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(36) a. *Ich treffe heute sau den coolen Peter.<br />

I meet today EI the cool Peter<br />

b. Ich treffe heute den sau coolen Peter.<br />

I meet today the EI cool Peter<br />

Note that (36a) is only unacceptable when Peter is used as a real proper name. In cases <strong>in</strong> which<br />

a proper name is used to denote a property <strong>in</strong>stead of an <strong>in</strong>dividual, external EIs are possible.<br />

For <strong>in</strong>stance, (37) is f<strong>in</strong>e when used to express that some property that is saliently associated<br />

with E<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong> holds to a high degree for Peter.<br />

(37) Peter ist sau der E<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Peter is EI the E<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong><br />

‘Peter is totally an E<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong>’<br />

The f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of our brief discussion of the syntax <strong>and</strong> semantics of EIs is summarized <strong>in</strong><br />

Table 1. Internal EIs do not show a special relationship between their syntactic structure <strong>and</strong><br />

their semantic <strong>in</strong>terpretation. In the construction, the choice of the determ<strong>in</strong>er is not restricted at<br />

all <strong>and</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terpretation of the entire DP compositionally reflects which determ<strong>in</strong>er is used. In<br />

contrast, when it comes to EIs <strong>in</strong> the external position, we can detect a mismatch between their<br />

form <strong>and</strong> their <strong>in</strong>terpretation. Indef<strong>in</strong>ite articles (as well as many other k<strong>in</strong>ds of determ<strong>in</strong>ers) are<br />

impossible if the EI is located externally, but despite the presence of a def<strong>in</strong>ite article, the entire<br />

DP receives an <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite <strong>in</strong>terpretation. In the next section, we turn to this puzzle, raise some<br />

additional ones, <strong>and</strong> sketch an analysis of external EIs.<br />

syntax ←match→ semantics<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternal <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite ✓ <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ite ✓ def<strong>in</strong>ite<br />

external *<strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite (✓) *<strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ite ✗ <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite<br />

Table 1: <strong>Syntax</strong>-semantics (mis)matches with EIs<br />

4. A sketch of an analysis<br />

As the previous discussion has shown, EIs show <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> rather unexpected behavior<br />

that raises many questions for an analysis of their syntax <strong>and</strong> semantics. We take the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

four questions to be the most important ones from the perspective of the syntax-semantics<br />

<strong>in</strong>terface.<br />

(i) Position Given that degree elements commonly do not occur outside of the DP, what<br />

is the position <strong>in</strong> which external EIs reside?<br />

(ii) Restriction to EIs Given that, except for their expressive mean<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>ternal EIs seem<br />

to behave like st<strong>and</strong>ard degree words, why is the external position only available for the<br />

former but not for the latter?<br />

(iii) Restriction to def<strong>in</strong>ite articles Why is the external position only available for def<strong>in</strong>ite<br />

articles but neither for <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite ones nor for quantified DPs?<br />

(iv) Indef<strong>in</strong>ite <strong>in</strong>terpretation Why is the entire DP <strong>in</strong>terpreted <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>itely, despite the fact<br />

that a def<strong>in</strong>ite article is required for the external position to be available <strong>in</strong> the first place?<br />

157

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!