04.11.2014 Views

Islj 2009 3-4 - TMC Asser Instituut

Islj 2009 3-4 - TMC Asser Instituut

Islj 2009 3-4 - TMC Asser Instituut

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

competition (thereby enhancing the entertainment spectacle for consumers).<br />

Furthermore, attendance data collated by the RFL demonstrates<br />

that average weekly attendance at a Super League match<br />

increased annually between 2001 and 2008. 45 Since the number of foreign<br />

players participating in the competition also increased over the<br />

latter part of that period, it is arguable that the number of foreign<br />

players in a Super League first team squad does not negatively affect<br />

supporter interest. The positive benefits provided by foreign players to<br />

the competition, local players and consumers outweigh the introduction<br />

of a rule that discriminates, limits competition in the relevant<br />

market and ultimately reduces the quality of the sporting spectacle for<br />

consumers.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The “club trained rule” is anti-competitive, discriminatory and disproportionate<br />

to the aims it seeks to achieve; it infringes Article 81(1).<br />

Furthermore, it is unlikely the exemption contained in Article 81(3)<br />

applies. Whether the “club trained rule” improves production of playing<br />

services or promotes technical or economic progress is difficult to<br />

45 Rugby Football League, Super League<br />

Attendance Data 2000-2008 (as at 4<br />

September 2008).<br />

ascertain because of its simultaneous introduction with the licensing<br />

system; and the removal of the “rule of promotion and relegation”.<br />

The competition’s regulatory framework encourages the Super League<br />

clubs to develop junior players in ways that: are non-discriminatory;<br />

have a minimum effect in the market for playing services; and do not<br />

impede access to employment for some players. The “club trained<br />

rule” was thus unnecessary in light of other aspects of the regulatory<br />

framework.<br />

The RFL and the clubs can not protect the local labour market<br />

from competition with nationals from other Member States (a factor<br />

in common with other British employers). If a reduction in the number<br />

of foreign players is required, the RFL may use the consultation<br />

process undertaken annually with the United Kingdom Border<br />

Agency to strengthen the criteria for a professional rugby league player’s<br />

work permit. In that way the RFL may legitimately influence the<br />

number of foreign players entering the competition through employment<br />

at British clubs. Finally, the rule was introduced by the RFL and<br />

the clubs unilaterally following limited consultation with affected parties.<br />

A more robust application of European competition law is<br />

required in order to limit the exercise of private regulatory power that<br />

detrimentally affects the consumer interest and the employment<br />

interests of professional rugby league players.<br />

A Plea for Olympic Recognition<br />

for Curaçao<br />

by Roy Paul Bottse*<br />

❖<br />

Introduction<br />

One of the deepest sensations of the Olympic Games is seeing your<br />

national flag flying among all the other ones while marching into the<br />

Stadium on the opening day. Participants and team officials will<br />

always have difficulty to explain the emotional feelings of that<br />

moment. For all, it is the fulfillment of an incredible dream, topping<br />

rough and tough years of hard work and sacrifices.<br />

I am grateful to be among the lucky few to ever experience the<br />

Olympic Games as participants. My own experiences date back to<br />

more than three decades ago, 1 and up to date, they have been the<br />

rewarding compensation for all the hardship I went through. I will<br />

never forget seeing our flag flying proudly and intensely among all the<br />

many others. To me it was a moving confirmation of international<br />

recognition of our country.<br />

The Olympic Games are one of the best-known ongoing inheritances<br />

of mankind. Hence, all countries, small or big, have the historical<br />

right to be part of this wonderful tradition. As a former Olympic<br />

athlete I will always do whatever I can to promote, protect and support<br />

participation in this unmatched magical event.<br />

Now, many years later I have decided to pursue another dream:<br />

studying law. It has had my attention ever since, but somehow I never<br />

got to doing it, until 2005 when I had to take care of my sick wife and<br />

decided to quit my job. While she was mostly sleeping in the afternoon<br />

and the early evenings, I took on law school in order to do<br />

something useful and interesting.<br />

* Master Thesis, University of the<br />

Netherlands Antilles, Faculty of Law,<br />

July <strong>2009</strong>.<br />

1 http://www.sports-reference.com/<br />

olympics/summer/1976/ATH/<br />

mens-800-metres.html.<br />

2 http://referendum.cura.net.<br />

3 Antillas Holandesas, AHO, the formal<br />

Olympic abbreviation for the<br />

Netherlands Antilles as included in the<br />

IOC list.<br />

4 J. C. Barker, International law and international<br />

relations. p. 176.<br />

Combining the past and the present, I have elected my final thesis in<br />

relation to our sport identity within the constitutional reform our<br />

country is going through. My attention is primarily fixed on gathering<br />

relevant supporting arguments towards contesting a routinely confirmed<br />

impossibility of recognition for a National Olympic Committee<br />

(NOC) of an autonomous Curaçao by the NOC Relations Depart -<br />

ment of the International Olympic Committee (I.O.C).<br />

It all started with the historical event of the referendum held in<br />

Curaçao in April 2005, in which the majority of the population voted<br />

for the option of abandoning the Netherlands Antilles constellation<br />

and becoming an autonomous country within the Kingdom. 2<br />

Among other things, one would expect this alteration to include<br />

that local athletes will no longer compete internationally under the<br />

Netherlands Antilles (AHO) 3 flag, but in the future will showcase the<br />

colors and anthem of Curaçao. However, referring to the current<br />

Olym pic Charter the current Netherlands Antilles Olympic Commit -<br />

tee (NAOC), proclaimed that recognition of a Curaçao Olympic<br />

Committee of its own is not feasible.<br />

The case itself has not much to do with sports, but is an interesting<br />

riddle of constitutional, national, international private and public<br />

law as well as sports law. Note that in order to understand the presented<br />

problem and the advocated approach, one must not restrict him<br />

self to national law but frequently shift to the territories of international<br />

and international sport law, which both have their specific doctrines<br />

and customaries. One typical aspect international law is certainly<br />

that it is not static, but adapts to opinio juris, and also that interpretation<br />

is legal part of authoritative decisions. 4 Most probably this<br />

case is the first issue contesting the true value of the future autonomy<br />

of Curaçao as negotiated by the island political leadership.<br />

My Thesis is the following:<br />

Is, in the year <strong>2009</strong>, the verbatim text of Rule 31.1 of the Olympic Charter,<br />

A RT I C L E S<br />

<strong>2009</strong>/3-4 43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!