Islj 2009 3-4 - TMC Asser Instituut
Islj 2009 3-4 - TMC Asser Instituut
Islj 2009 3-4 - TMC Asser Instituut
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
authorities with something that was lacking before in the legal framework-a<br />
direct way to address the most notorious violators and leaders<br />
of the Dutch hooligan groups and to hopefully break the hierarchical<br />
structure of these groups.<br />
This law fits in nicely within the current legal framework to counteract<br />
football hooliganism in the Netherlands. In case of (a threat of)<br />
immediate violations of public order, the mayor can issue an emergency<br />
ordinance based on the Municipalities law. This is a fairly severe<br />
measure that impacts an individual’s constitutional rights and the<br />
mayor accordingly needs to be very cautious in using this instrument.<br />
However, an emergency ordinance is a measure that is an appropriate<br />
response to very serious and immediate threats to public order, for<br />
example a large scale riot between competing football fans within the<br />
boundaries of the municipality the mayor is responsible for. The powers<br />
given to the mayor in the proposed Football Law fill a void in the<br />
possibilities for a mayor to deal with football hooligans. In those situations<br />
where there is no immediate threat to public order that<br />
requires the extreme measure of an emergency ordinance, but where<br />
there is a structural pattern of public order violations by football<br />
hooligans, this proposal offers the mayor a way to act.<br />
In and around the stadium, the clubs and the KNVB are responsible<br />
for maintaining the order, together with the authorities. If someone<br />
does not behave within a stadium, that person can be expelled<br />
from the stadium by the stewards employed by the clubs, who as representatives<br />
of the club maintain order within the stadium. If someone’s<br />
behavior warrants this, the KNVB can also act against this person<br />
by giving the person concerned a civil law stadium ban.<br />
If a person commits a football related criminal act, this can ultimately<br />
warrant a criminal sanction. This person will then be punished for<br />
that act by a judge upon a complaint by the prosecutor. The judge in<br />
the case of a conviction for a football related crime can, on the basis<br />
of article14(c) of the Criminal Code, attach a measure such as a stadium<br />
ban, an area ban and/or a reporting duty to this conviction.<br />
However, this possibility has not or rarely been used by judges in the<br />
Netherlands. The powers given to the prosecutor under this law fill a<br />
gap in the current array of legal measures, in that they provide the<br />
possibility of handing out a measure to a person against whom there<br />
is a strong suspicion of a criminal act who is not convicted for that act<br />
yet. The proposed Football Law will also most likely change the attitude<br />
of judges with regard to article 14 (c) of the Criminal Code. If<br />
the prosecutor has already handed out a measure to a person, the<br />
judge, upon convicting someone for a football related crime will be<br />
more likely to take over such a measure. So while article 14 (c)<br />
Criminal Code is rarely used at this point, it is to be expected that<br />
after the football law enters into force, this article will be used more<br />
often to attach conditions to a conviction for a football related crime.<br />
In conclusion, the Football Law has been taken up in a broader<br />
proposed law to counteract various violations of public order. This<br />
does not mean that the Football Law does not help in combating<br />
football hooliganism. As shown above, the Football Law fills an<br />
important void in the powers of the mayor and prosecutor to deal<br />
with football hooliganism. Therefore, it is to be hoped that this law<br />
will enter into force as soon as possible.<br />
❖<br />
The Slovak Act on the Organization and<br />
Support of Sport; a Missed Opportunity?<br />
by Jozef CŠorba*<br />
1. Introduction<br />
The changes in the political and economic system in Slovakia that<br />
were initiated in 1989 influenced all areas of public life including<br />
sports. The transition from a directly controlled economy to an economy<br />
based on market mechanisms and free competition led to the<br />
introduction of market elements in the field of sport also. Nowadays,<br />
sport is perceived as a ‘product’ that is supplied to an audience - consumers.<br />
Hence, in order to be successful this product has to be of the<br />
best quality.<br />
To improve quality and sport results one needs high quality athletes.<br />
Athletes can only achieve better results if they are given sufficient<br />
time and space for preparation. The highest level of sport competition<br />
requires systematic long-term preparation, which can only be<br />
achieved if athletes can practice sport as their profession. It was<br />
already apparent under the previous political system that if Slovak<br />
athletes were to be successful and able to significantly compete with<br />
athletes from other countries they needed to engage in sport professionally.<br />
In the period before 1989, however, officially professional<br />
sport did not exist in Czechoslovakia. Athletes were officially<br />
employed in various state businesses or public bodies, where they supposedly<br />
performed various white or blue collar functions while practising<br />
their sport as amateurs. In reality, they performed their nonsport<br />
jobs only in name and dedicated all their time to sports activities<br />
and preparation for sports events on behalf of their employer.<br />
They were therefore in an actual sense professional athletes, although<br />
* This article was written as part of the<br />
project APVV number LPP-0199-09<br />
‘Inevitability and possibility of the application<br />
of business law provisions on professional<br />
sports activities’.<br />
** The author is a lecturer with the<br />
Department of Commercial and<br />
Economic Law of the Faculty of Law of<br />
the University of P. J. Šafárik in Košice<br />
in Slovakia.<br />
formally amateurs and subject to appraisal for their ‘official’ jobs<br />
which they were in fact not doing at all.<br />
This simulation of amateur status was eliminated from sport after<br />
1989 and since then the highest level of sport has been organized along<br />
the lines of the principles of professionalism. Many sport clubs transformed<br />
into corporate bodies based on principles of private law, especially<br />
as private law associations established on the basis of Act no.<br />
83/1990 on associations, and more recently, especially in top sport<br />
competitions, sport clubs have been established as companies under<br />
the Commercial Code that came into force in 1991.<br />
With these changes discussions also began concerning the options<br />
for the legal regulation of this new situation in sport. Act no. 68/1956<br />
on the organization of physical education, according to which the<br />
relationships in amateur sports organizations are regulated, was considered<br />
no longer suitable to the demands of this new era.<br />
2. The development of sport legislation in Slovakia after 1989<br />
The first decree related to the field of sport was adopted by the Slovak<br />
parliament at the time when the Czech-Slovak Federative Republic<br />
still existed as Act no. 198/1990 which contained 9 provisions. This<br />
Act was, however, more of declarative than of practical importance.<br />
On the first day of the year 1993 Czechoslovakia split into two<br />
autonomous states and the legislative developments in both states<br />
took their own turn, although of course the laws of both countries are<br />
still significantly inspired by each other.<br />
In Slovakia, Act no. 288/1997 on physical culture and on the<br />
amendment and completion of Act no. 455/1991 on trade law were<br />
adopted. However, this Act could not yet be considered as the fundamental<br />
Sports Act due to its restrictive wording which fails to address<br />
most of the questions that needed to be answered in relation to sport.<br />
Kralik distinguishes various perspectives amongst states according<br />
A RT I C L E S<br />
<strong>2009</strong>/3-4 65