04.11.2014 Views

Islj 2009 3-4 - TMC Asser Instituut

Islj 2009 3-4 - TMC Asser Instituut

Islj 2009 3-4 - TMC Asser Instituut

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.1. The relationship between sport club and athlete<br />

Under pressure from the representatives of sport management, who<br />

categorically refused the option of regulating the relationship between<br />

sport clubs and athletes on the basis of employment law (with exceptions<br />

under specific sport law), the legislator simply chose not to regulate<br />

the position of amateur and professional athletes. Therefore, the<br />

new law failed to regulate precisely that which was expected by the<br />

entire legal profession. For this reason, the resulting legislative product<br />

cannot be considered a Sports Act and its authors have qualified<br />

it as merely an Act on the organization and support of sport. The Act<br />

that came into force on 1 September 2008 7 is limited to regulating the<br />

role of public bodies in supporting sport, the organization of sport<br />

events, the fight against doping, dispute resolution in sport, issues of<br />

sports representation and an information system.<br />

The new Act therefore only partially accomplishes the goal which<br />

was set by the government. In comparison to the brief Act no.<br />

288/1997, which was not repealed when the new Act came into force<br />

and is therefore still valid, steps forward were only made in relation to<br />

the fight against doping and the more accurate definition of the competences<br />

of sport associations in resolving conflicts that arise during<br />

the organization or the course of sport competitions.<br />

The new Act fails to define the legal position of athletes as well as<br />

failing to regulate the relationship between athletes and sport clubs.<br />

Sport clubs will continue to conclude various hybrid contracts of<br />

sport activity pretending that athletes are not employed by their clubs,<br />

that athletes have to pay their own taxes and insurance premiums,<br />

that they are not entitled to compensation of travel costs when travelling<br />

to meet their sporting opponents, etc.<br />

4.2. Sport clubs<br />

In accordance with the policy of the present government, the Act on<br />

the organization and support of sport represents a step back with<br />

regard to the position of sport clubs. According to Article 9(2) of the<br />

Act, sport clubs can only be established as private law associations or<br />

as commercial law companies established for a different purpose than<br />

engaging in business. At the same time, the Act determines in the provision<br />

that follows which payments represent the sport club’s own<br />

income. The government’s intention was for the sport clubs to be<br />

involved in sport only and not to engage in any other business activities<br />

or generate a profit, but to invest all their income in further<br />

sporting activity. In my opinion, this restriction may prove counterproductive.<br />

At a time when it is understood in surrounding countries<br />

that sport is an economic activity which can be profitable and that<br />

sport clubs behave as enterprises 8 on the market, Slovakia seems to<br />

have taken the opposite direction and is involved in lengthy discussions<br />

concerning a legal regime that could be applied to so-called nonbusiness<br />

commercial companies<br />

4.3. National sport associations<br />

The new Act has in a way strengthened the position of some sport<br />

associations. These are in particular the associations which according<br />

to the new Act can be considered national sport associations.<br />

The first condition laid down by the Act for national sport associations<br />

to fulfil is that they must be established as private law associations.<br />

This seems a little restrictive and it is unclear why it was necessary<br />

to exclude different types of legal personality, although it is true<br />

that sport associations are in most cases private law associations<br />

already.<br />

Another criterion is the recognition of such a sport association by<br />

the Slovak Olympic Committee, which has to recognize it as the representative<br />

of a sport that is acknowledged by the International<br />

Olympic Committee or by the International Federation of Sports at<br />

Schools or the International Federation of Sports at Universities. If a<br />

7 Act no. 300/2008 on the organization<br />

and support of sport and the amendment<br />

and completion of certain other<br />

provisions.<br />

8 Di Pietro, D.: The Dual Nature of<br />

Football Clubs and the Need for Special<br />

Legislation, The International Sports<br />

Law Journal, 2003, c. 2, s. 24 and following.<br />

9 Article 1.01 UEFA rules for European<br />

Football Championshi 2006/8 available<br />

at www.uefa.com/newsfiles/19079.pdf.<br />

sport association is not recognized by any of these organizations it can<br />

still acquire the status of national sport association if it is a member<br />

of an international sport association which unites at least 10 national<br />

sport associations as members. At the same time, a national sport<br />

association must have at least ten active sport clubs (possibly as their<br />

members - the meaning of the verb ‘to have’ is not specified in this<br />

definition) and at least 200 certified athletes, it has to organize regular<br />

national sport competition for at least three consecutive years, has<br />

to ensure the selection and preparation of athletes for representation,<br />

has to rear new sport talent and has to create conditions for out-ofschool<br />

sport activities for children.<br />

Sport associations which fulfil these criteria become authorized<br />

partners in the dialogue with the public bodies involved in sport,<br />

meaning more specifically that they may represent the interests of a<br />

given sport in relations with ministries and other public bodies and<br />

that they are authorized to ensure the preparation of sport representation<br />

and participation in international sports events, which enhances<br />

the dominant position and status of these associations.<br />

The Act further determines the possible sources of income of<br />

national sport associations, which as becomes clear from the explanatory<br />

memorandum should apparently be limited. What would happen<br />

if a national sport association enjoys other types of income is not<br />

clear. The Act makes it possible for national sport associations to<br />

establish commercial companies. However, if these involve business in<br />

state representation, the national sport association can be the only<br />

partner in such a commercial company and the profits can only be<br />

used to carry out the tasks listed in the Act on the organization and<br />

support of sport or to finance its own operation.<br />

It is possible that the legislator’s intention was to prevent the leaking<br />

of finances which are intended to further develop sport into the<br />

private income of certain individuals. What is the real ratio legis of<br />

such restrictions does not become clear either from the Act itself, or<br />

from the explanatory memorandum. In fact, if it is possible to regard<br />

the rewarding of the association’s top management as part of financing<br />

the association’s operation, this restriction is useless.<br />

In connection with these provisions, the explanatory memorandum<br />

calls for transparency in the financing of national sport associations.<br />

It is however our opinion that there are other legal institutions<br />

which sufficiently ensure the transparency of the financial relationships<br />

with private persons and of the acknowledgment and utilization<br />

of grants from the public budget and that to restrict the activities and<br />

freedom in decision making of national sport associations does not<br />

help reinforce transparency.<br />

4.3.1. National sport associations and national representation<br />

The Act defines the representation of the state in sport by explicitly<br />

stating that an athlete who is a member of the national sport representation<br />

does not represent the corresponding national sport association,<br />

but directly represents the Slovak Republic and that this representation<br />

is delegated to the Slovak Olympic Committee, the Slovak<br />

Paralympic Committee or the national sport association. The Act<br />

considers the Slovak Republic as the participant in international sport<br />

competitions, not the particular sport association which is a member<br />

of the particular international sport association organizing the competition.<br />

However, this perspective does not always correspond with<br />

the rules of international sport associations. For instance, according<br />

to the rules of UEFA concerning the organization of the European<br />

Football Championship, the Championship is intended not for individual<br />

countries, but for the teams of the member associations. 9<br />

It remains unclear also who authorizes representation in sports that<br />

are not Olympic sports and where there is no active association which<br />

has the status of national sport association.<br />

4.3.2. Normative authorization of national sport associations<br />

The national sport association organizes or authorizes the organization<br />

of national sport competitions. According to the Act on the<br />

organization and support of sport the entity which organizes a sport<br />

competition is authorized to determine the conditions for participation,<br />

the rules of competition, supervision of the course of the com-<br />

68 <strong>2009</strong>/3-4<br />

A RT I C L E S

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!