Islj 2009 3-4 - TMC Asser Instituut
Islj 2009 3-4 - TMC Asser Instituut
Islj 2009 3-4 - TMC Asser Instituut
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE<br />
ANSWER RELATED TO A QUESTION POSTED ON<br />
WWW.OLYMPIC.ORG<br />
You asked:<br />
Why was Rule 31.1 of the Olympic charter added to the charter?<br />
Answer:<br />
Dear Roy Bottse,<br />
Today’s Rule 31.1 is a revised version of what used to be Rule 34.1<br />
of the Olympic Charter just prior to the revision.<br />
The previous version (1995 Olympic Charter) was the following:<br />
“In the Olympic Charter, the expression “country” shall mean any<br />
country, state, territory or part of a territory which the IOC in its<br />
absolute discretion considers as the area of a recognized NOC<br />
[National Olympic Committee]”.<br />
The revision to paragraph 1 and the reason for the revision is found<br />
in the minutes of the 105th IOC Session in Atlanta in 1996 (15th to<br />
18th of July).<br />
Note that the modification, which you still see in the current edition<br />
of the Olympic Charter under Rule 31.1, was made “to bring into line<br />
the jurisdiction of the NOCs with that of independent member<br />
states of the international community”.<br />
We hope that this information will be of assistance.<br />
Sincerely,<br />
IOC Research and Reference Service<br />
In any case, the verbally received information reflects the real cause of<br />
the alteration, whilst the formally mentioned reason “to bring into<br />
line the jurisdiction of the NOCs with that of independent member<br />
states of the international community” is but a well selected diplomatic<br />
text. The real purpose of Rule 31.1 is solely to protect the IOC and<br />
the Olympic Games against figurative recognition. It does not need<br />
any further argumentation that Curaçao complies with the terms of a<br />
well respected partner in the international community and certainly<br />
cannot be compared with earlier mentioned rebellious groups or<br />
countries who’s origin for many years already is part of severe political<br />
tension.<br />
5.2 Independent State- is an outmoded status<br />
The Netherlands Antilles is considered a country and listed worldwide<br />
as such 72 . This is not so amazing, since in accordance with the<br />
Kingdom Charter we can decide on entering relations with other<br />
countries 73 . This ability co-decides the value of our statehood, which<br />
will be the same for Curaçao once autonomous.<br />
The statehood measure, based on the ability to enter into relations<br />
with other countries, is referred to as the declarative theory. It judges<br />
four factors: permanent population / defined and controlled territory<br />
/ effective control by a government / capacity to enter into relations<br />
with other States. If these are met, then the country is considered a<br />
State. 74<br />
There is also the constitutive theory. This defines a State as a person<br />
of international law if, and only if, it is recognized as sovereign by<br />
other states 75 . Experts agree that this theory is much too open to political<br />
abuse, reason why the declarative theory became the more accepted<br />
measure 76 . I refer to article 3 of the Montevideo Convention 77 as<br />
well as to the Commission on Former Yugoslavia (the Badminter<br />
Arbitration Committee, 1991). They both explicitly follow the declarative<br />
theory of statehood to decide the status of a country.<br />
The foregoing is important since the qualification -Independent<br />
State- has undergone significant changes regarding its meaning and<br />
spirit. Since the global development of integration of states into<br />
72 www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/<br />
List-of-countries.<br />
73 Charter of the Kingdom of the<br />
Netherlands, article 41.<br />
74 P. Malanczuk. Akehurst’s Modern introduction<br />
to international law (2006), p. 83.<br />
75 P. Malanczuk. Akehurst’s Modern introduction<br />
to international law (2006), p. 83.<br />
76 P. Malanczuk. Akehurst’s Modern introduction<br />
to international law (2006),<br />
p.84.<br />
77 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/<br />
Montevideo_Convention.<br />
78 geography.about.com/cs/politicalgeog/<br />
a/statenation.htm.<br />
Olympic Movement. Also he wished to mention that the Taiwanese post office had<br />
issued philatelic material to mark the Olympic centennial. He would be pleased to<br />
give a copy to anyone interested.<br />
THE PRESIDENT suggested that Mr. Pound send a letter of congratulation to the<br />
authors of the music used in the public service announcement.<br />
DECISIONS<br />
1. Report of the Centennial Working Group approved<br />
2. A letter of congratulations to be sent to the authors of the music used for the<br />
IOC’s public service announcement.<br />
D) Centennial Olympic Congress of Unity Study<br />
Report by the Chairman, H.E. Judge Kéba Mbaye, 18 th July 1996<br />
H.E. JUDGE MBAYE introduced the members of the Centennial; Olympic Congress<br />
of Unity Study Commission and presented its report (Annex 5).<br />
Item 1. The strengthening of relations between the Olympic Movement and governmental<br />
and non-governmental organizations so that the work of the Movement in<br />
favour of peace is more effective. Rapporteur H.E. Judge Kéba Mbaye.<br />
H.E. JUDGE MBAYE read out the introduction. The Commission Secretary, Mr.<br />
Shahbaz Behnam, read out the proposed amendment to the Fundamental Principles,<br />
paragraph 3.<br />
H.E. JUDGE MBAYE asked the Commission Secretary to read out paragraphs 1 and<br />
2 of Rule 34.<br />
H.E. JUDGE MBAYE pointed out that the provision, if adopted, would not have any<br />
retroactive effect. Portions of territory which possessed an NOC would continue to<br />
possess that NOC and the new rule would not, of course, confer the dignity of independent<br />
states on non-independent portions of countries not recognized by the<br />
international community.<br />
There being no comments, both amendments were approved.<br />
***<br />
Item 2. Issues of Sport and the Environment, Rapporteur, Mr. Richard W. Pound, QC.<br />
H.E. JUDGE MBAYE read out the introduction.<br />
At the invitation of H.E. JUDGE MBAYE, the Commission Secretary, Mr. Shahbaz<br />
Behnam, read out the draft resolution.<br />
THE PRESIDENT pointed out that this was a resolution and not an amendment to<br />
the Charter. He put it into the Session for approval.<br />
There being no comments, THE PRESIDENT declared the resolution adopted.<br />
At the invitation of H.E. JUDGE MBAYE the Commission Secretary, Mr. Shahbaz<br />
Behnam, read out the draft amendment to Rule 2, paragraph 10 of the Olympic<br />
Charter.<br />
H.E. MR. SCHMITT proposed that the words “in a general way (“d’une manière<br />
générale”) be deleted as they were superfluous.<br />
On behalf of the Commission H.E. JUDGE MBAYE said that the amendment could<br />
be accepted.<br />
THE PRESIDENT put the draft amendment, as amended by H.E. Mr. Pal Schmitt to<br />
the Session for approval.<br />
There being no comments, THE PRESIDENT declared the draft amendment, as<br />
amended by H.E. Mr. Pal Schmitt, adopted.<br />
supranational unities, a combination of a variety of factors, has been<br />
taken into consideration to valuate a country’s true statehood. In<br />
addition to the four declarative theory constituents, the following<br />
aspects are now taken into account: existence of an own constitution<br />
78 , well formed culture, language, democratically elected parliament,<br />
flag, anthem, currency, social security system, central bank,<br />
import and export laws, taxation system, independent jurisdiction,<br />
law enforcement, educational system, public media, public transportation,<br />
public healthcare infrastructure. It is true and correct that<br />
Curaçao will not comply with all aspects, but most certainly it will<br />
fulfill far over 90 % of the criteria. In other words, if applying Rule<br />
31.1 to deny the CSF its Olympic recognition, it will be important to<br />
have a clear and actual understanding of the - Independent Stateconcept.<br />
Referring to the Principles of International Law, in particular<br />
the General Rules of Interpretation as used to explain Treaties 79 ,<br />
applying mostly the teleological principle of ut res magis valeat quam<br />
pereat that meanings given to words must be justified. The Olympic<br />
Charter may not be a Treaty, but since the IOC is established in accordance<br />
with international law and in fact is functioning as a Treaty, I<br />
am of the opinion that Treaty interpretation principles may be permissible<br />
to explain the meaning of -Independent State- in the most<br />
current context.<br />
54 <strong>2009</strong>/3-4<br />
A RT I C L E S