04.11.2014 Views

Islj 2009 3-4 - TMC Asser Instituut

Islj 2009 3-4 - TMC Asser Instituut

Islj 2009 3-4 - TMC Asser Instituut

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE<br />

ANSWER RELATED TO A QUESTION POSTED ON<br />

WWW.OLYMPIC.ORG<br />

You asked:<br />

Why was Rule 31.1 of the Olympic charter added to the charter?<br />

Answer:<br />

Dear Roy Bottse,<br />

Today’s Rule 31.1 is a revised version of what used to be Rule 34.1<br />

of the Olympic Charter just prior to the revision.<br />

The previous version (1995 Olympic Charter) was the following:<br />

“In the Olympic Charter, the expression “country” shall mean any<br />

country, state, territory or part of a territory which the IOC in its<br />

absolute discretion considers as the area of a recognized NOC<br />

[National Olympic Committee]”.<br />

The revision to paragraph 1 and the reason for the revision is found<br />

in the minutes of the 105th IOC Session in Atlanta in 1996 (15th to<br />

18th of July).<br />

Note that the modification, which you still see in the current edition<br />

of the Olympic Charter under Rule 31.1, was made “to bring into line<br />

the jurisdiction of the NOCs with that of independent member<br />

states of the international community”.<br />

We hope that this information will be of assistance.<br />

Sincerely,<br />

IOC Research and Reference Service<br />

In any case, the verbally received information reflects the real cause of<br />

the alteration, whilst the formally mentioned reason “to bring into<br />

line the jurisdiction of the NOCs with that of independent member<br />

states of the international community” is but a well selected diplomatic<br />

text. The real purpose of Rule 31.1 is solely to protect the IOC and<br />

the Olympic Games against figurative recognition. It does not need<br />

any further argumentation that Curaçao complies with the terms of a<br />

well respected partner in the international community and certainly<br />

cannot be compared with earlier mentioned rebellious groups or<br />

countries who’s origin for many years already is part of severe political<br />

tension.<br />

5.2 Independent State- is an outmoded status<br />

The Netherlands Antilles is considered a country and listed worldwide<br />

as such 72 . This is not so amazing, since in accordance with the<br />

Kingdom Charter we can decide on entering relations with other<br />

countries 73 . This ability co-decides the value of our statehood, which<br />

will be the same for Curaçao once autonomous.<br />

The statehood measure, based on the ability to enter into relations<br />

with other countries, is referred to as the declarative theory. It judges<br />

four factors: permanent population / defined and controlled territory<br />

/ effective control by a government / capacity to enter into relations<br />

with other States. If these are met, then the country is considered a<br />

State. 74<br />

There is also the constitutive theory. This defines a State as a person<br />

of international law if, and only if, it is recognized as sovereign by<br />

other states 75 . Experts agree that this theory is much too open to political<br />

abuse, reason why the declarative theory became the more accepted<br />

measure 76 . I refer to article 3 of the Montevideo Convention 77 as<br />

well as to the Commission on Former Yugoslavia (the Badminter<br />

Arbitration Committee, 1991). They both explicitly follow the declarative<br />

theory of statehood to decide the status of a country.<br />

The foregoing is important since the qualification -Independent<br />

State- has undergone significant changes regarding its meaning and<br />

spirit. Since the global development of integration of states into<br />

72 www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/<br />

List-of-countries.<br />

73 Charter of the Kingdom of the<br />

Netherlands, article 41.<br />

74 P. Malanczuk. Akehurst’s Modern introduction<br />

to international law (2006), p. 83.<br />

75 P. Malanczuk. Akehurst’s Modern introduction<br />

to international law (2006), p. 83.<br />

76 P. Malanczuk. Akehurst’s Modern introduction<br />

to international law (2006),<br />

p.84.<br />

77 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/<br />

Montevideo_Convention.<br />

78 geography.about.com/cs/politicalgeog/<br />

a/statenation.htm.<br />

Olympic Movement. Also he wished to mention that the Taiwanese post office had<br />

issued philatelic material to mark the Olympic centennial. He would be pleased to<br />

give a copy to anyone interested.<br />

THE PRESIDENT suggested that Mr. Pound send a letter of congratulation to the<br />

authors of the music used in the public service announcement.<br />

DECISIONS<br />

1. Report of the Centennial Working Group approved<br />

2. A letter of congratulations to be sent to the authors of the music used for the<br />

IOC’s public service announcement.<br />

D) Centennial Olympic Congress of Unity Study<br />

Report by the Chairman, H.E. Judge Kéba Mbaye, 18 th July 1996<br />

H.E. JUDGE MBAYE introduced the members of the Centennial; Olympic Congress<br />

of Unity Study Commission and presented its report (Annex 5).<br />

Item 1. The strengthening of relations between the Olympic Movement and governmental<br />

and non-governmental organizations so that the work of the Movement in<br />

favour of peace is more effective. Rapporteur H.E. Judge Kéba Mbaye.<br />

H.E. JUDGE MBAYE read out the introduction. The Commission Secretary, Mr.<br />

Shahbaz Behnam, read out the proposed amendment to the Fundamental Principles,<br />

paragraph 3.<br />

H.E. JUDGE MBAYE asked the Commission Secretary to read out paragraphs 1 and<br />

2 of Rule 34.<br />

H.E. JUDGE MBAYE pointed out that the provision, if adopted, would not have any<br />

retroactive effect. Portions of territory which possessed an NOC would continue to<br />

possess that NOC and the new rule would not, of course, confer the dignity of independent<br />

states on non-independent portions of countries not recognized by the<br />

international community.<br />

There being no comments, both amendments were approved.<br />

***<br />

Item 2. Issues of Sport and the Environment, Rapporteur, Mr. Richard W. Pound, QC.<br />

H.E. JUDGE MBAYE read out the introduction.<br />

At the invitation of H.E. JUDGE MBAYE, the Commission Secretary, Mr. Shahbaz<br />

Behnam, read out the draft resolution.<br />

THE PRESIDENT pointed out that this was a resolution and not an amendment to<br />

the Charter. He put it into the Session for approval.<br />

There being no comments, THE PRESIDENT declared the resolution adopted.<br />

At the invitation of H.E. JUDGE MBAYE the Commission Secretary, Mr. Shahbaz<br />

Behnam, read out the draft amendment to Rule 2, paragraph 10 of the Olympic<br />

Charter.<br />

H.E. MR. SCHMITT proposed that the words “in a general way (“d’une manière<br />

générale”) be deleted as they were superfluous.<br />

On behalf of the Commission H.E. JUDGE MBAYE said that the amendment could<br />

be accepted.<br />

THE PRESIDENT put the draft amendment, as amended by H.E. Mr. Pal Schmitt to<br />

the Session for approval.<br />

There being no comments, THE PRESIDENT declared the draft amendment, as<br />

amended by H.E. Mr. Pal Schmitt, adopted.<br />

supranational unities, a combination of a variety of factors, has been<br />

taken into consideration to valuate a country’s true statehood. In<br />

addition to the four declarative theory constituents, the following<br />

aspects are now taken into account: existence of an own constitution<br />

78 , well formed culture, language, democratically elected parliament,<br />

flag, anthem, currency, social security system, central bank,<br />

import and export laws, taxation system, independent jurisdiction,<br />

law enforcement, educational system, public media, public transportation,<br />

public healthcare infrastructure. It is true and correct that<br />

Curaçao will not comply with all aspects, but most certainly it will<br />

fulfill far over 90 % of the criteria. In other words, if applying Rule<br />

31.1 to deny the CSF its Olympic recognition, it will be important to<br />

have a clear and actual understanding of the - Independent Stateconcept.<br />

Referring to the Principles of International Law, in particular<br />

the General Rules of Interpretation as used to explain Treaties 79 ,<br />

applying mostly the teleological principle of ut res magis valeat quam<br />

pereat that meanings given to words must be justified. The Olympic<br />

Charter may not be a Treaty, but since the IOC is established in accordance<br />

with international law and in fact is functioning as a Treaty, I<br />

am of the opinion that Treaty interpretation principles may be permissible<br />

to explain the meaning of -Independent State- in the most<br />

current context.<br />

54 <strong>2009</strong>/3-4<br />

A RT I C L E S

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!