[en]+[zh]Study on Forest Landscape Restoration - ITTO

5 Systematic approach to FLR 191
v<strong>en</strong>tion. M&E is the basis and foundation of adaptive managem<strong>en</strong>t in FLR.
The core of M&E is to establish a set of indictors to evaluate the context and
implem<strong>en</strong>tation of FLR and to find the problems existing in curr<strong>en</strong>t restoration
activities and id<strong>en</strong>tify future options. A set of FLR M&E indictors was established
following three principles: sci<strong>en</strong>tific principles, objective principle and
realistic principle, including process indictors and outcome indicators, totally
77 indicators (see Table 5. 3). It should be noted that the indicator system i~
not fixed and could be id<strong>en</strong>tified based on specific circumstances of FLR Implem<strong>en</strong>tation
sites, and it can be adjusted and supplem<strong>en</strong>ted.
Table 5. 3
Indicator system of Monitoring & Evaluation for FLR
Factors
Indicators
Process
indicators
1 Stakeholder participation
1. 1 id<strong>en</strong>tification of the right stakeholders and target groups
1. 2 compet<strong>en</strong>ce and level of authority of participating stakeholders
1. 3 stakeholders' roles in the FLR process
1. 4 disadvantaged groups. such as the poor. with att<strong>en</strong>tion to g<strong>en</strong>der
equity
1. 5 early stakeholder participation in FLR planning
1. 6 participation in implem<strong>en</strong>tation and monitoring
1. 7 leadership groups/individuals for community developm<strong>en</strong>t
2 Stakeholder consul- 2. 1 quality of information shared and how widely it is shared
tations
2. 2 partnerships among stakeholders
2. 3 coordination of stakeholders
2. 4 institutionalization of consultations to discuss issues and
solve problems
3 Seroice delivery 3. 1 stakeholder satisfaction
3. 2 services obtained by stakeholders
3. 3 level of access of stakeholders to the advisory and support services
3. 4 compliance with the workplans and schedules
3. 5 ext<strong>en</strong>t to which FLR objectives were achieved
4 Community needs' 4.1 information and communication tools produced
assessm<strong>en</strong>t and dis- 4. 2 s<strong>en</strong>sitivity to needs of weak! disadvantaged groups
semination of results 4. 3 community satisfaction
4. 4 level of community participatory of the FLR interv<strong>en</strong>tion
4. 5 spreading path and ext<strong>en</strong>t of assessm<strong>en</strong>t results
5 Stakeholder capaci- 5. 1 demonstration actions undertak<strong>en</strong>
ty-building 5. 2 implem<strong>en</strong>tation of activities associated with project objectives
5. 3 mechanisms for conflict analysis and resolution
5.4 str<strong>en</strong>gth of local self-governing organizations
5. 5 organizational capacity of wom<strong>en</strong>
6 Implem<strong>en</strong>tation
6. 1 coordination of key stakeholders
6. 2 inc<strong>en</strong>tives for restoration actions
6. 3 flexibility to adapt as lessons are learned