History Matters: Path dependence and innovation in British city ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Map 12: Analysis of innovation outcomes of changes to organisation structure in GB cities CIS4, 2002-2004 Figures have been based on indexes Great Britain = 100 Percentage as index number > 125 Top 115 to 124 100 to 114 89 to 99 70 to 88 < 69 Bottom Unsampled data Mean 99.16 Standard Deviation 27.49 Miles Kilometres 0 25 50 0 25 50 75 100 Source: Travel-to-Work Areas 1998. National Statistics. 78
Map 13: Analysis of innovation outcomes of changes to marketing strategy in GB cities CIS4, 2002-2004 Figures have been based on indexes Great Britain = 100 Percentage as index number > 122 Top 111 to 121 100 to 110 90 to 99 78 to 89 < 77 Bottom Unsampled data Mean 99.66 Standard Deviation 24.68 Miles Kilometres 0 25 50 0 25 50 75 100 Source: Travel-to-Work Areas 1998. National Statistics. 79
Page 1:
Research report: July 2008 History
Page 4 and 5:
Executive summary History matters:
Page 6 and 7:
5. Strong local social networks. By
Page 8 and 9:
Acknowledgements This report was wr
Page 10 and 11:
Part 1: Introduction 1.1 History ma
Page 12 and 13:
Figure 2: Three perspectives on eco
Page 14 and 15:
Figure 4: Two alternative path depe
Page 16 and 17:
In the long-run, city-regional econ
Page 18 and 19:
into new practical and commercial f
Page 20 and 21:
Part 2: Path dependence and innovat
Page 22 and 23:
Map 2: Introduction of novel produc
Page 24 and 25:
Figure 8: Selected cities best fit
Page 26 and 27:
Figure 10: Change in knowledge-inte
Page 28 and 29: Figure 12: Knowledge partners locat
Page 30 and 31: Figure 14: Change in proportions of
Page 32 and 33: Figure 15: New firm formation in se
Page 34 and 35: Figure 17: New firm formation by in
Page 36 and 37: Part 3: Cambridge and Swansea: cont
Page 38 and 39: Around the same time, the public se
Page 40 and 41: with around 10-12 firms on each of
Page 42 and 43: Figure 19: The growth of high-tech
Page 44 and 45: Figure 22: Cambridge annual employm
Page 46 and 47: Figure 24: Cambridge and Swansea em
Page 48 and 49: Figure 25: Cambridge and Swansea kn
Page 50 and 51: Figure 27: The explosion of patenti
Page 52 and 53: Figure 29: Cambridge and Swansea na
Page 54 and 55: average in all forms of innovation
Page 56 and 57: Figure 32: Cambridge and Swansea na
Page 58 and 59: new technologies, products or proce
Page 60 and 61: innovation. The Cambridge cluster w
Page 62 and 63: Part 4: Why do cities differ in inn
Page 64 and 65: of the subsequent construction of s
Page 66 and 67: These two studies illustrate how qu
Page 68 and 69: 68 or technology transfer programme
Page 70 and 71: Map 4: Warrington Master Plan 1972
Page 72 and 73: Map 6: Analysis of innovation outco
Page 74 and 75: Map 8: Analysis of innovation outco
Page 76 and 77: Map 10: Analysis of innovation outc
Page 80 and 81: Appendix 2: Secondary data indicato
Page 82 and 83: Indicators of path dependent develo
Page 84 and 85: Table 11: GVA per capita Indicator
Page 86 and 87: Table 17: Patent applications per c
Page 88 and 89: Table 22: Geography of knowledge ne
Page 90 and 91: Table 28: Occupational breakdown of
Page 92 and 93: Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. A. (199
Page 94: Roberts, M. (2004) The Growth Perfo
show all

History Matters: Path dependence and innovation in British city ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?