27.11.2014 Views

Transportation Plan - Town of Garner

Transportation Plan - Town of Garner

Transportation Plan - Town of Garner

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

passes; providing incentives to employees who regularly use<br />

alternative modes <strong>of</strong> transportation; inviting area transit services to<br />

conduct lunchtime information forums; and fund guaranteed ride<br />

home programs. New commercial and <strong>of</strong>fice development may also<br />

be required to designate parking spaces for employees who commute<br />

via a carpool or vanpool. Other facility considerations may also<br />

include shower and locker facilities for bicycle commuters, bicycle<br />

storage areas, and kiosks containing information about area transit<br />

services.<br />

Figure 15 on the following page illustrates many <strong>of</strong> the recommended<br />

public transportation improvements. These recommendations include a<br />

downtown circulator loop with service to central and west <strong>Garner</strong> (green<br />

loop), east side to access the White Oak Shopping Center (yellow), and<br />

the preferred route (orange) that combines the two. Also proposed are<br />

more frequent north‐south bus service to connect <strong>Garner</strong> with<br />

downtown Raleigh, one additional stop, and long‐term rail service<br />

described below.<br />

During the discussions with the <strong>Plan</strong> Steering Committee, the St. Mary’s<br />

Street station, which would be primarily a walk‐access location to serve a<br />

revitalized downtown, was preferred over six other candidate station<br />

locations. Three other candidates that could be options, or chosen in<br />

addition to the St. Mary’s Street station to serve commuter volumes, are<br />

also indicated in this figure. The evaluation <strong>of</strong> these three stations is<br />

shown in Table 12, but are not prioritized in this <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

TABLE 12. EVALUATION OF THREE DRIVE‐ACCESS RAIL STATIONS<br />

2 3 4<br />

Chapter 4: Recommendations Page | 86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!