Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership (KFCP) Design ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TABLE 2. CO-BENEFITS OF KFCP’S INTERVENTIONS Interventions Expected outputs Co-benefits Rewetting Drainage and fire Revival of indigenous fish pond systems (Lutu/Beje) related peatland Biodiversity conservation through reduced access (wetted areas) emissions have been Employment and livelihood opportunities for women in nursery reduced significantly related work Canals blocked Could provide alternative fish pond; and Replanting Increased vegetation cover Improved livelihoods through increased availability of fruits, nonforest timber products and timber Sequestration of Greenhouse Gasses Biodiversity conservation (Planting fruit species attracting orangutan Fire management Livelihood improvement is enhanced Reduced GHG emissions from fire Protection of livelihood assets and peatlands Development of improved value chains Alternative livelihoods developed Improved health due to reduced exposure to haze Possible employment in REDD financed fire management schemes Reduced illegal logging and extraction of forest resources leading to improved conservation Reduced logging and destructive extraction of non-forest timber products like gemor 2.5 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 2.5.1 Site Selection Government representatives from Indonesia and Australia who visited Central Kalimantan undertook a senior-level scoping mission for the KFCP in 2007. The mission held discussions with national and provincial agencies (along with the Central Kalimantan Provincial Governor and Vice-Governor, academic institutions, donors and non-government organisations currently working in the EMRP area and the Sebangau and Tanjung Puting National Parks), and recommended that the proposed KFCP REDD demonstration activity focus on Central Kalimantan as a representative area for the following reasons: Central Kalimantan contains 14% of Indonesia‘s 22 million hectares of peatland. The EMRP area contains the largest area of degraded peatland in Indonesia. INPRES 2/2007 and the EMRP master planning process provide a supportive institutional framework for trialling a REDD demonstration activity. The Governor of Central Kalimantan has expressed support for trialling a REDD demonstration. In undertaking an analysis of suitable sites for the KFCP, the design team considered the need for the site to provide suitable opportunities to undertake the range of activities specified under the KFCP such as REDD and peatland restoration activities. Given the nature of the KFCP as an activity based on avoiding the deforestation and degradation of peat swamp forests, the area in Block E and Block A-NM of the EMRP contains characteristics of the larger EMRP with lowland peat swamp forest, which is seasonally waterlogged or inundated, degraded and drained peat swamp forests and large continuous areas of peat. The site chosen is between the Kapuas and the Mantangai Rivers within a ‗management unit as detailed in the EMRP Master Plan and covers a peat dome as the hydrological unit. Details on the history of the area, causes of deforestation, and the site selection process are provided in the Final Report of the Framework Design Mission of the Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership (15 September 2008). 16 KALIMANTAN FORESTS AND CLIMATE PARTNERSHIP (KFCP) DESIGN DOCUMENT
FIGURE 2. KALIMANTAN FORESTS AND CLIMATE PARTNERSHIP OBJECTIVE TREE Goal/Impact: To inform a post-2012 global climate change agreement and enable Indonesia’s meaningful participation in future international carbon markets. Objective: To demonstrate a credible, equitable, and effective approach to reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, especially from the degradation of peatlands. Component/Intermediate Result 1: Deforestation and degradation of Peat Swamp Forest (PSF) reduced. Component/Intermediate Result 2: KFCP GHG emissions estimation and monitoring program established and linked to INCAS. Component/Intermediate Result 3: Practical and effective REDD GHG payment mechanisms demonstrated. Component/Intermediate Result 4: REDD management/technical capacity and readiness developed at provincial, district, sub-district and village levels Outputs 1. Community land mapped, property rights assessed and socioeconomic baseline created 2. REDD socialised in communities. 3. Alternative livelihoods developed/tested/implemented 4. Fire prevention awareness/ capacity developed and behaviour modification incentives established. 5. Peatland forests restored/protected and degraded areas reforested based on research and restoration strategy. 6. Designated canals blocked 7. Livelihood/poverty/gender impact of REDD assessed. Outputs 1. PSF GHG emissions estimation and monitoring methodologies, based on stateof-knowledge information, designed and tested. 2. Methodologies and criteria for establishing a REL and a monitoring program to measure the impact of interventions against a REL approved by GoI and GoA. 3. PSF GHG emissions monitoring program operating effectively and results validated. 4. Protocols for linking KFCP monitoring program to INCAS established. . Outputs 1. Payment mechanism options developed, tested, and analysed. 2. REDD Trust Fund established. 3. System for linking payment mechanisms to emissions monitoring established. 4. Equitable revenue allocation mechanisms developed based on contributions to emission reductions. 5. Potential additional funding partners identified and engaged. 6. Cost-benefit analysis of KFCP completed and financial viability determined Outputs 1. KFCP Provincial and District Coordination Teams and secretariats operational. 2. Recommendations formulated to strengthen REDD-related legal framework, institutions, stakeholders, and financial mechanisms. 3. Process supported to develop operational/legal framework for KFCP. 4. REDD-related technical skills and knowledge increased among staff of government agencies, legislative bodies, and the provincial university. KALIMANTAN FORESTS AND CLIMATE PARTNERSHIP (KFCP) DESIGN DOCUMENT 17
Page 1 and 2: 2009 KALIMANTAN FORESTS AND CLIMATE
Page 3 and 4: TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents
Page 5 and 6: Establishing a REL ................
Page 7 and 8: GIS GoA GoI GTZ Handil IAFCP ICRAF
Page 9 and 10: LIST OF FIGURES Map 1. Location Map
Page 11 and 12: MAP 1. LOCATION MAP KALIMANTAN FORE
Page 13 and 14: MAP 3. LAND COVER MAP OF KFCP DEMON
Page 15: MAP 5. FIRE FREQUENCY IN KFCP DEMON
Page 18 and 19: which government-to-government acti
Page 20 and 21: 1.3 IMPLEMENTATION APPROACH The KFC
Page 22 and 23: There is currently no international
Page 24 and 25: 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 PURPOSE OF THI
Page 26 and 27: Text Box 2.1. The following GoI Pla
Page 28 and 29: Issues relating to additionality, l
Page 30 and 31: 2.4 OVERVIEW OF THE DEMONSTRATION A
Page 34 and 35: 2.5.2 Location The KFCP field demon
Page 36 and 37: 2.6.1 Preparatory Activities Partne
Page 38 and 39: 3.0 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY AND COM
Page 40 and 41: Incentives to encourage sustainable
Page 42 and 43: The KFCP will identify potential co
Page 44 and 45: FIGURE 3. FLOW CHART OF STEPS TO EN
Page 46 and 47: Peatland Rehabilitation Plan for Bl
Page 48 and 49: GHG Emissions Estimation and Monito
Page 50 and 51: emote sensing products to use will
Page 52 and 53: take the form of a trust fund, whic
Page 54 and 55: Implementation Process Early Implem
Page 56 and 57: Capacity for Effective Governance S
Page 58 and 59: 4.1 MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE AND COORDI
Page 60 and 61: Text Box 4.2. Roles of Groups withi
Page 62 and 63: (ii) develop a strategic plan for R
Page 64 and 65: Information Feedback for Management
Page 66 and 67: Screen KFCP interventions and payme
Page 68 and 69: 6.0 RISK MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABIL
Page 70 and 71: . A review of the program logic and
Page 72 and 73: 8.0 ESTIMATED BUDGET AND STRATEGY F
Page 75: ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1. Livelihoo
Page 78 and 79: cause conflict between forestry, co
Page 80 and 81: Health Key human health issues are
Page 83 and 84:
ATTACHMENT 2. VILLAGE ENGAGEMENT PR
Page 85 and 86:
. Bring land tenure and land use to
Page 87 and 88:
FIGURE 2-2. CONDENSED VILLAGE PROCE
Page 89:
INTERNATIONAL FOREST CARBON INITIAT
Page 92 and 93:
Papua New Guinea-Australia Forest C
Page 94 and 95:
Hydrological Rehabilitation Hydrolo
Page 97 and 98:
ATTACHMENT 5. PAYMENT MECHANISMS DI
Page 99 and 100:
What types of in-kind payments woul
Page 101 and 102:
ATTACHMENT 6. GHG EMISSIONS REL AND
Page 103 and 104:
Present Methodologies for Assessing
Page 105:
ο The efficacy of canal blocking a
Page 108 and 109:
What makes the area so vulnerable t
Page 110 and 111:
The 2006 fire episode underlines th
Page 112 and 113:
— Intensive agriculture on levees
Page 115 and 116:
ATTACHMENT 9. INDICATIVE PERFORMANC
Page 117 and 118:
Objective statements Potential Indi
Page 119 and 120:
ATTACHMENT 10. PRELIMINARY IMPLEMEN
Page 121:
KALIMANTAN FORESTS AND CLIMATE PART
Page 124 and 125:
Potential Risk 1. Land use disputes
Page 126 and 127:
Potential Risk 11. Carbon prices ar
Page 128 and 129:
INDONESIA AND AUSTRALIA Reducing em
Page 130 and 131:
Attachment A The Kalimantan Forests
Page 132 and 133:
Australia is also offering Indonesi
show all

Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership (KFCP) Design ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?