Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership (KFCP) Design ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Implementation Process Early Implementation Phase Develop a Payment Mechanisms and Governance Working Group within the Technical Panel to advise on best practices and evaluate the further design and testing of REDD incentives. The Working Group can include and/or seek advice from AusAID environment advisors and the AusAID Social Protection Expert Panel. Consult with government and non-government stakeholders about how payment mechanisms could work and how they should be governed, and integrate the results into the design of payment mechanisms for the KFCP. Key issues include: — Identifying a KFCP project proponent or proponents, as set out in Permenhut 68/2008 on REDD Demonstration Activities, and determining what their role should be in relation to the payment mechanism; and — Ensuring KFCP‘s payment mechanism is consistent with emerging policy and regulations. Establish an interim trust fund in FY 2009 that could later be formalised as a REDD facility to provide initial capitalisation for KFCP readiness and emissions reductions and could also support other IAFCP demonstration activities. Implementation Phase Finalise the design of a uniform payment mechanism to be tested in consultation with experts, communities, local government, and relevant GoI agencies. Advise and assist local government to develop appropriate institutional and governance arrangements to support REDD payments. Develop and implement program for testing and assessing the payment mechanism, beginning with incentives for achieving milestones and progressing to emissions reductions payments. Continuously document results, communicating what has been learned to the UNFCCC. Modify payment mechanism as necessary based on REDD decision taken at COP 15. Integrate selected mechanism into evolving national systems. EXPECTED OUTPUTS TABLE 5. COMPONENT 3 OUTPUTS Output Early Imp Phase Activities Status June 09 Implementation Guidance 3.1 Payment mechanism options developed, Mechanism options design and consultations Mechanism options selected for Begin testing when experts, local government, and communities concur tested, assessed field testing 3.2 REDD Trust Fund established Trust Fund design and preparations Interim Fund Established Consultation needed to establish final form and governance of fund 3.3 System for linking payment mechanisms to emissions monitoring established 3.4 Equitable revenue allocation mechanisms developed 3.5 Potential additional funding partners identified and engaged 3.6 Cost-benefit analysis of the KFCP completed and financial viability determined Develop methods for linking GHG emissions measurement and monitoring system with payment mechanisms. Community and local government consultations Ongoing effort System development in progress Stakeholder positions understood Shortlist of potential funding partners identified. Link payment mechanisms to KFCP monitoring and to INCAS Refine mechanisms based on socioeconomic survey and consultations in villages. Evaluate governance and corruption issues. Link to emission reductions or milestones. Continue effort to find funding partners or other mechanisms for paying for carbon credits. None Not started Begin late in Year 2. Should enable comparison with costs and benefits of voluntary market REDD activities. 38 KALIMANTAN FORESTS AND CLIMATE PARTNERSHIP (KFCP) DESIGN DOCUMENT
3.2.4 Component 4: REDD Management/Technical Capacity and Readiness Developed at Provincial, District, Sub-district, and Village Levels TECHNICAL APPROACH This component is designed to integrate the KFCP and REDD into planning and governance at the province and district levels by developing management institutions, a legal framework, and technical capacity to support demonstration activities and eventually, local integration into a REDD carbon market. Political support already exists at the provincial level and will be built at the district level during the implementation phase. Given that the forest use classification of the demonstration site is currently in transition, it will be important to establish a firm legal and operational basis for implementation – a Forest Management Unit is a promising option that will be investigated during the Early Implementation Phase with local government and MOF. There is also the issue of licences and approvals from the GoI authorities surrounding the proposed interventions. The KFCP will work closely with the relevant District authorities as well as those of the Province to ensure full compliance and integration of the activities. This process will help to ensure operational links are developed with the District and Province and ensure the KFCP is part of the Kapuas District development plans. Efforts at technical capacity building will have to be closely coordinated with the proposed EMRP Master Plan Implementation Project because they will also be working on capacity development for peat management. The KFCP should focus primarily on REDD-related aspects. Readiness Readiness refers to the preparation required to implement an REDD demonstration activity and, more broadly, for the long-term sustainability of REDD. For the KFCP, this will include the following aspects: Legislative framework. The Minister of Forestry issued a decree in December 2008, enabling REDD demonstration activities to get underway. A more comprehensive ministerial regulation governing various aspects of REDD has been drafted and is under review. Local government decrees from the provincial and district authorities authorising the implementation of the KFCP are expected during the early implementation phase. During the course of the demonstration activity, KFCP partners will review legislation and provide advice to help ensure permanence of emission reductions. Institutional Arrangements. Responsibility for coordinating among government agencies has been assigned to the provincial and district development planning boards (Bappeda). The implementing agency at national level will be in the Ministry of Forestry. Authority for forest management within the area of activity will lie with the district or provincial Forestry Service depending on the forest use classification—most likely Protection Forest (Hutan Lindung) — and its boundaries. In order to closely involve local communities in REDD interventions and benefits, the design team proposes that individual management units be locally constituted and community-based, which could be achieved through the Village Forest (Hutan Desa) designation. Development Planning. To ensure long-term sustainability, the KFCP needs to be integrated into district and provincial annual work plans (RKP and RKK) and the Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJM). The 2010 RKP process is underway. Preparation of the RPJM 2011-2016 will start in June-August 2009. Consultation at provincial and district level will be undertaken to support this outcome. A vital question to be addressed during early implementation of the KFCP concerns the identification of a project proponent or proponents. A range of options is specified in the existing ministerial regulation on REDD demonstration activities, as well as in draft policy currently being developed by the government. For instance, local proponents associated with community forest concessions could be ―bundled‖ under either a Forest Management Unit or another district level institution. KALIMANTAN FORESTS AND CLIMATE PARTNERSHIP (KFCP) DESIGN DOCUMENT 39
Page 1 and 2:
2009 KALIMANTAN FORESTS AND CLIMATE
Page 3 and 4: TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents
Page 5 and 6: Establishing a REL ................
Page 7 and 8: GIS GoA GoI GTZ Handil IAFCP ICRAF
Page 9 and 10: LIST OF FIGURES Map 1. Location Map
Page 11 and 12: MAP 1. LOCATION MAP KALIMANTAN FORE
Page 13 and 14: MAP 3. LAND COVER MAP OF KFCP DEMON
Page 15: MAP 5. FIRE FREQUENCY IN KFCP DEMON
Page 18 and 19: which government-to-government acti
Page 20 and 21: 1.3 IMPLEMENTATION APPROACH The KFC
Page 22 and 23: There is currently no international
Page 24 and 25: 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 PURPOSE OF THI
Page 26 and 27: Text Box 2.1. The following GoI Pla
Page 28 and 29: Issues relating to additionality, l
Page 30 and 31: 2.4 OVERVIEW OF THE DEMONSTRATION A
Page 32 and 33: TABLE 2. CO-BENEFITS OF KFCP’S IN
Page 34 and 35: 2.5.2 Location The KFCP field demon
Page 36 and 37: 2.6.1 Preparatory Activities Partne
Page 38 and 39: 3.0 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY AND COM
Page 40 and 41: Incentives to encourage sustainable
Page 42 and 43: The KFCP will identify potential co
Page 44 and 45: FIGURE 3. FLOW CHART OF STEPS TO EN
Page 46 and 47: Peatland Rehabilitation Plan for Bl
Page 48 and 49: GHG Emissions Estimation and Monito
Page 50 and 51: emote sensing products to use will
Page 52 and 53: take the form of a trust fund, whic
Page 56 and 57: Capacity for Effective Governance S
Page 58 and 59: 4.1 MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE AND COORDI
Page 60 and 61: Text Box 4.2. Roles of Groups withi
Page 62 and 63: (ii) develop a strategic plan for R
Page 64 and 65: Information Feedback for Management
Page 66 and 67: Screen KFCP interventions and payme
Page 68 and 69: 6.0 RISK MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABIL
Page 70 and 71: . A review of the program logic and
Page 72 and 73: 8.0 ESTIMATED BUDGET AND STRATEGY F
Page 75: ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1. Livelihoo
Page 78 and 79: cause conflict between forestry, co
Page 80 and 81: Health Key human health issues are
Page 83 and 84: ATTACHMENT 2. VILLAGE ENGAGEMENT PR
Page 85 and 86: . Bring land tenure and land use to
Page 87 and 88: FIGURE 2-2. CONDENSED VILLAGE PROCE
Page 89: INTERNATIONAL FOREST CARBON INITIAT
Page 92 and 93: Papua New Guinea-Australia Forest C
Page 94 and 95: Hydrological Rehabilitation Hydrolo
Page 97 and 98: ATTACHMENT 5. PAYMENT MECHANISMS DI
Page 99 and 100: What types of in-kind payments woul
Page 101 and 102: ATTACHMENT 6. GHG EMISSIONS REL AND
Page 103 and 104: Present Methodologies for Assessing
Page 105:
ο The efficacy of canal blocking a
Page 108 and 109:
What makes the area so vulnerable t
Page 110 and 111:
The 2006 fire episode underlines th
Page 112 and 113:
— Intensive agriculture on levees
Page 115 and 116:
ATTACHMENT 9. INDICATIVE PERFORMANC
Page 117 and 118:
Objective statements Potential Indi
Page 119 and 120:
ATTACHMENT 10. PRELIMINARY IMPLEMEN
Page 121:
KALIMANTAN FORESTS AND CLIMATE PART
Page 124 and 125:
Potential Risk 1. Land use disputes
Page 126 and 127:
Potential Risk 11. Carbon prices ar
Page 128 and 129:
INDONESIA AND AUSTRALIA Reducing em
Page 130 and 131:
Attachment A The Kalimantan Forests
Page 132 and 133:
Australia is also offering Indonesi
show all

Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership (KFCP) Design ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?