27.11.2014 Views

Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership (KFCP) Design ...

Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership (KFCP) Design ...

Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership (KFCP) Design ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The <strong>KFCP</strong> will identify potential conflict <strong>and</strong> develop means to avoid or mitigate it as part of the<br />

village engagement process. Implementation partners will spend months working with communities to<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> their l<strong>and</strong> use <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong> ownership patterns. This participatory process is expected to bring<br />

latent disputes to light <strong>and</strong> the village workers will seek to defuse the basis of the conflict. The <strong>KFCP</strong><br />

can help communities to avoid conflicts with government agencies <strong>and</strong> outsiders by ensuring<br />

objectivity <strong>and</strong> transparency in negotiations over l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> incentive/carbon payments. The livelihood<br />

option design <strong>and</strong> implementation process will include conflict-related selection criteria.<br />

Village Engagement<br />

Gaining the support of all segments of communities in the demonstration site is a precondition for<br />

emissions reduction. Gaining their trust <strong>and</strong> support will take time, effort, <strong>and</strong> the ability to offer real<br />

incentives. These communities are generally mistrustful of outside interventions after their very<br />

negative MRP experience <strong>and</strong> are somewhat jaded from subsequent experience with programs that<br />

offered assistance in forms that were not profitable or sustainable. Rates of poverty are high in these<br />

communities <strong>and</strong> local economies have suffered from the closure of local sawmills, the fall in the<br />

price of latex, <strong>and</strong> the increase in the price of rice. <strong>Climate</strong> change is a remote threat compared with<br />

livelihood threats that are apparent <strong>and</strong> pressing. Potential financial benefits from carbon credits seem<br />

remote, if the concept is understood at all. An effective <strong>and</strong> consistent REDD communications<br />

message is essential.<br />

A threshold requirement for <strong>KFCP</strong> success with local people is the ability to replace lost income from<br />

limitations on use of forest resources, coupled with some form of tenure over village l<strong>and</strong>s. In<br />

providing incentives, care must be taken not to create an economic pull effect by the appearance of a<br />

windfall—there is evidence of out-migration from the area <strong>and</strong> it would be counterproductive to<br />

reverse that trend. Care will be required to direct benefits to the people who deserve <strong>and</strong> need them<br />

most, while avoiding capture of benefits by village elites, a common problem in rural development.<br />

The village engagement process must observe the following principles:<br />

Be participatory to ensure local ownership;<br />

Be gender biased <strong>and</strong> ensure equal access to processes <strong>and</strong> resources for women <strong>and</strong> men, in<br />

particular those of marginalized groups;<br />

Provide the opportunity for free <strong>and</strong> informed consent;<br />

Be flexible <strong>and</strong> adaptive;<br />

Follow sound development principles, such as ensuring that livelihood alternatives are<br />

financially <strong>and</strong> socially feasible, gender sensitive, <strong>and</strong> sustainable (see livelihood st<strong>and</strong>ards in<br />

Attachment 1);<br />

Ensure that alternative livelihoods are compatible with REDD objectives;<br />

Target groups most responsible for emissions-increasing practices for behaviour change<br />

<strong>and</strong> offer real income alternatives;<br />

Ensure that interventions do not make people worse off if REDD is not accepted<br />

internationally—do no harm!<br />

Do not exacerbate gender <strong>and</strong> socially based disparities (see Section 5.1 for a discussion<br />

of gender <strong>and</strong> social inequality issues in the <strong>KFCP</strong>); <strong>and</strong><br />

Ensure village planning is done within the GoI-m<strong>and</strong>ated village-level planning process<br />

(Musrenbang Desa) but ensure that the process leads to improved access for women to<br />

development outcomes. These plans provide a means to integrate village plans into higher<br />

levels of spatial planning, make l<strong>and</strong> use compatible with REDD, <strong>and</strong> provide a basis for<br />

validating l<strong>and</strong> tenure claims.<br />

Reducing Peat Swamp Forest Deforestation <strong>and</strong> Degradation – Peat Rehabilitation <strong>and</strong> Hydrologic<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

To reduce deforestation <strong>and</strong> further degradation of the peat swamp forests, it is important to adopt the<br />

whole-of-dome approach as the protection strategy because the condition of the forests on the dome<br />

are influenced by what happens downstream of the particular patch of forest. An intact patch of forest<br />

26 KALIMANTAN FORESTS AND CLIMATE PARTNERSHIP (<strong>KFCP</strong>) DESIGN DOCUMENT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!